2.75/5
There's a cliche in book circles that movie adaptations are never as good as their source material. With Hunter Killer, first published as Firing Point, there's an exception to that perceived wisdom. Now, that isn't to say that the 2012 novel isn't a good techno-thriller on the page, which is true of its second half. Unfortunately for novel and readers alike, authors George Wallace and Don Keith's attempt to secure a place as heirs to Tom Clancy has more than its fair share of misfires.
The biggest is that, at 704 pages, the novel is about twice as long as it needs to be. That's partly due to a 300 plus page opening that takes way too long to set the main plot in motion but also includes a Wall Street-based plotline that frankly adds nothing but unnecessary pages to an already overlong novel. That attempt to emulate Clancy's intricate plotting also means that the book has as many POV characters as it has submarines, which becomes a lot to keep up with when the pace picks up in the second half. In some ways, the best decision of the screen adaptation made was streamlining the plot, something one wishes its original writers had done, along with dumping much of the wooden and cliched dialogue.
Which isn't to entirely write off the novel, I hasten to add. Wallace, a former submarine captain, puts his knowledge on display throughout, giving the best parts of the book a nice air of authenticity. Perhaps unsurprising for a techno-thriller, it's at its best in its action sequence with pulse-pounding submarine and special forces operations that keep the pages turning.
Which makes it a shame that those sequences aren't sandwiched between something better than too many plots and characters with strained dialogue. While Hunter Killer/Firing Point isn't a bad read, it's not an especially great one either. And if you've seen the movie (which is a fine cinematic techno-thriller), you wouldn't be missing much by giving this a miss. That said, die-hard fans of the genre will get the most of it, I suspect.