The rather unusual wealth and diversity of political movements and parties in ex-USSR that are generally regarded as belonging to the far right have recently received sustained academic attention, and even popular, as exemplified by Emmanuel Carrere's Goncourt winning biography of Eduard Limonov. Yet when this book came out following closely the collapse of the union, little if any attention, for understandable reasons, had been given to the subject of the Russian far-right tradition.
The time of the writing of this book allow for a closer look at a variety of movements that are nowadays often eclipsed by more contemporary or at least more relevant elements. Zhironovsky only gets a passing mention, as does Dugin (Eurasianism is dismissed as an intellectual parlour game) and Limonov is nowhere to be seen. Those absences make place for first a good look at pre-revolutionarry nationalism and especially anti-semitism, followed by a number of interesting analyses, later make space for what seems to me, more than the Black Hundred, to be the actual core of the book: an observation (but no analysis, surprisingly) of the rise of nationalism inside and in the periphery of the party itself, and the complex and unique relationship that nationalism entertained for several decades with both the soviet establishment and the dissidence.
Lacqueur's pre-consensus approach circumvent carefully the terminology questions that were being raised elsewhere at the time of his writing and he displays a distance in his judgement of the phenomenon that is all but disagreeable, but one is bound to blame his inefficiently articulated defense of patriotism, and most of the considerations in the conclusion of the book, on his involvement in foreign policy. His generous literary culture, general erudition and a flawless style still fail ushering some generally essentialists judgements, one the "russian people" and "the nationalist mind" that the rabid (post)-modernization of Russia since the publication of his volume has at any rate disproved. Wheras his interpretations of pre-soviet anti-semitism for example, are clearly very perceptive, it seems ultimately that he failed at identifying the authentic leftist drive his homonym Sternhell had already clearly identified.
This by no means makes his book less of a landmark in the field, and a unique work of reference for the post-WWII russian nationalism.