I think this is a must read. To me, Kamenetz's big assumption is that education is a social good for society, so society should invest in its students and not overburden them with debt, when they seek education. However, I am not sure that the primary beneficiary of education is society instead of the individual. It's seems to me that most people seek a job/degree that will make them the most money that they can make comfortably with some enjoyment, so the primary beneficiary is the student. But if society benefits from our education in some way, then society should provide better primary education first of all.
I wonder why Kamenetz didn't focus much on students' choice major/concentration. It seems clear to me that paying 20 k a year on tuition for a bachelor degree is worth it, but only if you intend to make 80 K per anum after maybe 2-3 years working after graduation, which few do. Plus, brand name is super important for getting a job these days, in certain parts of the country, but not everywhere.
Kamenetz made a point in asking, "Where did all the good jobs go?" but why not also ask basically who it is that makes a lot of money, and why. (Engineers think they are safe, but that is because lot's of former jobs are done by an engineer now, replaces a handful of workers. And the more engineers who graduate, the less they will all make in the field. I also wondered why Kamenetz didn't dive into the question of why women are going into fields and studying majors that guarantee less income after graduation. Women are blindly flooding the marketplace in the care-fields, lowering wages, or maybe this is the way capitalism treats the 'care-industry', since no one can measure productivity and reward good workers.
Kamenetz also praises countries with more vocational opportunities and serious school tracking, which also tend to have almost-free tuition at universities. But, I've studied at a European university and the quality of instruction and the seriousness of students is not the same as the private IVY league university I know from the US. So, how did the US get that quality, and does paying (more) for education affect the quality of education? I'm not totally convinced that free education is the solution, or that society benefits from my education. If society does benefit, then society needs to pay my loans, or regulate pricing at universities, no matter whether unis want to be for-profit.