I found Bishop Sheen on YouTube this year, suggested to me from watching one of Bishop Baron’s videos. Quite frankly, this book is life changing. I can’t imagine one reads this book without feeling that call to genuine conversion. Well, I shall resist the urge to overly romanticize, and just write my review :).
Before I decided to buy this book there was only one thing I was concerned about: I wouldn’t like a book that is too overwhelmingly scripture-based with regards to its argument and message. Having known Bishop Sheen, I knew this was unlikely, but I still wanted to be sure. Not that I have anything against such books though, but it appeals to me more if a Christian author/preacher is knowledgeable in general philosophy, psychology, and history, and frequently incorporates arguments from them skillfully to buttress his message. Personally I think it is more robust if done this way and is more likely to draw in skeptics. Of course, this is because of my own interest in the afore-mentioned domains, especially philosophy. Well I went through most of the comments here and found one that gave the hint I needed, so I proceeded. The rest, they say, is history.
This book treats exceptionally, the inner conflicts of the modern mind. It masterfully argues that all our inner conflicts, tensions, and restlessness can be resolved by God, and thus attempts so seductively, to persuade us into seeking his redemption.
I briefly summarize some select topics treated in the book.
**Frustration, anxiety, and conflicts (Chapters 1,2 & 3)**
Bishop Sheen begins by outlining the “death of God,” so to say, as the root of the disorder of the modern mind. Man, says Sheen, no longer sees God in nature, - in the vastness of creation, beauty of the skies, etc, as he did in ages past., he is now ‘cut off’ from this approach and preoccupied by his own self. Man, however, has not stopped searching for God; he only now looks in abnormal places, - in the disorder, complexes, and anxieties of his own mind as directed by the psychologists, instead of outwardly (to God).
Three alienations are identified by Bishop Sheen as characterising disordered modern man, - self estrangement, isolation from others, and estrangement from God. Modern man must therefore return to God, he cannot find peace being locked within himself, or in his unconscious mind, man cannot lift himself up by himself. He needs help from God.
Bishop Sheen treats anxiety and conflict by acknowledging their increase in the modern man. This anxiety in modern man however is concerned more with the body (economic security, prestige, sex, etc), instead of the soul. A summary of the philosophy of anxiety is captured so beautifully by this quote:
“The philosophy of anxiety looks to the fact that a human is a fallen being composed of body and soul. Standing midway between the animal and the angel , living in a finite world and aspiring toward the infinite, moving in time and seeking the eternal, he is pulled at one moment toward the pleasures of the body and at another moment to the joys of the spirit. He is in a constant state of suspension between matter and spirit...This state of indeterminacy and tension between what he ought to be and what he actually is.. This wavering between sacrificing lesser values to attain higher ideals or else abdicating the higher ideals entirely, this pull of the old Adam and the beautiful attraction of the new Adam, this necessity of choice which offers him two roads, one leading to God and the other away from God - all this makes a person anxious about his destiny beyond the stars and fearful of his fall to the depths beneath.”
A rebuke of the psychological literature of his time where anxiety complexes are linked to our animal origins (I believe from Freud) follows, with Bishop Sheen affirming instead that only a being with a soul can have an anxiety, and using Kierkegaard’s arguments to suffice, like this one which sums it up:
“Despair, Kierkegaard tells us, is twofold. It is a desperate desire either to be oneself or to be not oneself; a person wants either to make himself into an absolute, unconditioned being, independent, self - subsistent; or else he wants desperately to get rid of his being, with its limitation, its contingency, and its finiteness . Both these attitudes manifest the eternal revolt of the finite against the infinite: Non serviam . By such a revolt, the person exposes himself to the awareness of his nothingness and his solitude. Instead of finding a support in the knowledge that he, though contingent, is held in existence by a loving God, he now seeks reliance within himself and, necessarily failing to find it, becomes the victim of dread.”
What then to do about this existential problem? For starters, indifference is not an option. There is already a tendency pulling us back to the animal, not resisting this tendency simply means we are slipping behind, - to the animal, - to destruction. Secondly, don’t take the route of the atheists, they just substitute the true God for some other earthly one. We should rather do three things: - control our desires, transfer our concern from body to soul, and increase our trust in God. Peace of soul comes to those with the right kind of anxiety about attaining perfect happiness, which is God.
**Finding God, denial of guilt, and the sacrament of reconciliation**
Bishop Sheen outlines fears that keep us from God; we want to be saved, but not from our sins, not at too great a cost, and in our own way. These lead us to seek some kind of comfortable Christianity where our consciences and whims are left intact. One of the manifestations of this is what he terms ‘social Christianity’, where some contend that Christianity should do nothing more than some kind of social justice. People want a religion that remakes society but not themselves, and so they formulate their own ideas of God. The call here is to submit completely to God’s will, remake ourselves first instead of cowardly projecting our inner conflicts to society - pontificating on what they should be doing, where God matters more than politics, where humanity is loved more in God instead outside of God. He calls for a God-centred soul, not governed by its own virtues or habits, but by the spirit of God.
Sheen calls for personal responsibility, and rebukes the denial of personal guilt ramping up in society which (in collaboration with scientists (read psychologists )) seeks to justify human actions by so many theories, almost completely throwing away the fact than man has a will.
In Chapters 6 and 7 are a majestic and convincing call to the church’s sacrament of penance. While Bishop Sheen agrees to, and even recommends psychoanalysis to those genuinely in need of it, it argues against the more radical claims of it (i.e., Freud’s version), for example - its emphasis on instincts - especially sex, and its claims that it rightly leads to a denial of God and an ethical ideal. This section of the book was a debate between psychoanalysis and the church’s sacrament of reconciliation in which the latter convincingly thrashed the former in my opinion. Sheen outlines the philosophy, theology, psychology, and practical utility of confession, in such a beautiful and compelling way. With regards to the psychoanalysis vs confession debate, my thoughts are that they serve different purposes. Bishop Sheen’s chief criticisms and arguments are against the sweeping claims of Freud’s psychoanalysis in his time. No one can deny the efficacy of psychoanalysis (or the now common Jungian analysis, whatever :)).
In the rest of the book, Sheen argues against casual sex, defends the church’s teachings on penance, and invites readers to conversion.
******************************************************************************
Generally, this book was is exceptional and worth the read. Bishop Sheen is so eloquent in speech and penetrating in writing. The book has 14 chapters, and a few in the middle seemed repetitive and not as captivating as the first seven or the last three. This is one of those books you read slowly, soaking up each page as you go. It also highly merits a second and even a third read. I will do so myself.
With regards to philosophy and psychology, Freud is thoroughly criticised throughout this book, which is a little weird because some of Freud’s theories attacked are now dated and no one believes them anymore. Bishop Sheen seems more favourably disposed towards Jung and Kierkegaard’s arguments, of course, alongside the church fathers, doctors, and saints.