“What is jazz? If they gotta ask, they ain’t goin to know.”-Louis Armstrong
In the mid 1950’s, the Cold War was heating up and independence movements were springing up all over Asia, Europe, and Africa. In the United States, the State Department worried (rightly so) that its image abroad was one of supporting the colonial order both in spirit and in practice. Newly independent countries were turning to Russia for idealogical and technical support as well as hosting Russian cultural exports such as the Bolshoi ballet. In response, the State Department began a program that would exist for almost 40 years in which it sent the most talented musicians of their eras on tours around the developing world.
How these tours originated, their purpose, and how the participating musicians and audiences interpreted them is the story of “Satchmo Blows the World”. As someone who didn’t even know such a program existed I was, excuse the pun, blown away by the information here. Von Eschen persuasively argues that these tours were primarily to counter negative publicity the US was receiving in strategic areas around the world. It is perhaps no coincidence that the Eastern Bloc, and countries in Africa rich in minerals the US was expropriating, were prime targets for these tours. At times, musicians such as Louis Armstrong during his tour of the Belgian Congo in 1961, were present during a US backed military coup.
What makes this book particularly interesting is not simply that these programs existed, but how the musicians reacted to them. Often asked to play to select audiences made up of diplomats or wealthy government officials, musicians like Armstrong demanded that regular people be admitted to his shows as well. The musicians also were adamant about being able to interact with other musicians in a given country whereas the State Department didn’t see any relevance to allowing for it. This would be one of many issues of contention between government and the musicians on tour who clearly saw the role of this program in very different ways. Even the word “jazz” became a bone of contention, with the State Department advertising “jazz shows” and Armstrong taking the stage and saying jazz can be anything, stop calling it jazz.
Ultimately, the musicians while dependent on the government for the opportunity to travel, were extremely independent once they arrived. They were not shy about voicing their opinions and spending time with the people they chose to. In a sense, both the government and the musicians accomplished their goals in that the US was able to present a positive cultural image when it was badly in need of one. Yet one can’t help but feel that the musicians were the real winners here in that their music, rather than leading people toward American style democracy, reinforced their sense of independence and desire to stay that way.