What. A. Book.
This isn’t a captivity narrative, in the typically understood sense. This is a time capsule — an inside look at a society surviving in a specific geographic place and time while undergoing immense change. Through the experiences of John Tanner, we get a glimpse of what the subsistence lifestyle of the Ojibwe people was like in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Tanner was uniquely positioned in that, after two years of being a slave and treated poorly, he was not only essentially adopted (by a woman of some influence named Netnokwa), but he absorbed so much of the culture that he internally identified, at least to a significant extent, as an Ojibwe. However, due to the complex dynamics of how bands and families operated among the tribe, he was not fully accepted, even as an adult with an Ojibwe wife and children. Some families and chiefs accepted him, and some did not (to be fair, as the Ojibwe tribe underwent significant change in the wake of encroaching influence of traders and settlers and the deep, longstanding feud with the increasingly politically powerful Sioux, acceptance was not necessarily a guarantee as an Ojibwe when encountering different bands or families).
What was striking to me at the beginning of the book was how, in a very analytical sense, Tanner was open to adapting to the Indian lifestyle because of his life circumstances prior to his capture. His mother had died when he was 2. The one significant memory he shares of his father is how badly he beat Tanner as a young boy when he didn’t go to school one day, because his older sisters essentially overlooked or forgot a directive from his father that he needed to go to school, and he received a severe beating for it. That injustice stayed with that boy into manhood and beyond, indicating something of an existing mental disconnect from his own family as a child. He was in the care of his stepmother, who was tending a baby and not paying attention to him, when he disobeyed his father and decided to go outside to gather some nuts in the nearby woods, even though he had been warned of the dangers. While many 9 or 10 year olds can be careless in the face of danger, one gets the impression that he didn’t feel he had much to lose. He certainly underwent quite a shocking experience when he was captured and endured quite a bit of hardship as a slave in the first couple of years. However, after his purchase (and essentially, adoption – it was a common practice for many tribes to either kidnap or buy children to replace biological children who had died) by Netnokwa, his life changed for the better. One senses that Netnokwa was the mother he never had, and although their life was filled with difficulties, she encouraged him and supported him as he grew and began hunting and participating in the traditions of Ojibwe life. That clearly had more influence on him than any other factor in his life.
Perhaps the greatest presence in the book is starvation. It looms, an ever-threatening specter, over every aspect of life with the Ojibwes. Over and over again, every winter and sometimes in between, they hover on the edge of death when they run out of food, and finding big game (primarily moose — which is extremely difficult to kill — or bear) is their only hope of survival. That also depends on who among their band are talented and trustworthy hunters, able to track and kill game and return the meat to the lodges. At one point, he describes very succinctly the reality of the threat of death by starvation: “This is but a fair specimen of the life which many of the Ojibbeways of the north lead during the winter. Their barren and inhospitable country affords them so scantily the means of subsistence, that it is only with the utmost exertion and activity that life can be sustained, and it not infrequently happens that the strongest men, and the best hunters, perish of absolute hunger.” He describes people going mad with hunger, and children starving to death. One of his closest and most trusted friends dies from starvation. This isn’t a book to read if you’re looking for idealistic, feel-good platitudes about the Indian way of life. Tanner shares tales of familial violence, revenge, horrific mistakes people made in a state of drunkenness, fatal accidents, disease, suffering, stealing (lots and lots of stealing). However, he also shares moving tales of mercy and kindness. It’s an inside look at Ojibwe society at a certain time, yes, but it’s also a timeless tale of humanity: among their band, there are power-hungry, manipulative persons seeking to influence others for their own interests, and there are patient, wise individuals who stay above the fray and give him counsel. There are ghost stories, spiritual moments, gut-wrenching loss, unexpected humor. One place that made me burst out laughing is one of the times when a relatively new governing official (which had, from Tanner’s perspective, much more to do with trading activities than national interests) thought he was the one officiating peace between the Ojibwe and Sioux (a conflict occurring for generations that was far beyond one white man’s purview). This peace was in the political interests of the trading company as well as the European powers such as England and France, not the Ojibwes. He gave a long speech that Tanner repeats, using the term “red” men (one Tanner never uses to describe his family or band or any other tribe) and invoking the advice of the “great father beyond the waters” and all sorts of terms that indicate the official feels he knows about the tribes but really doesn’t. And, afterward, “the Indians answered with the usual promises and professions, and being about to leave the fort that evening, they stole every horse belonging to Lord Selkirk and his party. In the morning, not a single horse was left, and the Indians who had most of them disappeared also.” And because we’ve read so much from the perspective of the Ojibwes to this point from Tanner, this seems a very practical and predictable response. One almost cheers, after reading that condescending speech. What else did Lord Selkirk think was going to happen?
Tanner himself gains a decent reputation as a hunter and trapper. Interestingly, he refers often to using dogs — this practice seems to have been introduced by Europeans, as was planting corn, something his “family” (that term is used to include biological and non-biological persons in his care) begins to do when he is an adult. In general, they lead highly nomadic lives – crossing truly impressive distances every year. As someone who grew up in the area described, it seemed shocking to me that so much ground was covered every year, as they essentially travelled from the north shore of Lake Superior into Canada, onto or near Lake Winnipeg, and into the eastern region of what is now North Dakota. However, when one realizes they are primarily moving via bodies of water, such as rivers and lakes, it makes a little more sense, but it is still a feat nonetheless. The Ojibwes travel to wintering grounds, to areas the women gather to “make sugar” in the spring (from sap), to lands in which they harvest wild rice, to prairie where they hunt elk and buffalo, and to forests and swamps where they trap for furs to trade (primarily beaver). That doesn’t even include the war parties that ventured further into the lands held by the Sioux (with varying success). One of my favorite parts of reading this book was reading the place names and doing my best to find the locations on current maps (not sure how accurate some of that activity was, but it was enjoyable nonetheless).
The book has too much content and too many incredible moments to describe in one review. Read it. It’s better than any history textbook. It is also important to recognize that Tanner never learned to read or write, so he dictated these stories to someone else who wrote the book. The “narrator” (the person who is actually writing the story) interjects some terms and explanations, and it’s very likely at least some of the content is filtered through the perspective of that narrator as well. As a warning, the word “squaw” does appear a few times, the first time or two in the notes of the narrator only. The ending is also rather sad, as he attempts to return to his biological family later in life, and he struggles significantly to adapt (both in health, as it's clear his immune system struggles for several months, and in others' acceptance of his non-conforming cultural perspective). He was something of a man without a country or true family. It’s still important to read and one of the most valuable texts we have from this part of the Americas from that time.