“Beverly Boys’ Summer Vacation”: 5
- Tough, when a story chooses a direction that sacrifices pleasure for a point, and you understand — either intuitively or eventually — precisely that point, and you take it in and mull it over, and maybe even appreciate it, and meanwhile the story just keeps going along, making that point over and over yet making no complementary pleasure along the way (except, perhaps, the hollow vicarious pleasure of observing one see a task through to the end, although that’s hardly compensatory at all, is it? Somewhat like the difference between watching someone complete a marathon and doing the thing yourself). That’s this. He’s amplifying the naive enthusiasm of children’s literature (NOT, note, satirizing or repurposing it; the sincerity of the project is the project itself. Indeed, it likewise doesn’t engage in [much] of that twee prose voice of affected simplicity so favored by certain “literary” authors, as that meta-technique would, again, distract from the point, which is not to employ but to embody the Jack-and-Jill voice) in order to signal the possibility of unvarnished narrative joy. Huzzah. STORY: some boys and their aunt enjoy the woods and a new friend during a lazy hazy summer vacay.