This book was not made for atheists or deep thinkers
It’s been years since I read this, but I still have the original book and all (and I mean ALL) of my meticulous notes. This book was a mandatory read for an equally mandatory ‘Religion’ credit. A class, which sought to answer the question “Why Catholicism” before pursuing anything remotely involving a true religious studies course.
My main problem with the book is that, like most religious texts I've read, it seeks to provide a rational for the author’s world view by cherrypicking specific aspects of other religions and science to rationalize the a priori conclusion. I don’t have time to outline the contradictions that arise from this ‘top-down’ form of logic, but this is how you get sentences like “If Jesus was fully human, he must have had sexual desires” (pg. 154). When, in fact, research conducted by Alfred Kinsey would suggest this conclusion can’t be assumed.
The author did provide several shockingly accurate statements (imo). Like, “When most Christians claim hey want to live the sort of life Jesus led, they haven’t read the Gospel recently” (pg. 135). However, these moments are rare and fleeting.
The main reason for the 1-star review because to the a priori assumptions mixed with a cannibalizing of other religions to rationalize the aforementioned assumptions. At times, this approach makes the author seem like a Universalist and at others a Taoist. In short, this book sounds like it’s written by someone who isn’t a philosopher, but wants to be.