I mean, it does provide some good vocabulary for analyzing depth vs breadth in college curricula. As exciting as that clearly is, how highly can one rate it?
I am mostly marking this as a representative of all the reading I'm doing in grad school that I'm tragically unable to log on Goodreads. My stats page is collapsing, but trust me that reading is most certainly occurring. Just not the kind that shows up on GR.
But this 40-page volume that was, for some reason, published as a standalone in 1989, is on here. So this is my chance to say I'm still reading.