“The Last Disciple” is the first in a series of three books about the demise of The Temple and the Jewish nation that built The Temple. The point of view is how “Revelation” is interpreted. The interpretation in this series is preterist. Some of the visions in “Revelation” are predictions made to the Jewish people who encountered the Messiah warning them what will happen to them, their nation, and The Temple if they should reject God's appointed Messiah and try to defeat his mission. This makes sense to me because, if the futurist position is correct, than what good does it do warn the Jewish people twenty-six years after what was predicted has already happened. The futurist position holds that the predictions in Revelation are future even to us today. The preterist position holds that the Evangelist and probably the other apostles were aware of all of these visions and included some of them in their preaching.
Hanegraaff and Brouwer, I think, hoped that this series of books might capture the interest of many readers and get them to consider the logic of the preterist position. Unfortunately, even though the series was well-received, it did not surpass the popularity of “The Left Behind” series, a work based upon the futurist position, which popularity catapulted “The Left Behind” series, into a major best seller.
The opening scene in this adventuresome novel has Nero, disguised as Daniel’s fourth beast, led on a leash into a garden hut by his fictional henchman, Helius. Nero is taunting four Christian prisoners with Daniel’s prophecy, presuming the fourth beast refers to the Roman Empire. Three caged wild animals will soon be released to devour the prisoners. One of the prisoners is John the Evangelist, the last disciple, who, like Nero, is a real historical character. Approaching the hut is Gallus Sergius Vitas, Roman military hero recently returned to Rome to serve in Nero’s inner circle. Like Helius, Vitas is a fictional character.
The authors, Hank Hanegraaff and Sigmund Brouwer, have cleverly blended real historical characters and events with fictional characters and events to create a fast-moving, interesting, adventure story contrasting good with evil. Vitas, a good man, has become disgusted with Nero’s cruelty. The authors describe many other adventures, involving both historical and fictional situations. Vitas has a brother, Damian and a friend, Maglorius, both fictional. Damian is a close friend to Titus, a historical person who will later lead the Roman army to destroy Jerusalem and The Temple.
Powerful men in Rome conspire to save Vitas and John so they can escape Nero. They have them secretly placed on a boat headed for Alexandria. They gave Vitas one-third of a coded scroll, written in Latin. They gave one of the crew members a second portion of the scroll written in Hebrew with instructions to give it to John. When the ship reaches Alexandria, there will be a final portion of the scroll. The novel ends with John and Vitas on the ship. This first novel ends in A.D. 65. Nero is still alive, and The Temple is still standing.
I think a flaw in the author's novel is that they seem to think that “Revelation” was being written by John before the historically accepted date of AD 96. That's why they have John writing about things soon to come and someone given the code name of 666. The preterist position that I adhere to agrees with the commonly held position that “Revelation” was indeed written by John but in AD 96 while he was in exile on Patmos. However some of what the evangelist put into writing had already been preached by the Baptist during his ministry before he died.