What do you think?
Rate this book
After Elizabeth: The Rise of James of Scotland and the Struggle for the Throne of England
# Runner Up, Saltire First Book of the Year Award
A brilliant history of the succession of James I of England, and the shifting power and lethal politics that brought him to the throne.
A brilliant history of the succession of James I of England, and the shifting power and lethal politics that brought him to the throne.
In the dawn of the 17th-century when Mary Queen of Scots was dead and Elizabeth I grown old, the eyes of the English turned to Mary’s son, James VI of Scotland. Leanda de Lisle's book focuses on the intense period of raised hopes and dashed expectations between Christmas 1602 and Christmas 1603, during which Elizabeth died, James was crowned and the ancient enemies of England and Scotland were ruled by one monarch for the first time.
With its focus on a narrow space of time, this immensely readable history illuminates a wider period, telling in dramatic detail how the suffocating conservatism of Elizabeth’s rule was replaced with that of the energetic James. It is a story in which fortunes were made and lives lost as courtiers vied for wealth and influence. As well as painting a superb portrait of Court life, de Lisle explores the forces that shaped James’s life, his separation from his mother and the violence of his Scottish kingdom; his marriage to the vivacious Anna of Denmark and the failed rebellions, government corruption and religious persecution which set the stage for James’s accession to the throne of England.
Drawing extensively from original sources and contemporary accounts, this vivid account of the cusp of the Tudor and Stuart centuries brings to life a period of glamour and intrigue that marked the beginning of a new age.
334 pages, Paperback
First published May 3, 2005
66 people are currently reading
3098 people want to read
About the author
Leanda de Lisle
16 books351 followersLeanda de Lisle is the author of bestselling Tudor and Stuart history praised for meticulous research as well as strong narratives. She has a Masters degree in history from Oxford University. TUDOR, her biography of the Tudor family 1437-1603, was a top ten Sunday Times best seller, BBC History book of the year, Daily Telegraph book of the year, and History Today book of the year. THE SISTERS WHO WOULD BE QUEEN; THE TRAGEDY OF MARY, KATHERINE AND LADY JANE GREY, was a New York Times best seller and is the inspiration for Phillippa Gregory's 2017 novel THE LAST TUDOR. Her latest book WHITE KING,, a biography of the doomed Charles I, is her most dramatic yet and is the winner of the 2018 Historical Writers Association non-fiction crown.
Leanda does a monthly podcast on itunes Ten Minute Tudors, it uncovers the true Tudors and Stuarts behind the myths.
Leanda does a monthly podcast on itunes Ten Minute Tudors, it uncovers the true Tudors and Stuarts behind the myths.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 95 reviews
October 19, 2019
Answering the question of how James won the race to succeed Elizabeth. And how he got unpopular very quickly thereafter.
He promised all things to all comers: toleration to Catholics and reform to Puritans, for example. He couldn't possibly deliver on all of his promises. There was reason for his being known as "the wisest fool in Christendom." And additionally, he loathed the common people, whereas Elizabeth Tudor had never met a crowd she didn't like (and couldn't win over).
Elizabeth's regime had been unpopular at the end of her rule, but within a few years of James' accession, many would have given a great deal to have the Old Queen back. People began celebrating her accession day again, and not James'. (Or, later, Charles'.)
Probably about 3.5 stars.
He promised all things to all comers: toleration to Catholics and reform to Puritans, for example. He couldn't possibly deliver on all of his promises. There was reason for his being known as "the wisest fool in Christendom." And additionally, he loathed the common people, whereas Elizabeth Tudor had never met a crowd she didn't like (and couldn't win over).
Elizabeth's regime had been unpopular at the end of her rule, but within a few years of James' accession, many would have given a great deal to have the Old Queen back. People began celebrating her accession day again, and not James'. (Or, later, Charles'.)
Probably about 3.5 stars.
January 26, 2014
De Lisle's research debunks a common notion that a hapless yet expectant James entered London to claim what was his. It was not so simple. The author gives us the reasons why and describes the plots to derail the enthronement of the only descendant of Mary Queen of Scots. Interestingly, Elizabeth's trusted adviser Cecil had been staging this prior to Elizabeth's death in a time when it was illegal to even mention the succession. With a cooperative and more cunning than given credit for James, Cecil prevails and profits.
The Elizabethan court gawks at James' entourage, appalled by their clothing and uncouth speech... almost like Jed Clampett moving to Beverly Hills. The descriptions of this, and the reaction to James' selling knight-ships and appointing Scots to high places are priceless.
De Lisle has piqued my interest in James, he's obviously more complex than I had thought and his marriage even more interesting. His wife becomes a Catholic, not in her native Denmark, but in Scotland where as James warns, it could be hazardous to their rule. Was her separation from young Henry as simple as stated? How about her friendships with those who plot against James? With James' well documented interest in young men, Anna's cutting of Elizabeth's gown to show her leg and foot in a play is even more provocative than it is as merely an act of a fun loving queen. James writes to her lovingly and seems to speak to her with respect, but the other facts don't square with a happy marriage.
As curious as I am about this, I like that the author sticks to her thesis. With the exception of text devoted to the Raleigh trial, she doesn't give in to the many tempting side stories. I hope to find something equally well done on James & Anna and their rule. Maybe De Lisle will write it. This is apparently her first book, and it is so well done, I await the next.
The Elizabethan court gawks at James' entourage, appalled by their clothing and uncouth speech... almost like Jed Clampett moving to Beverly Hills. The descriptions of this, and the reaction to James' selling knight-ships and appointing Scots to high places are priceless.
De Lisle has piqued my interest in James, he's obviously more complex than I had thought and his marriage even more interesting. His wife becomes a Catholic, not in her native Denmark, but in Scotland where as James warns, it could be hazardous to their rule. Was her separation from young Henry as simple as stated? How about her friendships with those who plot against James? With James' well documented interest in young men, Anna's cutting of Elizabeth's gown to show her leg and foot in a play is even more provocative than it is as merely an act of a fun loving queen. James writes to her lovingly and seems to speak to her with respect, but the other facts don't square with a happy marriage.
As curious as I am about this, I like that the author sticks to her thesis. With the exception of text devoted to the Raleigh trial, she doesn't give in to the many tempting side stories. I hope to find something equally well done on James & Anna and their rule. Maybe De Lisle will write it. This is apparently her first book, and it is so well done, I await the next.
