A BOOK TO READ ALONG WITH HIS ‘A SEARCH FOR WHAT IS REAL'
Brian McLaren was the founding pastor in 1982 of the nondenominational Cedar Ridge Community Church in Maryland (he left that position in 2006); and he currently serves with the Centre for Action and Contemplation.
He wrote in the Preface to this 1999 book, “Several months ago… A very simple thought dawned on me… I need faith. Here I am, someone who is writing a book on faith, and I am realizing as never before how I need faith not only to live my daily life to the full, but to grow and nurture and sustain my faith itself and also to write the book that you are now holding. I suspect that the very act of reading this book will be an act of faith for you, just as writing it has been for me… This book can become our extended conversation…
“For you, faith is perhaps like death, a subject you know you shouldn’t deny or avoid, but one that is profoundly uncomfortable. You wish, and I wish for you, that faith could be a subject of joy, vitality, hope, and healing. It is for people like you that I have written this book. If it can help you who struggle the most, I know it can help many others too, others whose struggles with faith are perhaps not as radical or extreme, but who struggle nonetheless. (The people for whom faith comes easily and whose faith is never called into question probably would never pick up a book like this anyway…”) (Pg. 9-10)
He adds in the Introduction, “I am a pastor, but before entering ministry, I worked in secular higher education (as an academic counselor and college English instructor). And in each role, I have become more and more sensitive to the predicament of the intelligent adult who begins searching for faith, for spirituality, and for God. I can’t pretend that I’m completely neutral… Here’s my bias: I sincerely hope you find what you’re looking for. Toward that end I am dedicating myself in these pages.” (Pg. 15)
He continues, “Many of us were brought up with some sort of faith as children… One way or another, we outgrew the faith of our childhood. Now we’re seeking for a faith that we can hold with adult integrity, clear intelligence, and honest feeling. So, many of us need… to renew or replace the faith we lost… to let a mature, refreshed faith become the new eyes through which we see life. Others of us have faith, but it is weak or damaged… Still others of us were brought up in a secular context. Faith to us seems strange, an oddity, an embarrassment, superstitious, primitive… Yet we find our secular culture unfulfilling, able to tell us much about the world, but unable to account for much of our own experience… We need to find the faith we never had before. That’s why this book was written: to help you replace the faith you lost, invigorate the faith that you have, and develop the faith you desire but never had before.” (Pg. 17-18)
He offers a definition: "Faith is a state of relative certainty about matters of ultimate concern sufficient to promote action.” (Pg. 31) Later, he adds, “I don’t think the greatest enemy of monotheism is atheism, agnosticism, polytheism, dualism, or pantheism. It is bad monotheism, monotheism carried out in bad faith. Show me a person who has rejected faith, and nine times in ten I’ll show you a person or group nearby who turned them sour with their example of bad faith. The great spiritual need of our world… is good faith.” (Pg. 38)
He clarifies, “I don’t want to give you the impression that I live in this constant bliss of relative certainty about these matters… Much of my spiritual life has been tortured by doubt… those of us who are by nature reflective and who find doubt inescapable gradually must learn to see the curse as a mixed blessing. For example, if I am able to help some readers work through their doubts … it is only because I have been there myself. Being of some help to you is a meaningful consolation for me. But… there isn’t any alternative to learning to deal with doubt… Even the convinced atheist---if he is the slightest bit reflective---has his doubts about atheism---whether they occur in a foxhole, hospice lobby… or wilderness hike. Doubt is part of the human condition.” (Pg. 65)
He says of novelist Walker Percy, “he exemplified in his novels and essays an approach to Christianity that was more stable… full of more intellectual integrity, than anything I had seen in my Protestant evangelical circles… it was a Christianity engaged with modernity (and postmodernity)---grappling with the issues… It was a ‘third-way' course which would avoid defensive retreat and isolation on the one hand and capitulation and sellout on the other.” (Pg. 76)
He observes, “I know that many religious people have set up creation and evolution as enemies, basically forcing you to choose either their antievolutionary version of theism, or evolution-and-atheism as a package deal. I don’t see it that way at all… if by the term ‘evolution’ we mean simply ... adaptive development from simple to complex, a pattern of change suggested by … the fossil record, an elegant process involving adaptation through inherent flexibility and survival of the fittest then we have something potentially very different from an enemy to theism… but rather as a creation of God, and a grand one at that… another great reason to admire and even worship God rather than doubt or disbelieve.” (Pg. 89-90)
He acknowledges, “Ritual has a bad name. Perhaps we’ve forgotten how to enjoy it, how to profit by it… Perhaps we expect too much of it, that it will ‘work’ too quickly, ‘deliver’ too automatically, ‘function’ in a foolproof way … I don’t think we should give up on ritual. I don’t think we should give up on any possible means of experiencing God.” (Pg. 166)
He points out, “A friend of mine has been deeply troubled by history’s atrocities---Hitler, Pol Pot, abortion, the Plague, and so forth. His conclusion: If God exists, God must be … incapable of feeling any compassion, uncaring, apathetic… Might my friend’s own compassion, his outrage, his deep feeling itself be a reflection of the care of God?... if God were dispassionate, how could God create beings with compassion?... Probably there is no answer to make this problem more tolerable; probably our best response is not to try to devise an intellectual system that accounts for suffering, but rather to feel the outrage and compassion and be driven by them to action.” (Pg. 183-184)
He argues, “Nor can [the Bible] be a one-read book, after which we say, ‘The Bible? Oh, yes, I read that years ago,’ implying that we’ll never need to look at it or think about it again. If God wants the book to be an authentic medium of spiritual enlightenment and instruction, then how can it be a book that we feel we can fully grasp… feel competent in regards to?” (Pg. 233)
He suggests, “May we assume that whatever is meant by heaven and hell is meant as an encouragement not to lose interest… to weigh the negative consequences of losing interest as so undesirable and their positive consequences as so wonderful that you will not want to abandon your spiritual quest, no matter the difficulties?.... that the real point of the concept of heaven and hell is to impress upon us how CONSEQUENTIAL our spiritual decisions are?” (Pg. 260)
He admits, “I don’t want to make it sound like I have Jesus all figured out, I don’t… I have read hundreds of books about Jesus and his message and his ongoing mission on earth… But still, I must confess that Jesus in many ways eludes me, even as he attracts me. Behind the pages of the gospels I find someone really there, someone substantial, too real, too vigorous, too alive, too robust to be reduced to a quick formula or set of principles… He won’t be domesticated, mastered, outlined, packaged, shrink-wrapped, or nailed down (at least, not for long). That’s frustrating at times. But it’s also quite wonderful.” (Pg. 287)
This book will be of keen interest to people wanting to explore the phenomenon of faith.