This definitive introduction to the gnostic scriptures provides a crucial look at the theology, religious atmosphere & literary traditions of ancient Christianity & Hellenistic Judaism. Included are maps, tables & index.
Bentley Layton's translation of gnostic scriptures provides a great supplement to Robinson's Nag Hammadi Library. He presents one of the best and most concise general introductions to the extremely complicated gnostic mythology of anything I have yet to read. His collection of scriptures includes tractates that are not in Nag Hammadi such as the Hermetic text "Poimandres." Furthermore, each text is introduced with a summary of it's contents, the literary background, a breakdown of it's mythic characters, and a narrative outline of the myth itself. The actually text includes footnotes that provide helpful elucidation of obscure content and there are marginal references that direct the reader's attention to other passages that can contribute to an understanding of the text. This is definitely an indispensable source for those who wish to understand gnosticism and the development of early Christianity.
The definitive translation/introduction of any anthology of Gnostic Scripture, Bentley Layton has allowed us to hear what Valentinus had heard when questioning the abandoned babe: "I am the word." We are the word, and our word is God. This is the central premise of Gnosticism and the Gnostic religion in general. It is not self-worship, but the discovery of previously unknown regions of the self more vital and more informing than their predecessors; it is what Emerson would later call "the god within," or the "deep force," i.e what is within that is part of the divine. From a more secular perspective, one may also consider it as an extended metaphor that, through its employment extends consciousness, or as Thomas Mann would deem it in the twentieth century, "The romance of the soul." Whatever your ideological-cognitive stance, if Gnosticism is an interest, then this is the book to buy. -J
Fun subway reading. Fun to see where all that mysticism in Aeon Flux came from, and I was also genuinely interested in early Christian schisms and heresies. A definite need-to-read for people interested in Gnosticism and who read English.
I finished the Gospel of Thomas, and I'm generally baffled. Lots of it sounds very familiar, and echoes the canonical gospels. Other sayings are basically nonsense. I'm not a scholar, but I don't think that this adds anything to the canonical gospels.
So I'm putting this back on my to-read list in case I decide to read any of the other non-canonical texts.
If you’re serious about studying Gnosticism you should consider adding this book to your library. Many of the gnostic works included herein are also included in The Nag Hammadi Library edited by James M. Robinson. The Nag Hammadi Library is a must-have for students of Gnosticism but The Gnostic Scriptures has features that make it a welcome companion volume. First and foremost, I think the formatting of The Gnostic Scriptures is superior to The Nag Hammadi Library. Each section is set off by white space and is headed by a section title so you know what you are going to be reading. And of course, there is material in The Gnostic Scriptures that is not included in The Nag Hammadi Library.
Most important among the "extra" material in The Gnostic Scriptures, I think, are extracts from the Church Fathers describing various Gnostic systems. I had already decided I was going to read Irenaeus's Against Heresies because this work is much discussed in Einar Thomassen's magisterial book on Valentinianism The Spiritual Seed: The Church of the 'Valentinians'. I'm saving my pennies to get this rather expensive tome, but I need to do some preparation to tackle it again. I do think that if I had The Gnostic Scriptures handy as I work through Thomassen's book again I would not have to work my way through Irenaeus's complete work.
Even after reading these gnostic works for years I still find them very difficult to understand. They can be contrasted with the biblical material, with which we are likely to be familiar with from years of church going and cultural assimilation. Even excepting that advantage the biblical scriptures have over the gnostic scriptures, the gnostic scriptures are simply more esoteric than the biblical scriptures. I have read the Apocryphon of John perhaps a half dozen times, and Søren Giversen's excellent commentary on that work once, and I am only now getting a handle on its cosmology. I am really struggling with the Tripartite Tractate, even after reading it three or four times and Thomassen's book on Valentinianism.
So I guess one can reasonably ask: why study Gnosticism? I think one of the best answers was given in this volume: early Christianity was largely formed as a reaction against Gnosticism, so if you want to understand the history of early Christianity, it pays to study Gnosticism. Of course, maybe you're not interested in early Christianity in which case you can ignore this book and this review!