October 16, 2014
With the constant spotlight on Elizabeth’s I’s dominance over the Spanish Armada, her virginity, and her ‘glorious’ reign; the tension during her dying days at the absence of an heir is much forgotten. The ascent to the throne of James I was met with some skepticism and created some controversy. Leanda de Lisle opens the door on this period of English history in, “After Elizabeth: The Rise of James of Scotland and the Struggle for the Throne of England”.
The thesis of “After Elizabeth” is quite unique as it forgoes the focus of reign politics and instead highlights a specific time period on a psychological level. Those readers who prefer history to delve into the psyche of key figures and unravel the courtly tensions; will find delight in Lisle’s “After Elizabeth”.
The first section of “After Elizabeth” reveals the key figures in line for the throne and the drama surrounding each. In this manner, Lisle truly offers a glimpse into the courtly environment and the effects on Elizabeth portraying her as a ‘real’ person versus a goddess. Not to mention, some figures such as Arbella Stuart and Anne (wife of James) are brought into the foreground whereas they otherwise don’t always receive ample attention.
The mighty issue is that Lisle is very choppy with her narrative and is unable to find a cohesive strand making the reading a bit tedious and confusing. On the other hand, the level of meticulous research is impressive and quite satisfying for the reader as Lisle presents a wealth of information without an abundance of speculation or bias. This, mixed with the Lisle panache for detective work in order to debunk myths; keeps the pages turning even through slower passages.
In typical Lisle fashion (as in her other books), Shakespeare is often quoted (he was NOT a historian!); and also poems and lyrics from unverified sources. This weakens the text and makes Lisle seem like she was either desperate for sources or tried too hard to thicken up “After Elizabeth”.
The second part of “After Elizabeth” is much better with a tighter prose and smoother content. The transition of England’s throne to a king from Scotland is portrayed in an illustrative and easy-to-understand manner. Again, the emphasis is more on a psychological and sociological level making “After Elizabeth” perfect for readers less familiar with James and Stuart England.
One of the striking features of Lisle’s writing is her blend of scholarly text with an almost literary feel but not in an over-the-top way. This moistens up information which otherwise would be dry and makes “After Elizabeth” more readable. There are times, however, when Lisle strays a bit on tangents and ventures too far from her discussions.
The concluding chapters of “After Elizabeth” focus on the Main and Bye plots and also the downfall of Sir Walter Raleigh. The text is infused with much excitement as the conspiracies are discussed and quotes from Raleigh’s trial are included (plus letters to his wife). The final pages excellently wrap up the thesis with a look at the effects of James’s gaining of the throne and his legacy (or lack thereof in comparison to Elizabeth). The text is poignant and deep both emotionally and intellectually.
“After Elizabeth” contains two sections of color plates, genealogical charts, maps, notes, and a bibliography of both primary and secondary sources for the staunch fact-checkers.
Lisle’s “After Elizabeth” is unique and scholarly but with a narrative flow which will appeal to those new to the topic. Although there are some issues with choppiness and tangents; “After Elizabeth” is a rather strong look at the transition of James from Elizabeth and is recommended for history lovers interested in the time period.
Note: My rating for "After Elizabeth" is more of a 3.5. I rounded down to a 3 because I gave 4 stars to Lisle's "Tudor: A Family Story" and feel that it was better than this so that deserved a 4 while "After Elizabeth" went down to a 3.
The thesis of “After Elizabeth” is quite unique as it forgoes the focus of reign politics and instead highlights a specific time period on a psychological level. Those readers who prefer history to delve into the psyche of key figures and unravel the courtly tensions; will find delight in Lisle’s “After Elizabeth”.
The first section of “After Elizabeth” reveals the key figures in line for the throne and the drama surrounding each. In this manner, Lisle truly offers a glimpse into the courtly environment and the effects on Elizabeth portraying her as a ‘real’ person versus a goddess. Not to mention, some figures such as Arbella Stuart and Anne (wife of James) are brought into the foreground whereas they otherwise don’t always receive ample attention.
The mighty issue is that Lisle is very choppy with her narrative and is unable to find a cohesive strand making the reading a bit tedious and confusing. On the other hand, the level of meticulous research is impressive and quite satisfying for the reader as Lisle presents a wealth of information without an abundance of speculation or bias. This, mixed with the Lisle panache for detective work in order to debunk myths; keeps the pages turning even through slower passages.
In typical Lisle fashion (as in her other books), Shakespeare is often quoted (he was NOT a historian!); and also poems and lyrics from unverified sources. This weakens the text and makes Lisle seem like she was either desperate for sources or tried too hard to thicken up “After Elizabeth”.
The second part of “After Elizabeth” is much better with a tighter prose and smoother content. The transition of England’s throne to a king from Scotland is portrayed in an illustrative and easy-to-understand manner. Again, the emphasis is more on a psychological and sociological level making “After Elizabeth” perfect for readers less familiar with James and Stuart England.
One of the striking features of Lisle’s writing is her blend of scholarly text with an almost literary feel but not in an over-the-top way. This moistens up information which otherwise would be dry and makes “After Elizabeth” more readable. There are times, however, when Lisle strays a bit on tangents and ventures too far from her discussions.
The concluding chapters of “After Elizabeth” focus on the Main and Bye plots and also the downfall of Sir Walter Raleigh. The text is infused with much excitement as the conspiracies are discussed and quotes from Raleigh’s trial are included (plus letters to his wife). The final pages excellently wrap up the thesis with a look at the effects of James’s gaining of the throne and his legacy (or lack thereof in comparison to Elizabeth). The text is poignant and deep both emotionally and intellectually.
“After Elizabeth” contains two sections of color plates, genealogical charts, maps, notes, and a bibliography of both primary and secondary sources for the staunch fact-checkers.
Lisle’s “After Elizabeth” is unique and scholarly but with a narrative flow which will appeal to those new to the topic. Although there are some issues with choppiness and tangents; “After Elizabeth” is a rather strong look at the transition of James from Elizabeth and is recommended for history lovers interested in the time period.
Note: My rating for "After Elizabeth" is more of a 3.5. I rounded down to a 3 because I gave 4 stars to Lisle's "Tudor: A Family Story" and feel that it was better than this so that deserved a 4 while "After Elizabeth" went down to a 3.
