Very academic book, serves its purpose to learn about Nepal's history and its current status but fails to convey it in a coherent narrative.
Regarding the origin of Nepali religion:
"Buddhism spread in parallel with Hinduism but was not always supported to the same extent by rulers."
Regarding its isolation nature:
"One reason why they could exist so long was Nepāla’s geographical remoteness, which discouraged distant rulers from conquering the Kathmandu Valley. Mogul rulers appear to have been content to receive elephants annually as tribute from Nepāla."
"The political power structure in Nepal from the eighteenth century on was complicated by the country’s ethnic variety, rugged geography, and political isolation, all of which favored a polycentric division of power featuring more or less strong petty kingdoms, added to which was an overly fearful administration."
Regarding the democratisation of the country:
"Law in Nepal, both prior to and within the Ain, differs from Western or Roman law primarily in the fact that the individual can hardly be separated from his or her social group
"Maoism in Nepal is not only the result of terror or economic oppression by the Śāha and Rāṇā rulers, but also the logical fulfillment of old royal heroic ideals and promises never followed through on."
"Before the middle of the twentieth century. Nepal was by no means prepared to open up to the world, to dare to try new forms of political rule, or to reform itself socially and economically. And yet it slowly succeeded in entering the modern age following the renewed assumption of power by the Śāha and the increasing democratization and reform movements pursued in the footsteps of India."
In summary:
"This shows that Nepal has followed a three- stage model of national unity: It began with the “Empire” model of Pṛthvīnārāyaṇa Śāha, with different social hierarchies and legal systems, without any tendency to a unified culture. Under the leadership of Mahendra (and, to some extent, Bīrendra Śāha), the Panchayat system emerged as a symbol of a culturally unified nation in contemporary times. This system aimed to incorporate modern democratic principles, citizenship, efficient governance, and a commitment to ensuring equal treatment of all citizens under the law, while also safeguarding their well- being within a welfare state, along with a kind of unified national culture, with minority cultures simultaneously being suppressed or neglected. Finally, it moved to the Republic of Nepal’s model of “pluricultural integration” after 1990, as ethnic minorities claim their political rights and see them becoming written into the constitution (having the Maoists integrated in the system)."
"If Nepal succeeds in continuing down this road, preserving its ethnic and cultural diversity, leaving the ethnic populations with a certain degree of autonomy, while at the same time integrating them into political decision- making processes, and if it manages the reforms needed for landownership, labor, education, and infrastructure, then the country can become a model for unity in diversity, even in the age of leveling globalization."