Re-read: August 2020
🔹 Overall feelings:
〰 Alright, where to start?
I first read this book about 5 years ago and I loved it. Although I had certain issues with it at the time (and I still have the same issues today), I have to admit that they never deterred from my overall enjoyment of this book which is why i’ve given it such a high rating. Although some things still grate on my nerves, the nostalgia that I feel when I think of this book will always ensure that it has a special place in my heart (as this is one of the first books that I ever read when I first started becoming a bookworm). That said, let’s get into reviewing this novel:
🔹 What I liked:
〰 If there’s one reason that could explain why I hold this book in such high regards its this: the characters are unlike any other historical romance characters i’ve ever read about. If you’ve read this novel you’re probably disagreeing with me about this statement but just hear me out. This is the only novel that I’ve ever read in which both main characters represent the stereotypical versions of the males/females of their time period. Usually, when I read historical romances, which I admit is quite often, we ALWAYS get this revolutionary female lead whose unlike all other females of her time (in the sense that she’s clever, witty and a feminist). We also get males that are extremely open-minded and see their spouses as their equal (which, of course they should, but if you look at the time period that just wasn’t the case for most men). The reason authors do this is because they want contemporary audiences to be able to actually like their female and male leads. And let’s be honest, we would never be able to actually root for a man who sees his wife as his inferior, or even for a women who makes us want to rip our hair out. That said, the reason I appreciate this author so much is because she gave us leads that actually fit well with what history told us about men and women of the 19th century. For instance...
🔹 Sarah:
〰 Meet sarah, our sweet, naive, trusting and VERY dependent female lead. She’s extremely stereotypical in the sense that she cries every two seconds and faints once or twice in this novel. She doesn’t believe that she needs to learn how to defend herself (or how to do anything really) as it is her husband’s duty to protect her at all costs. She’s a romantic at heart and has been in love with her husband for years now even though she only met him once when she was four years old. She’s absolutely convinced that her husband loves her back even though the latter has never said or done anything to indicate as much. Finally, she decides to make it her mission throughout the novel to show him how lucky he is to have her as his wife (she literally says those exact same words to him). That said, she’s a bad liar and often misses obvious stuff that happen right in front of her which, obviously, makes her seem kinda dumb sometimes.
〰 Although a description such as this one might make you change your mind about reading this book, I can guarantee that all of sarah’s flaws soon become quite endearing (even if a bit frustrating at times). The fact that she realizes at the end of the book just how dependent she makes herself ought to be also helps us as readers like her even more. Although she’s genuinely very sweet and kind hearted, her naivety never really bothered me since, as I mentioned previously, it added to the whole stereotypical image that I had of her (and that I found quite refreshing since, for once, I found that I was reading a historical novel with a character that’s very different from myself or from all women of my time period. That made the whole “historical” element seem more real and feel really well done in my opinion).
🔹 Nathan:
〰 Meet Nathan, a man who upon first meeting can only be described as a brute. This gem right here can be seen as stereotypical in the sense that his views about marriage belong very much to men of the early nineteenth century. He very much believes that his wife is not as clever as him (at least in the beginning) and does several things throughout the novel to remind her that since he’s the man in the relationship, he should get the last word in... well, everything really. He’s extremely cold towards his wife at first and is often irritated with her dramatics to the point where he might seem a bit of an ass to be honest.
〰 Nathan changes a bit throughout the course of this book of course but I still wish that he had groveled a bit more towards the end. I find that Sarah forgave him wayyy too quickly to be honest. And since we were often privy to his thoughts about his wife, it got to a point where I genuinely felt like Sarah deserved better since he seemed so unfeeling and unsympathetic at times. I still liked him but just not as much as I liked his wife.
🔹 Final thoughts:
〰 All that being said, the writing style was great, the dialogue was entertaining and let’s not forget that this book definitely made me laugh out loud NUMEROUS times which is always great (and never easy to do). In conclusion, I definitely recommend it and although it’s not the best historical romance that I’ve ever read, I have to say that it’s one that I often think about and that will always hold a special place in my heart.