December 24, 2020
There is an unreasonable 400 year gap of ignorance in my knowledge of English history which falls between the death of Queen Elizabeth the first and World War I, So when I saw this book I was keenly interested to start filling in the missing centuries. This book is interesting and quite easy to read; you don't need to be an academic expert, simply an enquiring reader. The important people and their relationships are well explained, and their personalities made evident. I look forward to exploring more of the author's work.
Read
October 31, 2022James Stuart might have been first in line to inherit the English crown from the childless queen Elizabeth, but his path to power still wasn't an easy one. By various interpretations of English law, as a foreigner (a Scot) he was ineligible to occupy the throne. Then there was his Catholic wife, a matter of concern for Anglican authorities still inclined to define Englishness in opposition to the Church of Rome. It's far from inconceivable that a nativist rebellion, such as the Essex revolt, could have prevented James from ever ruling England. He had to play a skillful diplomatic hand to ensure it. He also needed a bit of luck.
After Elizabeth explains how it happened. Along the way, it illuminates the political, religious and economic conditions that prevailed in England towards the close of the sixteenth century. Dense in detail, it's not quite the book I'd recommend to the casual reader. There are many popular biographies of the Tudors and Stuarts which would serve as better introductions to the subject broadly covered by this book. But if you're ready to look at the Elizabethan age with a microscope, this is a good place to start.
I especially recommend After Elizabeth to anyone deep into the Gunpowder Plot. It describes its social context.
After Elizabeth explains how it happened. Along the way, it illuminates the political, religious and economic conditions that prevailed in England towards the close of the sixteenth century. Dense in detail, it's not quite the book I'd recommend to the casual reader. There are many popular biographies of the Tudors and Stuarts which would serve as better introductions to the subject broadly covered by this book. But if you're ready to look at the Elizabethan age with a microscope, this is a good place to start.
I especially recommend After Elizabeth to anyone deep into the Gunpowder Plot. It describes its social context.
March 27, 2023
3.75 rounded up
This is a very detailed look at the close of the Elizabethen Era and the rise of the Stuarts.
This is primarily about the players of note in the court of England and Scotland.
It covers how James is chosen to replace Elizabeth and how this is influenced to happen.
I'm only passingly familiar with this period but the sources seem solid.
This is a very detailed look at the close of the Elizabethen Era and the rise of the Stuarts.
This is primarily about the players of note in the court of England and Scotland.
It covers how James is chosen to replace Elizabeth and how this is influenced to happen.
I'm only passingly familiar with this period but the sources seem solid.
Read
September 2, 2014When I was growing up, school and local library shelves in the history section pretty much went Henry VIII--Elizabeth--Shakespeare--Charles I and Commonwealth--Charles II--Glorious Revolution to Hanover. It was like James I and VI didn't exist, which is pretty astonishing when you take into consideration the centuries of war between Scotland and England, and here, for the first time, was a king of both countries, and without firing a shot.
This book's focus is on how very close James came to not being crowned at all.
The good? Lisle knows her stuff. The book is packed with references to journals, letters, archives, records. She even describes the ancient coronation regalia, some of it dating back centuries, before it all was broken up by Cromwell's men.
The bad? She knows her stuff so well that the book is all over the place time-and-place wise. There is a great deal of back and forth between England and Scotland, and in time; close to halfway through the book we've been going back to the 1500s so many times that Elizabeth still hasn't died yet, though the title is "After Elizabeth." But once the old queen breathes her last, most of the major players are in place, and we swiftly progress through the various plots by secular Catholics, Jesuits, the Spanish, the French, and clusters of nobles to get rid of James in favor of their own candidates, the most popular choice being Arbella Stuart, whose birth the brilliant and indefatigable Bess of Hardwick knew was going to be a problem from the gitgo. As indeed it was.
I think this book will appeal most to readers who are already familiar with the many, many remarkable figures of this particular time, and the succession of events. And who are already familiar with the details of the Gunpowder Plot and its aftermath, as the end is oddly truncated, pretty much meandering to a close after the trial of the Mains and Byes, with some hasty summations of various players' ends.
This book's focus is on how very close James came to not being crowned at all.
The good? Lisle knows her stuff. The book is packed with references to journals, letters, archives, records. She even describes the ancient coronation regalia, some of it dating back centuries, before it all was broken up by Cromwell's men.
The bad? She knows her stuff so well that the book is all over the place time-and-place wise. There is a great deal of back and forth between England and Scotland, and in time; close to halfway through the book we've been going back to the 1500s so many times that Elizabeth still hasn't died yet, though the title is "After Elizabeth." But once the old queen breathes her last, most of the major players are in place, and we swiftly progress through the various plots by secular Catholics, Jesuits, the Spanish, the French, and clusters of nobles to get rid of James in favor of their own candidates, the most popular choice being Arbella Stuart, whose birth the brilliant and indefatigable Bess of Hardwick knew was going to be a problem from the gitgo. As indeed it was.
I think this book will appeal most to readers who are already familiar with the many, many remarkable figures of this particular time, and the succession of events. And who are already familiar with the details of the Gunpowder Plot and its aftermath, as the end is oddly truncated, pretty much meandering to a close after the trial of the Mains and Byes, with some hasty summations of various players' ends.
December 19, 2012
This book barely eked out the second star - I can't believe how disappointed I was! I read this same authors "Sisters Who Would Be Queen," which was a riveting take on the entire Tudor succession crisis, rife with plots and romance and tragedy.
This book, on the other hand, has none of that. It is a look at how James succeeded Elizabeth, focusing on the pivotal year or two surrounding the event. There is nowhere near the level of intrigue - there's just a lot of plotting and many accusations of treason, but nothing much actually happens. For all that the author tries to convince us otherwise, James is clearly seen as the viable alternative.
The first part, which deals with the uncertainty surrounding the end of Elizabeth's reign, is at least somewhat interesting. But once she dies, so does the momentum of this book. About a hundred pages are devoted to describing James's progress from Scotland to England. This is done in EXCRUTIATING detail - daily entries on where he was, what he spent, and who he met up with (who always happens to be the third cousin of a servant who once served the grandmother of someone's secret mistress, or something to that effect). While I appreciate a wealth of detail in historic books, I don't need a day-by-day blow of his journey. I ended up skipping fifty or sixty pages just because I couldn't take it anymore.
