My overwhelming reaction to this book was one of "Eh." It made for good poolside reading, but I kept getting pulled out of the story by a few things:
1. The writing was really not all that good. I often said to myself, Goodness, I could have written this better than she did. Which is not really saying much. I am fairly certain a preschooler with a crayon could have scrawled a story with more feeling.
2. It was beyond unrealistic. Don't get me wrong, I am totally okay with the suspension of disbelief and the embrace of wish-fulfillment that characterizes so much of the "chick-lit genre" (this is a phrase I have serious issues with but I am using it here for the sake of expediency). But this...it was just a bit too far-fetched. For an example of wish-fulfillment done right, I suggest reading "Good in Bed" by Jennifer Weiner.
3. Straight lines have more depth than the characters in this book. Everyone was a collection of cliches. Which reminds me - the author's handling of non-white characters was just depressing. Having your Asian model say "Broomingdale's" just feels insulting, not just to the Asian peeps of the world, but to everyone.
4. The narrator was just so damn unlikeable. I can respect someone who loves leisure and who hates to work, but the woman was so irresponsible and so dippy about it that I actually wanted her to get fired and end up broke, homeless and alone on the street, panhandling for pocket change to buy a bottle of Boones to help her cry herself to sleep at nights over the decent life she once had but so carelessly frittered away. It is never a good sign when your reader finds herself wishing indigent destitution on what is supposed to be the focal point of sympathy for the book.
What I did like about it? Descriptions of clothes, the New York bars, when they'd shout-out to famous chicas like Karen O and Selma Blair, and of course, the fact that she set part of the book in South Beach, which may very well be one of my most favorite places on the planet. In short, I liked it for completely superficial reasons, which is fitting, considering that this book had all the depth of a rain puddle.