As an aspiring writer, I don’t like to bash books. I believe in karma and don’t want it to bite me when I release my first book. But I can’t let Josh Bazell’s Wild Thing slip by without adding some comments.
What a train wreck this book is. I'm so mad at Josh Bazell I can barely contain myself. So I won't even try...
Josh Bazell blasted onto the scene with his thrilling, hip, original, and darkly hilarious Beat the Reaper. I couldn't wait for his follow-up, and frankly, every book after that. Bazell was on to something, and his first book had set himself up for a great series.
And then he wrote his second book.
Look, I know there are libraries filled with sophomore efforts that don't meet the (often unrealistic) expectations of the author's first books. That isn't what happened with Wild Thing. I can only come up with three reasons why Bazell decided to write Wild Thing as his second book:
1) While researching a section on meth,* Bazell decided to partake in his research subject and got a little carried away
2) Bazell suffered some kind of head injury, and if that’s the case I apologize for this entire review
3) Bazell has decided that his first book was so good that he could do whatever the hell he wants with his next book and everybody will automatically love it**.
I’m going with option 3, and the rest of my review (rant) will be based on this conclusion.
For some reason, Bazell decides to set Wild Thing a full 11 years after Beat the Reaper ends. His protagonist in the former, Dr. Pietro Brnwa, has changed his name to hide from mobsters who want him dead. Now he is Dr. Lionel Azimuth, and he is sent to Minnesota on a bizarre expedition to find out if there is a Loch Ness-type monster killing teenagers in a lake. To add to the lunacy of the story, Sarah Palin arrives to help in the search for the monster. I couldn’t make this up if I wanted to. The book feels like an unrelated story Bazell may have written ten years ago, and instead of writing a new one, he just plugs new names into the book and calls it a sequel.
The plotting is non-existent, as is the action. In fact, once the action starts to heat up, Bazell ends the damn book. Seriously—the last few pages were actually pretty good and I thought I was about to get rewarded with a fantastic finish. Instead, he ended the book and then served up almost 50 pages of source notes, most of them ridiculous rants about the Republican party that doesn’t have anything to do with the story. It actually feels like Bazell has decided that he is popular enough that he can throw in 50 pages of his political philosophy and people will actually listen. I have plenty of political books on my shelf, Josh. If I want to read about the current state of our government, I’ll read about it from someone who actually knows something about it.
Beat the Reaper was so good that I may give Bazell another chance with his third book. But I am going to spend a little time with it in the bookstore before I buy it. If he goes off on another ridiculous tangent like he did in Wild Thing, I’m going to leave it on the shelf and put Bazell out of my life forever. If he apologizes for it and gets back to Brnwa’s original task (escaping the mob), I’ll be inclined to accept his apology and move on. I mean, everyone makes mistakes. Even Kevin Smith apologized for Mallrats***.
*-Bazell, Josh. “Wild Thing” p. 355, source notes.
**-for more on this phenomenon, see Anthony Napolitano’s excellent book, “A Nation of Sheep.”
***-at the 1996 Independent Spirit Awards and in the credits at the end of Chasing Amy.
Note: This is not the correct way to use footnotes (asterisk, dagger, double-dagger), but I couldn’t figure out how to translate these codes into HTML, and I’ve already spent more than enough time on this book, so I’m leaving it this way.