The third part is at least readable, even if I did skim a few pages here and there. But on the whole, the book is just not very exciting, and the whole thing feels like one small chapter in a much grander story waiting to be told. Since this is Leanda's first novel, I guess I'm happy to report she improved by leaps and bounds with her second. Still this was a huge disappointment.
This book, on the other hand, has none of that. It is a look at how James succeeded Elizabeth, focusing on the pivotal year or two surrounding the event. There is nowhere near the level of intrigue - there's just a lot of plotting and many accusations of treason, but nothing much actually happens. For all that the author tries to convince us otherwise, James is clearly seen as the viable alternative.
The first part, which deals with the uncertainty surrounding the end of Elizabeth's reign, is at least somewhat interesting. But once she dies, so does the momentum of this book. About a hundred pages are devoted to describing James's progress from Scotland to England. This is done in EXCRUTIATING detail - daily entries on where he was, what he spent, and who he met up with (who always happens to be the third cousin of a servant who once served the grandmother of someone's secret mistress, or something to that effect). While I appreciate a wealth of detail in historic books, I don't need a day-by-day blow of his journey. I ended up skipping fifty or sixty pages just because I couldn't take it anymore.
The third part is at least readable, even if I did skim a few pages here and there. But on the whole, the book is just not very exciting, and the whole thing feels like one small chapter in a much grander story waiting to be told. Since this is Leanda's first novel, I guess I'm happy to report she improved by leaps and bounds with her second. Still this was a huge disappointment.
December 1, 2012
Disappointed. In social studies we were talking about the early colony of Jamestown being named after the new King James I of England. Prior to that, we had been discussing Queen Elizabeth and the expeditions to the Americas she was planning with her "buddy" Sir Walter Raleigh. Anyway, I had read a lot about Elizabeth, but thought this title sounded interesting because of the focus on that very specific time of her dying and not having an heir and James succeeding to the throne. I wanted to know more about this transfer of power. My students were curious, too. So I was excited to read it.
What happened? Well, in defense of this author - she knows her stuff. She included a helpful ancestry/descendant chart for the Tudor and Stuart monarchies, great photos, well-researched footnotes, and a comprehensive bibliography. HOWEVER, I found the book almost impossible to read. Stories were all over the place, descriptions were brief, players were many. She talked about every courtier, Earl, Duke, Lord, Secretary, etc. yet never connected them or made them feel "real". She would start on something interesting, like the strained relationship between the English and the Scots and James being a Scot, etc. and then never take it anywhere. Same thing with the whole Catholic vs. Church of England vs. Puritan issue playing out at that time. It was almost as if she had so much to say, but no focus and no depth.
From now on I will find other authors for my English history fix. I've seen and heard that Alison Weir is a good one - at least for the house of Tudor.
What happened? Well, in defense of this author - she knows her stuff. She included a helpful ancestry/descendant chart for the Tudor and Stuart monarchies, great photos, well-researched footnotes, and a comprehensive bibliography. HOWEVER, I found the book almost impossible to read. Stories were all over the place, descriptions were brief, players were many. She talked about every courtier, Earl, Duke, Lord, Secretary, etc. yet never connected them or made them feel "real". She would start on something interesting, like the strained relationship between the English and the Scots and James being a Scot, etc. and then never take it anywhere. Same thing with the whole Catholic vs. Church of England vs. Puritan issue playing out at that time. It was almost as if she had so much to say, but no focus and no depth.
From now on I will find other authors for my English history fix. I've seen and heard that Alison Weir is a good one - at least for the house of Tudor.
February 21, 2012
3.5 Stars - This was not as engaging to me as Lisle's The Sisters Who Would Be Queen, but the information and details were 5 stars. I learned a lot I didn't know about Elizabeth's successors and the people who surrounded her court at the end. Being non- fiction this is dry at parts, but page turning in other areas. I recommend this to anyone interested in this era and King James.
April 18, 2010
Oh my gosh. Will this book never end? I'm not a fan of the rabbit trails that take you back 100 years or move you forward 100 years and then abruptly drop you back into the time period where you left off. And I can't keep track of the multitudinous characters to save my life.
I am so very happy to have finished this book.
I am so very happy to have finished this book.
March 2, 2023
leanda de lisle knows how to make what might be a jumbled history into a followable narrative. This was a little bit light on James I and heavy on his courtiers and Elizabeth I but man is it cool to see how english protestantism was completely arbitrary and random
do not talk shit about james i to me he was literally neurodivergent gay and also a minor
do not talk shit about james i to me he was literally neurodivergent gay and also a minor
October 9, 2023
Tempests and Witches. Both shroud the dawn of the highly controversial Stuart era. What a truly punchy period of history. I was so fascinated to read about King James after reading a fictionalised version of him by Tracy Borman. I wanted to really know the man behind the famous witch-hunts and the “wisest fool in Christendom' with his famous slobbering jowls and offensive Scots tongue.
Wow was I impressed by the vast knowledge presented by historical writer Leanda De Isle. Why I love history so much is because these very real people who governed our country feel like characters from a book. They have the essence of dramatists putting on a long and very complex play.
Though most of England’s history reads a bit like a posh soap drama- I learnt more about James’ early life, including details of his relationship with his ill fated mother Mary Queen of Scots, than I have in any other book. An often taciturn man disturbed by his troubled and abrupt childhood; jostled between the violent nobles of Scotland who wanted to seize control of him. This was not a Prince sheltered from the plots and foibles in Scottish politics, but rather a boy forced to reckon with them.
One thing you learn from our royal history in particular is the way you play the hand is how your life is defined. I really do think King James is defined by his rule. The book definitely doesn’t dispel some of our pre-existing images of the Jacobean era. He ruled with an iron fist.
Most of the book details James’ ascension to the throne and his early influence as a new ruler. Though people threw bonfires to mark the occasion, many did not take kindly to a stranger from the perceived hostility of wild Scotland. Nor did they like his aversion to old Catholic practices. Nobody liked change. James was a staunch Protestant and a heavy drinker with a lively presence. Two failed rebellions happen in his early years before he is even officially crowned, one being the Bye Rebellion which I knew nothing about.
Huge power struggles all begin to take place. A game in which fortunes were made and countless lives were lost.
