Binding Spell is a very funny and exceedingly well-crafted comic novel... Elizabeth Arthur asks what life would be like if it were true that our wishing for happiness -- our working for it --negated misery and brought contentment into existence. Life would be, as Arthur demonstrates, wonderful, unpredictable, and above all, funny. But in Binding Spell it is not enough to wish for change. First one must understand the world as it truly is, a living organism, on which everything is linked, so that "everything is all one thing." Susan Fromberg Schaeffer, Chicago Sun-Times, August 28, 1988
Like an offbeat, modern fairy tale..(a) funny and moving story. After a wonderful climax during which a tornado wrecks havoc in Felicity, the characters variously achieve passion, happiness and balance. A tale full of wit and affection, Arthur's latest offering (after Bad Guys and Beyond the Mountain) also boasts the best collection of dogs in recent literature . Publisher's Weekly, July 15, 1988
Elizabeth Arthur was born on November 15, 1953 in New York City. She is the daughter of Robert Arthur, a fantasy, horror and mystery writer and the creator of The Three Investigators mystery book series for young people. She was educated at Concord Academy in Concord, Massachusetts, the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, Notre Dame University of Nelson, British Columbia, and the University of Victoria in Victoria, B.C.
Her first book, Island Sojourn - a memoir about building a house on a wilderness island in northern Canada - was published in 1980 by Harper and Row. A second memoir, Looking For The Klondike Stone, was published by Alfred A. Knopf in 1993. She has also published five novels - Beyond the Mountain (Harper and Row, 1983), Bad Guys (Knopf, 1986), Binding Spell (Doubleday 1989), Antarctic Navigation (Knopf, 1995), and Bring Deeps (Bloomsbury U.K., 2003).
Athur's novel Antarctic Navigation - an 800-page epic narrated by an American woman who sets out to recreate Robert Falcon Scott's British Antarctic Expedition of 1910-1912 - was chosen by the New York Times as a Notable Book, received a Critics' Choice Award from the San Francisco Review of Books, and was chosen as a Best Book of 1995 by A Common Reader. In 1996 the novel received the Ohioana Book Award for Fiction from the Ohioana Library Association.
These awards came on the heels of two NEA Fellowships, as well as an operational support grant from the Division of Polar Programs at the National Science Foundation - the first ever given to a fiction writer.
Arthur has taught creative writing at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, the University of Cincinnati, and Indiana University/Purdue University of Indianapolis - where she directed the creative writing program. She has been married to the writer and editor Steven Bauer since June of 1982, and the two of them have recently completed twenty-six books in a contemporary Three Investigators mystery book series, updated for a new generation of readers.
There was nothing particularly unlikeable about this book, but there was nothing particularly standout either. The events are told through the alternating perspectives of six characters, so it goes in a lot of directions and doesn't seem to have much of a point—except maybe to illustrate the variety of different ways everyday people experience the everyday world. There is a great deal of inner monologue, so you might enjoy it if you like getting a window into other people's (and occasionally dogs') minds. These characters are all quite quirky, sometimes to the point of being entirely unrelatable! While it's always worth exploring other people's motivations, I found it a relief when I had finished the book and could return to the comfort of my own, completely comprehensible, thoughts!
This novel is based in Indiana. Lots of amusing quirky small town characters. A surprising strong thread of atheism and anarchism. But my favorite thing about the story is that the author is clearly a dog lover, and dogs are full characters in the book, a book that is not about dogs. Multiple characters. I can't remember ever reading a novel that did that. The dogs brought this book up to perfection.
I also read it twice (as one of the reviewers before me did) and loved it the first time, somewhat less the second. Still, I think the story is unique and surprising and charming.
This is a book that I read over 10 years ago. For some reason, I thought it was a great book and left it on my shelf to reread at some point. Well, I actually did reread it and I cannot figure out why I thought it was so good. There must have been a reason, but after rereading it, I sure can't think of one. It wasn't great and it wasn't awful... just mediocre. Definitely NOT a great read. I'm passing it on to the library. Perhaps someone else will enjoy it more than I did this time.