"Biophilia" is the term coined by Edward O. Wilson to describe what he believes is humanity's innate affinity for the natural world. In his landmark book Biophilia, he examined how our tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes might be a biologically based need, integral to our development as individuals and as a species. That idea has caught the imagination of diverse thinkers. The Biophilia Hypothesis brings together the views of some of the most creative scientists of our time, each attempting to amplify and refine the concept of biophilia. The variety of perspectives—psychological, biological, cultural, symbolic, and aesthetic—frame the theoretical issues by presenting empirical evidence that supports or refutes the hypothesis. Numerous examples illustrate the idea that biophilia and its converse, biophobia, have a genetic component.
Edward Osborne Wilson, sometimes credited as E.O. Wilson, was an American biologist, researcher, theorist, and author. His biological specialty is myrmecology, a branch of entomology. A two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction, Wilson is known for his career as a scientist, his advocacy for environmentalism, and his secular-humanist ideas pertaining to religious and ethical matters. He was the Pellegrino University Research Professor in Entomology for the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University and a Fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. He is a Humanist Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.
This was very mixed. I found the preface fascinating, and it got me so excited to read the individual essays, and then they were all over the map. Lots of interesting ideas, but often not very readable.
Not many books cause me to rethink everything. This one does. It has caused me to think about the fiction I write as well as the work on biodiversity I'm doing now. What an amazing assemblage of writers/thinkers. The essays progress to build on the central premise of biophila, but simultaniously question and probe the implications of the hypothesis. While it doesn't invite the most likely critics into the room (eco-feminists and neo-marxists), the essays reference their critiques as well. This book is a full course in biophilic theory and practice. Wow! Both Kellert and Wilson are gone now, but what a legacy.
Kellert edited this book with E. O. Wilson, who wrote the original treatise on biophilia. I found this book more accessible, being the presentation of many astute voices on the human/nature connection.
Not a book for the unscientifically minded. I spent a lot of time reading, reviewing, and researching, and I really enjoyed doing so. I realize everyone is not inclined to such heavy subject matter, but for those of us that are -enjoy.
Discussed during "Climate Change As Spiritual Practice: A Deeper Exploration TRANSFORMING ANXIETY INTO EMPOWERMENT" workshop, 6/27/22 with David Schenck, Larry Churchill, Joanna Macy and Jonathan Gustin.
Perfect book for geeks who enjoy learning about connections between humans and nature. Really enjoyed even though it was written in a textbook, professorial style