What I really found intriguing, and through what little is mentioned in this book, is that during Queen Elizabeth I’s reign Witchcraft was a felony. People really bought into supernatural stories. So by the time James came to the throne witchcraft was already a great spectacle. It’s no wonder there was a huge witch-hunt bubbling in his later years.
I was also delighted to learn that Elizabeth was reputed to have kept mirrors to “ not show her age” and “ both owned and gave away magic jewellery, such as a ring she had made for Essex to protect him from thieves”. If she really did have an interest in the magical arts, then she must have kept that under wraps . The origins of James’ iron fist are now evident.
Wow was I impressed by the vast knowledge presented by historical writer Leanda De Isle. Why I love history so much is because these very real people who governed our country feel like characters from a book. They have the essence of dramatists putting on a long and very complex play.
Though most of England’s history reads a bit like a posh soap drama- I learnt more about James’ early life, including details of his relationship with his ill fated mother Mary Queen of Scots, than I have in any other book. An often taciturn man disturbed by his troubled and abrupt childhood; jostled between the violent nobles of Scotland who wanted to seize control of him. This was not a Prince sheltered from the plots and foibles in Scottish politics, but rather a boy forced to reckon with them.
One thing you learn from our royal history in particular is the way you play the hand is how your life is defined. I really do think King James is defined by his rule. The book definitely doesn’t dispel some of our pre-existing images of the Jacobean era. He ruled with an iron fist.
Most of the book details James’ ascension to the throne and his early influence as a new ruler. Though people threw bonfires to mark the occasion, many did not take kindly to a stranger from the perceived hostility of wild Scotland. Nor did they like his aversion to old Catholic practices. Nobody liked change. James was a staunch Protestant and a heavy drinker with a lively presence. Two failed rebellions happen in his early years before he is even officially crowned, one being the Bye Rebellion which I knew nothing about.
Huge power struggles all begin to take place. A game in which fortunes were made and countless lives were lost.
What I really found intriguing, and through what little is mentioned in this book, is that during Queen Elizabeth I’s reign Witchcraft was a felony. People really bought into supernatural stories. So by the time James came to the throne witchcraft was already a great spectacle. It’s no wonder there was a huge witch-hunt bubbling in his later years.
I was also delighted to learn that Elizabeth was reputed to have kept mirrors to “ not show her age” and “ both owned and gave away magic jewellery, such as a ring she had made for Essex to protect him from thieves”. If she really did have an interest in the magical arts, then she must have kept that under wraps . The origins of James’ iron fist are now evident.
November 7, 2023
This was not what I was looking for. The book in itself is good but, for once, too much detailed for my taste. I was expecting a thorough study of the life of James I and not an extensive account of his accession to the English throne. If that's what you want to read about, then this book is for you, as I can say that it is well written and informative.
September 27, 2018
Solid and well-researched (appears to have used mostly primary sources), After Elizabeth stays focused on the subject, beginning with the declining years of Elizabeth's reign (with a corrupt and aging royal council still forbidden to discuss a successor to the increasingly ill and depressed monarch) and a brief biography of James Stewart's birth and tenure as James VI of Scotland. De Lisle describes the political maneuvering as the Elizabethan era draws to a close, with James being the primary, but hardly only, candidate, and James' wooing of pretty much all sides, making promises (esp. regarding religion) that he not only never intended, but, in many cases, would be impossible to fulfill. The death of the Queen actually increased, rather than ended, the political chaos, as the ruling class of England (especially Elizabeth's favorites) worked to maintain or increase their influence and wealth under the likely new king, with the understanding that backing the wrong side could be fatal. Even with James' triumphant progress to London, the plotting continued, with old allies betraying each other and conflict between various religious factions - including the Catholics who failed to agree on how to deal with the new regime (this lack of unity was to prove disastrous as they failed to engender confidence to outside powers while at the same time appearing as treasonous plotters in the eyes of Protestant England). This book continues to track the political and religious turmoil up through the failure of the "Bye" and "Main" plots and the subsequent trials and executions in 1603. De Lisle also includes analysis of James' fall from popularity in England, and the return of the view of Elizabeth's reign as a "Golden Age" (an attitude that had been, until her death, on the wane since the defeat of the Spanish Armada). After Elizabeth's death, this book primarily focuses on events and figures in England rather than Scotland, briefly dealing with some Scottish favorites and Queen Anne's conflict with Mar over the raising of Prince Henry. 3.5 stars.
October 18, 2009
Good biography. Enjoyed the intrigue, spying and of course beheadings.
Always wondered about King James.
Always wondered about King James.
August 18, 2011
Fascinating, complex as any modern thriller.
August 5, 2014
While the subject matter is fascinating, this book was a very hard read. It was not very engaging and took me some time to finish.
August 1, 2022
In the months leading up to the death of Queen Elizabeth I, her courtiers are all trying to win favor with the heir to her throne. But as Elizabeth, throughout her live, steadfastly refused to name an heir, the race is on - everyone has a favorite in mind and trying to further their cause or win favor with the one's they perceive to be in the lead.
When James I takes the throne, it is not at all a done deal. The book deals with the month's leading up to Elizabeth's dead and the year immediately following when James comes to power.
The country comes close to civil war and James quickly proves not to be the answer to the problems already plaguing the country.
Well written and kept my attention throughout.
When James I takes the throne, it is not at all a done deal. The book deals with the month's leading up to Elizabeth's dead and the year immediately following when James comes to power.
The country comes close to civil war and James quickly proves not to be the answer to the problems already plaguing the country.
Well written and kept my attention throughout.
December 22, 2025
In hindsight, the accession of James I after the death of Elizabeth looks smooth and preordained. In this history, however, it was anything but. James was just one of several potential candidates for the English throne and the one with the luck to have several powerful advisors on his side, at the crucial moment. Looked at through this lens, this moment in British history becomes a pivotal turning point, in which James of Scotland moved quickly to solidify his rule and sought to neutralize possible enemies - actions that are at odds with the typical portrayal of his character. Overall, a strong history and highly recommended for fans of the Tudor and Stuart eras.
July 6, 2019
BRB- I'm finding all the books I can on James' reign and his Queen.
