What did I think of this book? Well, what I learned was that for all that I grew up in a non-Western culture, and still live in a non-Western culture, I'm extremely Western.
Let me explain.
I know that the supernatural is real. I've seen its effects. I've seen lives be shattered by shamans where there is no natural explanation for what happened. I've heard first hand accounts from people I have no reason to doubt of strange things happening in a way that is far too regular, far too prolonged, and occurred far too simultaneously with a triggering event to be merely coincidental. And yet, and yet, I still tend to hem and haw and try to find a logical explanation for it.
It's odd, isn't it? I have no problem with saying that God orchestrates things to happen in a certain way. I can look back on my life and see times that I have been directed to go somewhere to do something in order to bring about some convoluted plan that I never noticed or thought possible beforehand and yet everything fell perfectly into place as soon as I was there. And yet, and yet. I struggled with this book, because it seemed like Bilquis knew when God was directing her steps. It wasn't looking back and seeing an invisible hand moving you about, it was dreaming, looking at the present, and then moving into just the right place for a future event.
My logical soul rebels.
This might surprise you, after all, I believe in an omniscient, omnipresent, all powerful, invisible (unless he wants to be seen), spiritual (unless he wants to be physical) being. How come I have zero trouble believing in that, and such trouble believing that he might choose to use dreams to direct some people? It is indeed a conundrum.
It shouldn't be. The book that I hold to be true, the Bible, delineates times in both the New and Old Testament, where God communicated with people through dreams. It even says that in the future people will dream dreams and have prophecies. No problem with a distant future, but surely not now. Surely God doesn't move in this way now. And so, a conundrum. Why does this idea make me so uneasy? Probably because it can be abused so very easily and has been abused so very many times. I am wary of the idea that I should be guided by dreams, because how do I know if they are from God or from my own subconscious? I know the state of my own inner self, I don't want to follow anything thrown out by it, I would probably end up a blood-soaked tyrant. But, I suppose there is a pattern to follow here in this book, even if the dreams in it make me uncomfortable, because Bilquis didn't just accept the dreams, she questioned them, and she went in search of their meanings and found those meanings in the Bible. She wasn't adding to revelation, or putting her dreams above the word, they were a stepping off point.
And, after all, who am I to tell God how it is that he can reach people? Seems slightly arrogant of me to say 'thus and thus shall you reveal yourself and no other way.' And yet, even that can be taken too far, because neither is it true that all roads lead to God. I guess that's the reason I'm uncomfortable, there's no one size fits all hermeneutic for me to follow and judge if this particular person is right or not, I have to, gasp, evaluate each as an individual case.
I suppose that's the lesson God's trying to teach me through reading and struggling with this book, it's not by how someone comes to know the Lord that I am to judge whether or not they truly know him. It's by how they live their lives, the fruit of their actions. If someone is talking about their dreams leading them to Christ and praising God for those dreams and glorifying their creator about it constantly, probably a better chance that those dreams were real. If someone is constantly talking about their dreams and how awesome they are because they had those dreams, and not drawing the attention back to the giver of the dreams, probably not so much of a chance. At last, a guiding hermeneutic. It probably shouldn't have taken me that long to come up with one.
I also wonder if one of the reasons that Bilquis' walk with God is so different from my own is that we grew up in such a completely different world. I've swum in the waters of Christian thought since I was in the womb, you learn a lot simply by osmosis and hearing others talk about it, let alone the work you actually put into it by reading the Bible and, ha, books like this. But Bilquis didn't have any of that. In fact she had 60 odd years of being taught things directly opposed to the word. My conscience has been trained and molded to fire up with guilt upon mere contemplation of tongue lashing someone, but she grew up in a world where it's expected that you use your tongue to cow those who are of a lower social strata than yourself. Not only that, but she didn't have anyone around her who had walked the walk longer than she had to guide her through it, she had to figure it out on her own. Is it any wonder that God stepped in to give her a little help? Putting myself in her shoes makes me see how very overwhelming and surprising it would be to have to question everything you've ever been taught and thought was right.
I should put myself in her shoes more often. Just because I've been in the Christian milieu for my whole life doesn't mean I'm right about everything. I'm sure God has some pointed messages for me as well.
Actually, one of those pithy messages was contained in this book. I learned something from Bilquis. I learned that I am not responsible for the results of my words. By this I don't mean that the consequences of my words are not mine to bear, what I mean is that I am not the one responsible for bringing about a change in the heart of the person I am talking to. I am a very results driven person. I love data, I love tracking things, I like seeing actions pile up on top of actions to lead to desirable results, and it can be very discouraging for me to spend 8 years talking about God to someone and they aren't convinced. Or to spend 10 years praying for someone and nothing happens. It's enough to make you want to give up, but that's a faulty view, because that's viewing myself as the instrument of change. I'm not the one who changes someone's heart, that's God's job, my job is just to speak truth...even if it's meandering or full of my own struggles.