This is a series of essays written between approximately 2008 - 2012, intended to provide a fun examination of the sport and its ideas, theories, and evolution. The lion’s share of the essays open with narratives about specific college and NFL coaches and what they’ve contributed to the game. Imo, this was a bit too verbose and many of the concepts were obscurely described or too arcane for the casual fan. However, two concepts were explained rather well.
The 1st is Urban Meyer’s Spread Offense:
If the defense (D) plays with two safeties (S) back - so long as the offense forces the D to cover its receivers (WRs) by employing constraint plays like bubble screens - the offense has a numbers advantage up front to run the ball. An athletic quarterback (QB) who can run creates the disparity.
If there is only one deep S then having a WR who can beat the corner (CB) will be integral. Against soft coverage the offense will throw underneath. Against tight coverage the offense will thrive on quick outside throws to the flats or deep balls.
If there is no deep S (i.e., Cover 0), then perpetually exploit the WR / CB mismatch.
The 2nd is about Cover 1, and its derivative Cover 1 Robber (often employed by Nick Saban):
Basic Cover 1 is with one deep (S) in the middle of the field with the rest of the WRs covered man-to-man. This deep S has to be a great center fielder who can both stop the deep ball as well as cover sideline to sideline. This type of coverage allows the D to put Eight-in-the-box, pressuring the QB and stopping the run game. When the offense has to throw (e.g., on third down and long), the D can creatively blitz while still locking up the WRs.
Cover 1 Robber is similar, except that there are only four rushers while another defender (most often the middle linebacker (the Mike) sits at an intermediate level and reads the QB’s eyes to “rob” any pass routes over the middle. This variation is useful against the Spread Offense discussed above because the Mike can also spy QBs who like to run.
Author Chris Brown is a lawyer by trade, and believes that both coaching and law school don’t necessarily teach the game or the law, but instead how to problem solve.