March 20, 2009
Leanda De Lisle brings the reader to the time of Elizabeth's reign where all of her countrymen were wondering, "What happens, after Elizabeth?" in her debut book. Elizabeth was the daughter of the controversial Anne Boleyn and King Henry VIII, famous for having six wives. Henry declared Elizabeth illegitimate during his reign, through and Act of Parliament no less, which undoubtedly gave Elizabeth a complex. Once Elizabeth gained her throne, she ruled for 44 years; which was 44 years of wondering who would rule after Elizabeth. Normally these things would naturally work themselves out, through marriage and procreation. Yet, Elizabeth refused to marry, thus earning the nickname "The Virgin Queen", which put a damper on the possibilities of offspring. And Elizabeth effectively eliminated most of the other contenders of the throne who had some royal lineage; she scoped out the plotters to her throne and made sure she was quite secure throughout those 44 years with the help of her Cecil's. Leanda De Lisle explains the rival factions, the religious difficulties, and the summaries of the people who would be in line to the throne with just enough information to offer the reader a sense of the later years of Elizabeth's reign. The first half of the book comprises of the author touching on all of these aspects, which to a Tudor fan is nothing new. But she writes it effortlessly, attempting to not bog down the reader down with mountains of hard to follow facts. Oh, there are plenty of facts and a lot of information here but it fortunately does not read like a textbook. Some of the names come and go, which as always, the titles of the nobility can get cumbersome to follow. Who was Lord Cobham? I had to look that up since he came back a few times. (I really wish these types of books would have a chart other than the genealogy charts that would say, 'Northumberland' is 'this person(real name)' so I can gather relationships easier.)
Leanda then moves on to James I of Scotland, who does eventually get the crown of England, quite easily it seems. There is no struggle here until England realizes perhaps having a man to rule is not so great after all. We learn a bit more about James and his personal life, his habits, and his intellect. We get a sense of what Scotland felt to essentially lose their King to England, and how the English felt to get a Scottish King after years of Border Wars and hostility towards one another. The book then details the various plots and the plotters, notably Walter Ralegh, and their effects on England that occurred after James took the throne. The book picks up its pace once getting through the first half and where it picks up after Tudor books have left off.
The criticisms I DO have of the book are that I felt when the author was trying to convey a certain point she was telling a quick synposis of an event, that related to another event, which brought us to another.. I felt I had to keep track of the dates because there was a bit of jumping around in the timeline. This happened a lot and always aggravated me. I wish it were a bit more straightforward.
Also, whereas I found this book to be an engaging read for the most part, most of the information may not be new to the British history buff, and could become a bore if looking for "new" insights especially regarding Elizabeth. The way that the author flings about the names of the effected people, it would be hard to keep up if you have not already read a few other books of the era. The author in no way "goes slow" with us as far as name dropping. And then there were some slow parts, like James' very expensive journey through England to ascend to the throne; the author comprised it of mini-stories weaving in and out.
Upon finishing the book I find myself more interested in doing some followup reading on some of the supporting characters that Leanda De Lisle touched upon. I have read several novels and biographies on Elizabeth and yet still enjoyed Leanda De Lisle's telling of it perhaps because of the enormous amount of details. Because of the differences in laws between Scotland and England, it was interesting to see how James changed things and how England's nobility reacted. I also enjoyed the color pictures, there were some that I had not seen before. This is not a light read, there is a ton of information here, so don't start this unless you are planning on devoting some time to it. This took me about two weeks to read.
I give it 3.5 out of 5 stars = Good, and Recommended for those interested in just the facts regarding the transition from Elizabeth I to James I, and England's journey to becoming part of the United Kingdom.
Leanda then moves on to James I of Scotland, who does eventually get the crown of England, quite easily it seems. There is no struggle here until England realizes perhaps having a man to rule is not so great after all. We learn a bit more about James and his personal life, his habits, and his intellect. We get a sense of what Scotland felt to essentially lose their King to England, and how the English felt to get a Scottish King after years of Border Wars and hostility towards one another. The book then details the various plots and the plotters, notably Walter Ralegh, and their effects on England that occurred after James took the throne. The book picks up its pace once getting through the first half and where it picks up after Tudor books have left off.
The criticisms I DO have of the book are that I felt when the author was trying to convey a certain point she was telling a quick synposis of an event, that related to another event, which brought us to another.. I felt I had to keep track of the dates because there was a bit of jumping around in the timeline. This happened a lot and always aggravated me. I wish it were a bit more straightforward.
Also, whereas I found this book to be an engaging read for the most part, most of the information may not be new to the British history buff, and could become a bore if looking for "new" insights especially regarding Elizabeth. The way that the author flings about the names of the effected people, it would be hard to keep up if you have not already read a few other books of the era. The author in no way "goes slow" with us as far as name dropping. And then there were some slow parts, like James' very expensive journey through England to ascend to the throne; the author comprised it of mini-stories weaving in and out.
Upon finishing the book I find myself more interested in doing some followup reading on some of the supporting characters that Leanda De Lisle touched upon. I have read several novels and biographies on Elizabeth and yet still enjoyed Leanda De Lisle's telling of it perhaps because of the enormous amount of details. Because of the differences in laws between Scotland and England, it was interesting to see how James changed things and how England's nobility reacted. I also enjoyed the color pictures, there were some that I had not seen before. This is not a light read, there is a ton of information here, so don't start this unless you are planning on devoting some time to it. This took me about two weeks to read.
I give it 3.5 out of 5 stars = Good, and Recommended for those interested in just the facts regarding the transition from Elizabeth I to James I, and England's journey to becoming part of the United Kingdom.
April 7, 2016
I've read so much about the Tudors and all the troubles with keeping the line of succession to the throne of England, it was only natural that I would be curious about the history of what happened when the last Tudor died childless. After Elizabeth is a non-fiction account of that era.
Queen Elizabeth spent her early life in the upheaval of a British Monarchy that lacked a legitimate male heir. In order to bring peace and prevent the turmoil that plagued her father, Elizabeth Tudor declined to marry, instead claiming herself devoted to England. Queen Elizabeth never did name an heir, and there was no clear line of succession. She did, however, eliminate many possible heirs by imprisoning or executing them if it appeared they were trying to usurp the throne or gain too much power.
Despite history's view of her reign as glorious, the last years of Elizabeth's life showed much discontent in England, and though talk of the succession was viewed as treason, secret discussions did ensue. One such group were supporters of James of Scotland, the Protestant son of Elizabeth's cousin, Mary Queen of Scots. It is interesting to note that despite a British law excluding him from the throne, his acceptance as Britain's King happened very quickly and with much agreement from the ruling class.
