Thanks to this book I now know rather more about many things which I didn't know much about before. These things include (in roughly sequential order): the inner workings of the Australian Classification and Media Authority; the retail and distribution of offline adult material in Australia; the vast assortment of people from both ends of the political spectrum and everywhere in between who advocate higher or stricter or better enforced censorship in Australia; Sexpo; the Eros Association; assorted activist individuals and movements of the 60s/70s sexual and social liberation in Australia; gonzo porn; the Northern Territory Intervention; neo-liberal social economics. Other topics covered, upon which I was pretty well informed to begin with and haven't gone away vastly more so (but you might!) include: sex-positive feminism, history and development of; arguments in favour of porn in general and non-censorship in particular; the Australian Sex Party; chastity advocates and evangelical Christians; why internet filtering cannae work; and the difference between actual child abuse (mostly in-family) and Fear of Predators on the Internet.
So, I learned a lot of interesting stuff! I was also impressed with the way Sparrow put this together.
- Narrative style: it's what is apparently called 'narrative non-fiction'. One presumes Sparrow bumbled around the country for some years, researching everything he could about porn and censorship, and then grinding out his findings in a book. It *reads*, however, not as an essay or a series of arguments, but as a sort of travelogue. Each chapter has a coherent theme, and there's a clear progression of information and critique through the book (for instance, he'll refer to interviews which 'happened' in the previous chapter, and introduce new arguments/evidence which relate to the current chapter). What they don't have is a thesis-first approach, a 'here's what I'm going to say and here's me saying it' structure. Instead, Sparrow has spent a lot of time carefully crafting this story so it *feels* like a steadily-evolving train of thought.
- Treatment of different perspectives: Sparrow makes no bones about his own political, liberal background, or the fact that he's interviewing, say, Fiona Patten from a position of far greater common ground than he has with Melinda Tankard-Riest. But he says he took care to represent the arguments of all parties fairly and concisely: I think he did more. I think he drew out what was good and laudable out of each interviewee's perspective, and consistently critiqued all 'sides' of the debate. He's certainly not more critical of liberal-to-libertarian perspectives than he is of the conservatives - in fact, I think he's more so, obviously irritated by the failure of most pro-porn activists to offer actual solutions to the sexism and racism of the industry.
- Social conscious and clarity of thought: Sparrow's interests or investments, the common themes which come up in every chapter and in many interviews, are consistent and laudable. He's concerned about individual liberties; about the fact that minorities so often bear the brunt of censorship; about sexism and racism as social ills; about the physical and mental well-being of the young. He shows great sympathy, for instance, for the picture of traumatised/struggling adolescents growing up with raunch culture, as outlined by Tankard-Reist - at the same time as he questions the anecdotal nature of her information. He makes consistent distinctions between individual liberties and systemic prejudice, between an individual's right to film or watch violent pornography and the fact that this pans out as a consistent pattern of male dominance and female submission in the vast majority of porn.
- Perception. Sparrow just struck me as very perceptive. He made links you don't often see made - for instance, he cottoned on to the fact that chastity movements are very much a product of contemporary culture, and that their appeal lies in offering a straightforward answer to the conflicting and often scary demands placed on young people by a hypersexualised culture. I also found his commentary on views of pornography in remote indigenous communities (where X-rated material was generally unavailable even BEFORE the Intervention) to be insightful, but I didn't have a solid grounding before reading this, so perhaps it isn't. And the big structural link which underpins the whole book - that the union anti-pornography activists from the left and right is facilitated because both, in this current environment, accept basic market economics and the authority of the state. On the other 'side', he critiques the difference between modern sex-positive stances (if it's fun, do it!) and the anti-capitalist liberal movements of the 70s. I think he missed something here: there are, after all, plenty of clusters of anti-capitalist sex-positive people out there. But I think he's right insofar as the anti-capitalist part of sexual liberation never became mainstream, and what you end up with is, well, Sexpo.
- Conclusion: I'm just thoroughly impressed with Sparrow, who's obviously a child of the 70s, and politically aligned with the sexual and social liberation politics of that period, for managing to end on a happy note. He talks about the downfall of a movement he was party to, but he ends on an open-ended desire to see what we might make of sex, sexuality and freedom of the press beyond market economics. Take ten points, Mr Sparrow, you're well ahead of most adults of your generation whom I know.