Group Read: On the Southern Literary Trail
Comments:
'The Clearing' by Louisianan Tim Gautreaux has a lot going for it, but it also contains enough niggling disconnects and imbalances in plotting and character to make me wonder if the story itself was meant for the telling.
Gautreaux excels with his lush detailing of the steamy, southern Louisiana bayou lumber mill and there are many fine passages of descriptive writing -- the author's precise rendering of the workmen bringing down the final cypress in the camp is just one example among many. But, ultimately, the novel collapses under its own weight because the chief protagonists, Byron and Randolph Aldridge, keep dithering and won't or can't come to terms with the core issues in their lives.
It's difficult to say what Gautreaux had in mind for the brothers. Fallible characters in a perpetual holding pattern? A study in passivity? Themes of coping and forbearance factor in the human condition, so they're shouldn't be declared off-limits to the enterprising, psychologically oriented novelist brave enough to tackle them. But what obtains when they're allowed to dominate in a long-form shoot-em-up like 'The Clearing'? My thought: That's a dog that won't hunt.
Impasse #1
We are meant to understand that part of the Randolph's mission in coming to Louisiana is to bring home or otherwise rehabilitate the prodigal brother Byron, the parish sheriff of mill town Nimbus, still struggling psychologically with what he saw and did as the WWI doughboy fighting the Germans on the killing fields of France. Yet, as Randolph reports to his father on his brother's condition, no plan is forthcoming for getting Byron into whatever constitutes therapy in the 1920s or, for that matter, putting him out of harm's way, back in the family home located in Pittsburgh. Following the end of the war, some bad blood has flowed between the father, Noah, and his son Byron, so reaching reconciliation may prove difficult. All of them probably desire it, yet due to the nature of Byron's intractable, disordered outlook on life, they can't quite determine how to achieve it. The author has put this issue front and center as a story element, but then permits the characters to walk away from it for most of the novel. We're adrift here.
Impasse #2
At the outset, Randolph believes his tenure in Louisiana is linked to the time it takes to clear the forest -- three years (it will actually take five years before the last cypress is harvested). But neither he nor constable Byron has a time-line for ending the threat of Sicilian mobster Buzetti and henchman Crouch and for closing down the Nimbus honkeytonk and pimping operation preying upon the workers. It's more a matter of containment than a test of courage: Byron thinks closing the saloon would lead to men quitting the camp for the siren allure -- such as it is -- of nearby Tiger Island. Better to keep the men close, he muses, and let them blow off steam in Nimbus where he can be sure the body count won't get too high. As a result of this thinking, though, we continue to get one violent bar and gambling incident after another, without much material change in the nature of the conflict other than an escalated threat level,temporary at its best, a charade at its worst.
At one point, when Byron drags Buzetti's Tiger Creek Saloon into the swamp as a reprisal for a death at Nimbus, the matter appears to be heading towards a final showdown. Buzetti's gunmen come to the camp, looking for vengeance, but then surprisingly pull back as the parish sheriff and the mill hands put on a show of force. The next thing we know Buzetti is approaching Randolph on another matter -- allowing the Sicilian's cousin Vincente to return to his old job as the house gambling operator at the Nimbus saloon. Gautreaux here has doubled down on non-sequiturs. It's strange Buzetti has implicitly dropped the matter of the Tiger Creek Saloon destruction, stranger yet Randolph acts on Buzetti's recommendation to persuade his brother to agree to Vicente's return (Convenient, though, because this turn of events keeps Vicente at Nimbus where he will be killed later by Randolph in another episode). Once again, the Aldridges demonstrate an inability to address an overriding concern in the novel. We've seen the heavy cloud but can't get the rain.
Impasse #3
When the story begins, Ralph is writing to his father about the suffering mill hands, characterizing them as 'rougher' than those in other camps and infused with a sense of 'deprivation or old wrong being done that has gone into their bones'. Yet Gautreaux offers no fully-developed character that gives us a window into this psychology. We are simply being asked to accept the idea that, intrinsically, men like this, under these conditions, behave on the weekend like deranged sub-human sailors on shore leave. With a more temperate work force, of course, the Buzetti problem -- and much of the story -- goes away, or at least improves. But the mill manager makes no effort to figure out what drives the men to self-destructive behavior and makes no move to change the hell-bent, whiskey bound culture found in the camp. Rando should be smarter than this. Following an idea from the Sicilians, can someone please drop a few dollars on these benighted workers and incentivize them to boycott the bar? We're bogged down here.
A Change in the Weather
So, question is, how does this story move forward? Well, it doesn't because it can't, for some prolonged period of time. Finally the actions of three minor players -- the housekeeper May, Randolph's wife Lillian and the old sheriff Merville Thiboudeaux -- break up the roadblocks and lead to altered circumstances and a final climax. It's no thanks to the Aldridges.
I liked the idea that the old Acadian lawman Merville wants to do one good deed before he dies, then steps up with a plan to interdict an illegal bootleg delivery and arrest Buzetti and his men. Still, this represents an abrupt change in point of view. The book goes to great lengths to depict the havoc the Sicilians have visited upon the lumber mill family and, in terms of story logic, they're the ones that need to instrument the action to take down Buzetti, not Thiboudeaux. Deputizing the Aldridges doesn't quite cut it.
Lillian's arrival surely changes the weather of the story; she's setting up church meetings for the working men and their wives and planning to school the kids, but it's an idea which should have occurred much earlier to her husband. May makes a different contribution -- producing her infant son Walter who finds a path into the heart of his uncle and putative father Byron and starts his emotional healing that's been beyond the reach of the Aldridges since day one. You can credit this development to the grace of God or, more directly, to May's stealthy bone-jumping prowess but either way it's clear little Walter's benign effect on Byron's mental balance does not proceed organically from any Aldridge agency.
Final Thoughts
And then again maybe all this stems from the fact I'm very impatient with deliberating, passive characters who can't take care of business in a timely manner.
I certainly understand 'The Clearing' has its champions and I won't discount the possibility I've 'misread' the novel. I surely know Gautreaux can write. When I picked up this volume at the library, I also grabbed his 'Same Place, 'Same Things', an early story collection that I found technically sure-footed and so inventive and incisive I devoured it almost in a single sitting (from where I sit, it definitely warrants a five-star rating).
Still, one day I'd like to have a little talk with Gautreaux's editor.
Good or Not So Good, ya gotta call 'em like ya see 'em.