The book goes on to relate the disappointments in the new king, from his continued persecution of Catholics, his largesse to the Scottish nobles at the expense of the treasury, and his insistence of uniting England and Scotland.
There were highlights of interest in this book, but there was also a lot of filler that was not particularly interesting to me. Either the succession of King James left little written history, or else this writer had a difficult time making this story appeal to me. 2 1/2 stars.
Queen Elizabeth spent her early life in the upheaval of a British Monarchy that lacked a legitimate male heir. In order to bring peace and prevent the turmoil that plagued her father, Elizabeth Tudor declined to marry, instead claiming herself devoted to England. Queen Elizabeth never did name an heir, and there was no clear line of succession. She did, however, eliminate many possible heirs by imprisoning or executing them if it appeared they were trying to usurp the throne or gain too much power.
Despite history's view of her reign as glorious, the last years of Elizabeth's life showed much discontent in England, and though talk of the succession was viewed as treason, secret discussions did ensue. One such group were supporters of James of Scotland, the Protestant son of Elizabeth's cousin, Mary Queen of Scots. It is interesting to note that despite a British law excluding him from the throne, his acceptance as Britain's King happened very quickly and with much agreement from the ruling class.
The book goes on to relate the disappointments in the new king, from his continued persecution of Catholics, his largesse to the Scottish nobles at the expense of the treasury, and his insistence of uniting England and Scotland.
There were highlights of interest in this book, but there was also a lot of filler that was not particularly interesting to me. Either the succession of King James left little written history, or else this writer had a difficult time making this story appeal to me. 2 1/2 stars.
August 19, 2018
I've been making my way through Leanda de Lisle's books, though not in the order that she wrote them as I started first with The White King, then Tudor, and now have just finished After Elizabeth, which is actually the first book she wrote. This time I was a little disappointed. The strength of The White King and Tudor is de Lisle's ability not to get lost in the details of the stories. She covers long periods—all of Charles I's reign in The White King and a period that includes the reigns of five monarchs in Tudor. In this book her focus is largely the years immediately preceding the death of Elizabeth I in 1603 until James VI and I's rule is solidly established. Perhaps de Lisle is a better storyteller when she has a bigger story to tell. In After Elizabeth, too often she is writing about some minor character in one of the several plots to deny James the crown. You are introduced to someone you may have never heard of before and often five pages later you wonder if you need to really remember that anecdote.
In the final chapter, there's a hint of the de Lisle I recognize from her other volumes in which she discusses the general dim view of James's reign and how the elevation of Elizabeth into an iconic figure was often motivated by a desire to denigrate him. Her incapacity to be an effective leader at the end of her reign is forgotten. De Lisle covers what James achieved—peace internationally and at least a temporary calm when it came to the issues dividing Anglicans, Puritans, Presbyterians, and Catholics—in one chapter. )His efforts to unite England, Scotland, and Ireland were less successful.) It takes a long time, however, to get to that chapter, and most of the book requires paying close attention as battles and intrigues are discussed in sometimes numbing detail.
In the final chapter, there's a hint of the de Lisle I recognize from her other volumes in which she discusses the general dim view of James's reign and how the elevation of Elizabeth into an iconic figure was often motivated by a desire to denigrate him. Her incapacity to be an effective leader at the end of her reign is forgotten. De Lisle covers what James achieved—peace internationally and at least a temporary calm when it came to the issues dividing Anglicans, Puritans, Presbyterians, and Catholics—in one chapter. )His efforts to unite England, Scotland, and Ireland were less successful.) It takes a long time, however, to get to that chapter, and most of the book requires paying close attention as battles and intrigues are discussed in sometimes numbing detail.
December 9, 2024
Unfortunately I was disappointed a bit as I've wanted to read this for ages. I felt like it would have given more insight into James and his relationship with his mother (not just literally their relationship but also more clues on his personal views and potentially even guilt regarding his mother which in my opinion changed drastically after the succession) . Mary didn't even make the picture sections at all which was a bit upsetting for me (not the actual lack of picture but evasion of her entirely) as I feel like this book missed a huge part of the story of the succession. I struggled a lot through the last half and honestly I am giving it four stars even though I have written a poor review not because it's a bad book but the material does not actually do anything but literally discuss a few half assed plots and then a bunch of boring coronation detail which is nice but this was literally one of the biggest topicd in the book as well as forgettable information about his knighting random nobodies. I went into it thinking that maybe there was some interesting struggle worth an entire book but finished quite disappointed. The information is all quality and there is a great amount of information well sourced about various aspects of the immediate period after Elizabeth's death. Unfortunately there isn't really much of an interesting story and I didn't learn anything particularly ground breaking or new. I actually liked the first half of the book the second half was only finished because all my other books are in storage while I moved houses and I physically couldn't read something more interesting unless I went to buy it lol
October 24, 2007
This is a very readable and enjoyable piece of history specifically related to the period of turnover in England when Elizabeth I died and James of Scotland came to the English throne. It starts with a very helpful history of what politically occurred in Scotland before and during James VI's childhood in relation to England, mostly regarding Mary, Queen of Scots (who, by all accounts, was quite a piece of work). Then we shift to how England was economically and politically during Elizabeth's last years, how she named her successor on her deathbed, and the constant shifting of the court to whoever they thought would succeed. Then we focus to James' succession, his ride down to London, his impression upon the English people (not quite as favorable as Elizabeth) and his political acts upon setting up his new court (awarding large swaths of stuff to Scots). There is a section involving the whole nastiness with a Catholic plot uncovered very early in his reign that involved Sir Walter Ralegh (to his infamy). In totality this volume studies James' character, his personal flaws, his children, his friends, his contemporaries, his wife and the effects of his reign on the hearts and minds of what he hoped would become the British people. It finishes up with his crowning as King and a brief history of what follows, touching upon the Gunpowder plot but never actually covering it. But very knowledgable and very easy to read.
September 12, 2010
I always wondered what happened during the period between Elizabeth I's death and James VI's coronation.
This book answered my questions. It explained the various plots and twists between the faction who wanted James and those who didn't want a "foreigner" to be their King. The book also described the last years of Elizabeth I's reign - the corruption and poverty and that much of the Nobility were ready for a change.
