People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era

by barry-buzan

Libro usado en buenas condiciones, por su antiguedad podria contener señales normales de uso

Genres: International Relations, Politics, Nonfiction, Political Science, History

416 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1983

Reviews

[Mayim de Vries]

Seriously. If I could kidnap Barry Buzan's brain and keep it in the form of my familiar, I would. In a heartbeat.

[Ana]

This is a highly complex and complicated work of analysis into what Security is. It is absolutely NOT intended for the skim reader or neophite in the subject. It is difficult, densely written and at times very hard to keep track of. That being said, if you manage to understand the concepts Buzan is outlining, you will be highly rewarded. He explains things with a lot of detail, but somehow most of the times forgets to include a real life example - this is the only drawback to this work. His dialogue remains in the sphere of philosophy most of the time, not because of a lack of connection with the real world, but because of his failure to connect the dots for the inexperienced reader. If you have the patience, and more than anything, the interest, this book is absolutely worth it. I enjoyed it very much and my ability to analyze certain things got better after finishing it.

[Tom]

This is a complex but excellent insight into the problems of security for state and non state actors. Seemingly taking a point between defensive and offensive realism but also acknowledging liberal ideas.

I would recommend this for anyone studying IR, Global politics security studies etc. Do be aware that a background in these issues is needed so a university level textbook would be a good place to start.

[Calvin]

Not for casual reader. This book describe a comprehensive theory of "Security Complex" where states are initially concerned with the dynamics of their closest neighbors. It is a very good theory to explain why some states are concerned other states it geographically close.

[-]

Qq

[Deden Alfathimy]

This is my first book which is read ambitiously to be finished chapter-by-chapter, page-by-page, even word-by-word because of its depth of philosophical thinking in security subject. As International Relations scholar, this is a very comprehensive start to dive more in Security-related studies. The most notable ideas I noticed are the idea of 'national security is not simply a simple accumulation of individual security' and multiple(five)-sector sources of threats (military, political, economic, societal, and environmental). This is a classic and still worth to grasp.

[Miriam Cihodariu]

Mandatory read in college (Sociology with a major in International Relations). It was one of the 'OK' books I read as an intro for the coursework. Very thorough, good for getting you up to speed with major theories.

[mharipin]

A classic and important reference for security analyst

[Anil]

I've read it because of my thesis and it was a good book to have gain perspectives about the national security matter and broader concept of security. My only concern about the book is the timeline that has been written. So some of the hypothesis and assumptions aren't valid anymore. But overall it was a fine study to read.

[Ahmet Kaya]

Barry Buzan İngiliz Okulunun en önemli temsilcilerinden biri. Bu en önemli eserinde güvenlik kavramını çok kapsamlı ve tüm yönleriyle incelemiş. Uluslararası ilişkiler öğrencileri için yüksek lisans ve üzeri düzeyde tavsiye edebileceğim bir kitap. Temel düzeyde bilgisi olana fazla gelebilir. Ama alandaki herkes okumalı.

[SpaceBear]

Buzan assesses the concept of security, seeking to understand exactly what the concept refers to, specifically in terms of whether or not we should see its referent as existing at the level of the individual, the state or international society.

[Mustafa Aqeli]

it is the best for security studies