Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Thinking About Religion: A Reader

Rate this book
Matching pivotal theorists and theories of religion alongside cutting-edge criticism from a team of leading contemporary scholars, this vibrant collection enables students to gain a balanced understanding of the diverse methods, theories, and theorists involved in the historical and methodological development of the study of religion. It can be used alongside Ivan Strenski’s textbook, Thinking about An Historical Introduction to Theories of Religion , to offer a complete resource for introductory students of religious studies.

272 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2006

1 person is currently reading
20 people want to read

About the author

Ivan Strenski

18 books5 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
5 (20%)
4 stars
9 (36%)
3 stars
10 (40%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (4%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Roger Green.
327 reviews28 followers
September 11, 2017
This is a collection of "biopics" and basic rundowns of European thinkers on "religion" framed chronologically. While sometimes insightful for trivia or a subtle connection or two between thinkers, a student is better off just reading the primary thinkers themselves (in addition to many others). Some of Strenski's critics call him "anti-religious." I see what they're saying but don't fault him for that. It's mainly an exhausting work for an ultimately limited scope of thought on these matters.
Profile Image for Steve Chisnell.
507 reviews9 followers
Want to read
January 23, 2020
Reading this across most of 2020 in anticipation of our Book Oblivion discussions! Quite a range of thinkers here.
Profile Image for Elizabeth.
51 reviews4 followers
October 7, 2009
Great intro book to the key players in the formation of the study of religion--if you want the teachings from biased lineage from a man who doesn't once mention a contribution from a female sociologist or theologian. Could have mentioned more on Muller, although sparked my interest in Durkheim (which should have been a given already, I'm sure). Also! If! You! Like! A! Very! Annoying! Over! Usage! of! Exclamation! Points! Look! No! Further!!!! seriously, where were the editors on that one?
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.