I'd heard of James as being described as an imbecile who was more interested in his young men than matters of state. The author, Leanda de Lisle, described James's physical characteristics and mannerisms and then compared them with ADHD and cerebral palsy. It was very interesting. She also wrote about his great intelligence as well as his utter lack of caring for his subjects. (He felt he was King by the grace of God and how his subjects felt didn't matter).
I always thought James's cousin, Arbella Stuart, had died young. I had no idea she was used (sometimes willingly) as a pawn for a faction of the Nobles and/or Catholics who wanted her to be Queen instead of the "foreigner" James. Arbella is a sad figure in history.
Also, the photos in the book were plentiful - many in color.
This book answered my questions. It explained the various plots and twists between the faction who wanted James and those who didn't want a "foreigner" to be their King. The book also described the last years of Elizabeth I's reign - the corruption and poverty and that much of the Nobility were ready for a change.
I'd heard of James as being described as an imbecile who was more interested in his young men than matters of state. The author, Leanda de Lisle, described James's physical characteristics and mannerisms and then compared them with ADHD and cerebral palsy. It was very interesting. She also wrote about his great intelligence as well as his utter lack of caring for his subjects. (He felt he was King by the grace of God and how his subjects felt didn't matter).
I always thought James's cousin, Arbella Stuart, had died young. I had no idea she was used (sometimes willingly) as a pawn for a faction of the Nobles and/or Catholics who wanted her to be Queen instead of the "foreigner" James. Arbella is a sad figure in history.
Also, the photos in the book were plentiful - many in color.
March 21, 2014
Ever since I was a small child I loved stories about Elizabeth I, even though she lived over four centuries ago. My brother checked this out from the library and I decided to include it in my weekly academics!
...And it wasn't half bad.
It strikes me like Leanda de Lisle has a soft spot for James I, as many historians do for other characters. After all, it certainly does less to demonize the first Stuart king than many other historical recountings of that period.
It was fascinating to witness through the paper the events that were struck into flame when Elizabeth died and a Scot became the king.
It develops the political period, focusing chiefly on the royalty and pretenders to the throne, rather than the populace the monarchs ruled. That is both a blessing and a curse, really!
Scattered throughout are stirring, lovely, really, bits and bobs from Elizabethan England. The wit, the times, the tragedy, are exhibited sparingly, all the better to appreciate it.
Unconsciously, amazingly, adverbially, elucidating, this is a marvellously lucid although occasionally thick and dull book on the times after Elizabeth. Best read chapter-by-chapter. 3.5. stars.
...And it wasn't half bad.
It strikes me like Leanda de Lisle has a soft spot for James I, as many historians do for other characters. After all, it certainly does less to demonize the first Stuart king than many other historical recountings of that period.
It was fascinating to witness through the paper the events that were struck into flame when Elizabeth died and a Scot became the king.
It develops the political period, focusing chiefly on the royalty and pretenders to the throne, rather than the populace the monarchs ruled. That is both a blessing and a curse, really!
Scattered throughout are stirring, lovely, really, bits and bobs from Elizabethan England. The wit, the times, the tragedy, are exhibited sparingly, all the better to appreciate it.
Unconsciously, amazingly, adverbially, elucidating, this is a marvellously lucid although occasionally thick and dull book on the times after Elizabeth. Best read chapter-by-chapter. 3.5. stars.
January 12, 2015
I've never had much knowledge of the actual events of the transition of power: I knew about the plots beforehand and then James I's kingship, but the rest was a blank.
My big takeaways here are that James wasn't nearly so awful in Scotland, that he was corrupted by the English court, and that he could be, at times, really witty. I can also see why Charles I wanted a family life that looked nothing like the one he'd had.
The best parts here are--as with most histories--when we have real evidence, however biased the sources (and de Lisle does a good job of pointing those out). I cringed at the 400-year-old possible diagnosis of ADHD; a little over the top, since we already over diagnose it when we have the patients before us in the 21st century, and coulda/shoulda/woulda only takes you so far.
Certainly worth your time. It bogs down once James is crowned--I'm not sure inclusion of the various Catholic sects/plots were necessary (they never posed any real threat to James) although it was interesting to see the other side of Raleigh's sentence and imprisonment.
My big takeaways here are that James wasn't nearly so awful in Scotland, that he was corrupted by the English court, and that he could be, at times, really witty. I can also see why Charles I wanted a family life that looked nothing like the one he'd had.
The best parts here are--as with most histories--when we have real evidence, however biased the sources (and de Lisle does a good job of pointing those out). I cringed at the 400-year-old possible diagnosis of ADHD; a little over the top, since we already over diagnose it when we have the patients before us in the 21st century, and coulda/shoulda/woulda only takes you so far.
Certainly worth your time. It bogs down once James is crowned--I'm not sure inclusion of the various Catholic sects/plots were necessary (they never posed any real threat to James) although it was interesting to see the other side of Raleigh's sentence and imprisonment.
August 13, 2016
It's a bit hard to follow if you don't already know who the main actors were in this political play --and convoluted even if you do-- but that's history.
De Lisle does a very good job of weighing the Elizabethan and Jacobean periods and finding the stronger and weaker points in both, especially in relation to one another. This book is unique because, as opposed to other books on Elizabeth or any given monarch, they are 500-plus page behemoths, and this one tackles an important issue that is usually overlooked, overshadowed as it is by Elizabeth's long and famous reign. The transition between the Tudor and the Stuart house is very revealing of the times and conditions in the early 17th century, economically, poitically and socially. Throw in the plague and this almost reads like fiction.
The last page is a concise evaluation of the subjective injustices of history and it sums up what went wrong with James's reign and how most of it was not even his fault.
De Lisle does a very good job of weighing the Elizabethan and Jacobean periods and finding the stronger and weaker points in both, especially in relation to one another. This book is unique because, as opposed to other books on Elizabeth or any given monarch, they are 500-plus page behemoths, and this one tackles an important issue that is usually overlooked, overshadowed as it is by Elizabeth's long and famous reign. The transition between the Tudor and the Stuart house is very revealing of the times and conditions in the early 17th century, economically, poitically and socially. Throw in the plague and this almost reads like fiction.
The last page is a concise evaluation of the subjective injustices of history and it sums up what went wrong with James's reign and how most of it was not even his fault.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 95 reviews