The writer is writing under another name: his real name is Winterton.
I was disappointed in this book.
Mostly, the book as written more like a catalogue of actions taken towards a specific denouement. I found myself truly speed-reading through the pages, especially after around 40% of the book. I skimmed the lines at super speed knowing that the author was not really saying anything new; he was merely filling in the details.
So, who thinks that 'earlier authors' are necessarily better than more recent ones? It's not at all necessarily true.
If one is reading Baldacci, for example, one knows that he keeps one really interested almost page by page. His books do not rely on an amazing ending. He keeps one interesting; and therefore reading at a medium pace; throughout the book.
With THIS book, I realised fairly soon that the author's intention was to amaze us with a 'surprise' ending: which was, in fact, no surprise! The book was boring, merely good in detail only.
I have heard of people reading 2-300+ books a year! How boring, why bother? Is reading truly only a matter of quantity?? Personally I treasure a book of 350+ pages, that keeps me truly interested and takes a week to read. (I DO do other things, you know..)
I try new authors, those whose Kindle books cost a dollar or two, in the hope of finding a new good author. Occasionally one finds one. Good luck with your searches.