The NIV Application Commentary helps you communicate and apply biblical text effectively in today's context.
To bring the ancient messages of the Bible into today's world, each passage is treated in three
Original Meaning. Concise exegesis to help readers understand the original meaning of the biblical text in its historical, literary, and cultural context.Bridging Contexts. A bridge between the world of the Bible and the world of today, built by discerning what is timeless in the timely pages of the Bible.Contemporary Significance. This section identifies comparable situations to those faced in the Bible and explores relevant application of the biblical messages. The author alerts the readers of problems they may encounter when seeking to apply the passage and helps them think through the issues involved.This unique, award-winning commentary is the ideal resource for today's preachers, teachers, and serious students of the Bible, giving them the tools, ideas, and insights they need to communicate God's Word with the same powerful impact it had when it was first written.
The book you receive may have a different cover design than shown on the website.
David Ellsworth Garland (PhD, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) is associate dean for academic affairs and William M. Hinson Professor of Christian Scriptures at George W. Truett Theological Seminary, Baylor University. He is the author of numerous books, including award-winning commentaries on 1 Corinthians and Mark.
A really solid commentary on Colossians. This one was a good companion to NT Wrights commentary as was a bit more in-depth and was heavier on application. I’ve appreciated the commentaries that I have read from Garland.
A very helpful commentary for preachers, with a lot of illustrations and application ideas. Used extensively to provide study aides for our weekly Bible study as well.
Honestly, I didn't care for this commentary. Overall, the work was good. He had good exegesis and supported interpretative issues well. I disagreed with several of his conclusions. the most disappointing was some of the application sections as a result of his interpretative decisions, especially 2:16ff. It wasn't a bad commentary, it just wasn't a really good one.
Handy tool to have. The NIV application commentaries provide a nice change of pace and do a good job living up to their name. Definitely a nice series to own in conjunction with some more thorough works.
I was really disappointed--I loved Garland's commentary on Mark, but this one was rather weak. Maybe I was expecting too much since his other one is so so good.