This book is highly acclaimed, but it read quite uneven to me. I’m not sure if that’s because it really wasn’t what I was expecting, or because it was overrated. Or perhaps it was both. Or neither! Either way, I thought going into it. This would be more about the stories of an undertaker in a small town, talking about the death of townspeople and stories behind those deaths and their funerals. And there is some of that, but there are also things that I really wasn’t expecting.
One chapter seemed a bit bizarre to me. Lynch starts talking about suicide and abortion, trying to compare them in certain ways by emphasizing choice. The choice of a woman to abort an unwanted or perhaps a medically dangerous pregnancy. And also the choice of an adult to end his or her life. Sort of an interesting argument, although I’m not sure how relevant it was given the subject matter of this book. To me that sort of like comparing apples and oranges. While there could be medical reasons or economic reasons in relation to an abortion, and there also could be medical reasons or economic reasons in relation to someone deciding to commit suicide, I’m not sure that equating the two with each other is a valid line of argument. Also, well, not explicitly coming out and saying it, it seemed pretty obvious to me that Lynch was anti-abortion. And honestly, that’s not really a big surprise given his Catholic upbringing.
Included in this chapter was a really off tangent topic about Dr. Jack Kevorkian and assisted suicide. It may be difficult to remember all those years ago now, but back when Lynch was writing this, Kevorkian was in the news quite a bit for helping people to voluntarily end their lives. Generally, these were people who were affected with terminal illnesses, and in a lot of pain - beyond the ability of medicine to be able to relieve or even temper their suffering. Again, like with his views on abortion, Lynch is fairly disapproving of Dr. Kevorkian and does not write about him in oositive tones. Which in and if itself is all right. However, it did seem a bit one-sided. I guess that depends on which side of the aisle you come down on as far as whether you approve of what Kevorkian was doing or not.
Another odd chapter was one where he talks about one of his friends in Ireland, who happens to also be a poet. I really was not able to understand what the point of that chapter was other than the fact that his friend was very morbid and was somewhat focused on death, even from when he was a child. This chapter just sort of rambled to me and didn’t really have any cohesion to it. I also really don’t see how it fits into the book as a whole. Who cares what one of his friends thought about death?
A less bizarre chapter involved the author flying across the country to California, and passing over a large section of land that was green, but surrounded by brown desert. He started imagining how you could have a cemetery contained within a golf course, and how that would look. Odd thought I think, but again I’m not really sure what that really had to do with death. Perhaps chalk that up to the category of “What people think about when they stare out the window of an airplane on a long flight“. It seemed like more existential thought than anything that was worthy of committing to print.
There are other chapters that contain very personal matters, such as discussion of his parents and how their deaths occurred. And also of how this is a family business for him. His father was also an undertaker, and one of his brothers is as well. I appreciated Lynch being so open about his parent’s deaths, although I started to get the feeling that writing about, it served dual purposes: as part of the book, and also as part catharsis. I especially like the part where he is talking about his mom‘s death from cancer and he makes the unfortunately all too accurate comment about how the physicians tried to use different words to sugarcoat what was really going on with his mom. She was dying from cancer, yet they tried to use big words and obscure the meaning of what was really happening: that her body was destroying itself.
Some of the writing is really excellent, and I can see why there are people who really enjoyed this book. As an example, I will choose a paragraph from page 51: “When we bury the old, we bury the known past, the past, we imagine sometimes better than it was, but the past all the same, a portion of which we inhabited. Memory is the overwhelming fame, the eventual discomfort.“
And the stories of some of the towns people who talked to him about their funerals before it happened, or some of the suicides that he had to go clean up, are sprinkled in throughout the text, and they are interesting to read. They are grim, of course, but you know that going into a book that is about the subject of death. However, I was hoping that he would go more in depth on those types of stories, instead of going off on existential thoughts. He touched on some of his relationships with others in the town, and how overall the town viewed him, especially when it came to financing a funeral or a cremation. He also talked about some folks trying to replace a bridge that had gone into disrepair near an old cemetery in town. I was hoping for more of this, And less of the author’s digressions about his ancestry in Ireland, and some of his relatives there, and a youthful trip there where he decided to take a poop out in the open in a field.
In the end, while some of the writing is quite eloquent, I do not understand why this book was so highly rated. Death cannot be an easy subject to write about, even for someone whose profession surrounds it, so perhaps the tangents were felt necessary by the author in order to make the book less grim and more acceptable to a wider audience. But I’m burying this one…