Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Last of the Rephaim: Conquest and Cataclysm in the Heroic Ages of Ancient Israel

Rate this book
The figure of the giant has haunted the literatures of the ancient Mediterranean world, from the Greek Gigantomachy and other Aegean epic literatures to the biblical contexts of the ancient Near East. In The Last of the Rephaim, Brian Doak argues that the giants of the Hebrew Bible are a politically, theologically, and historiographically generative group, and through their oversized bodies, readers gain insight into central aspects of Israel’s symbolic universe. All that is overgrown or physically monstrous represents a connection to primeval chaos, and stands as a barrier to creation and right rule. Giants thus represent chaos-fear, and their eradication is a form of chaos maintenance by both human and divine agents. Doak argues that these biblical traditions participate in a broader Mediterranean conversation regarding giants and the end of the heroic age―a conversation that inevitably draws the biblical corpus into a discussion of the function of myth and epic in the ancient world, with profound implications for the politics of monotheism and monarchy in ancient Israel.

312 pages, Paperback

First published September 10, 2012

1 person is currently reading
56 people want to read

About the author

Brian R. Doak

9 books4 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (33%)
4 stars
2 (16%)
3 stars
5 (41%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (8%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for John Roberts.
66 reviews2 followers
January 5, 2025
This book presents some interesting ideas regarding the relationship between the Greek heroic tradition and the giants of the Hebrew Bible. Certainly the cross-cultural angle is worthy of study in that area.

Honestly, the biggest drawback of the book is that the author spends very little time actually discussing biblical giants within the biblical texts, and this is because he doesn’t believe in their historicity (he won’t even say whether David was a real person). As a result, this is an analysis of cultural symbols, rather than an historical investigation and it suffers from being far too heady.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.