In her way Ita Buttrose is as influential in the media industry in Australia as Oprah Winfrey was in America. The main differences between the two women is that while one began humbly at the age of fifteen as a copywriter for a magazine, the other began her television career after some higher education a few years older. One spent much of her life working within the businesses of others, and dealing with their working conditions on her own as a pioneer for women. The other more readily drew a team around her to create her own brand and business. Theses differences are partly due to timing, but more likely due to the cultural differences of America and Australia. But both women by hard work and a clear idea of their own ambitions to apply themselves to the best of their potential, became much-loved voices sought out by their communities to raise the issues which needed to be heard.
While Ita may not be recognised readily around the world the way Oprah is, she has still had a number of significant roles on the international stage. Where Oprah has gone into African villages and built schools and housing out of her own considerable wealth, Ita has been appointed by the government as a consultant on AIDS and travelled both to gather information and first-hand experience, as well as to disseminate important information back to the Australian public.
To reach such a position of trust and recognition has not been an easy task.
But the main way in which Ita has achieved it is through her personality. Her curiosity, intelligence, warmth, and willingness to ask tough questions and well as report on more mundane subjects, has endeared her to generations of Australians beginning with her work at the Australia Women’s Weekly. Where others seem to have been taken for granted by their continued employment in the one place, Ita made choices which kept her fresh as well as connected. She travelled to London early, and later returned more able to add to a previous employer than she would have by remaining with them. She used every opportunity to learn as much as she could from those around her, and such interest and respect stood her in good stead when she required further advice or mentoring. But also became the base for her deepest friendships.
Meanwhile she also steered an interesting course in a male world where criticism was as likely from other women as challenges by men threatened by a competent woman. Her own integrity and belief in her own values guided her. And this could only be developed through asking her questions one at a time and seeing for herself what answers she could produce.
Like most young girls of her time she believed she would leave work and raise a family once she married. Not only did the circumstances of her early married life make it impractical, her husband was also aware later that she wouldn’t remain home with the children and be fully satisfied within herself. He was the one who encouraged her back to work.
Just as well she had such encouragement, but also such strength within herself. By the time Ita was running, not just the magazine but the whole women’s department for Australian consolidated Press, she was also working as a single parent much of the time.
Ita was not just part of a revolution in women’s lifestyle, but she was at the epicentre of discussion around all the issues which were raised by such change. From actively seeking out the best contacts for stories, she became the go=to person for those who wanted to be part of such discussions. Such a position gave her an immense amount of power – despite still being employed by men.
Then she bravely stepped out and challenged herself again. She set up her own magazine. Like Oprah, it made sense that it should bear her own name, simply Ita.
In many ways by now she was her own brand, and what she stood for was very clear from a number of perspectives. Yet the comfort of others to go with her was challenged by more than the issues she was raising in a society reluctant to face its own changes. There was also a recession.
Surprisingly such a challenge financially to people seems to send them back into more entrenched opinions. Survival mode brings out a rigidity of response. All these years later you would have thought we would have begun to understand that when change is demanded you have to go with it to survive, and indeed to thrive. But we still look for certainties when there can be none.
Some people might consider Ita lucky at this time to have had a silent and extremely supportive backer. But I don’t consider it as luck at all. I consider it an astute businessman who valued what Ita offered to all of us that we were not brave enough in large enough numbers to support ourselves yet. She had earned her credibility and so she was afforded credit for it by someone who could support it.
But I think it is interesting that it was so difficult for Ita to see for herself why things weren’t working better for herself at that time as well. In recent times I have come across a profiling system called Wealth Dynamics (for entrepreneurs) or Talent Dynamics (for corporate teams). It refers Oprah as one of the examples of the profile called ‘Star’. I have no doubt this is Ita’s profile as well. But in running her own business at Capricorn Press I think she attempted to fit more into a Creator role, and this took her out of her own flow.
I am not saying Ita is not creative – far from it. All I am saying is that it is not her strongest alignment. Her team worked best around her when she concentrated on the people relationships, and found others to take care of some of the detailed processes for her. A matter of efficiency for those rising to the top of their field.
(for more information about Talent Dynamics email me. I will have more reviews related to Wealth Dynamics and Talent Dynamics coming shortly)