What do you think?
Rate this book
Glad to the Brink of Fear: A Portrait of Ralph Waldo Emerson
An engaging reassessment of the celebrated essayist and his relevance to contemporary readers
More than two centuries after his birth, Ralph Waldo Emerson remains one of the presiding spirits in American culture. Yet his reputation as the starry-eyed prophet of self-reliance has obscured a much more complicated figure who spent a lifetime wrestling with injustice, philosophy, art, desire, and suffering. James Marcus introduces readers to this Emerson, a writer of self-interrogating genius whose visionary flights are always grounded in Yankee shrewdness.
This Emerson is a rebel. He is also a lover, a friend, a husband, and a father. Having declared his great topic to be “the infinitude of the private man,” he is nonetheless an intensely social being who develops Transcendentalism in the company of Henry David Thoreau, Margaret Fuller, Bronson Alcott, and Theodore Parker. And although he resists political activism early on—hoping instead for a revolution in consciousness—the burning issue of slavery ultimately transforms him from cloistered metaphysician to fiery abolitionist.
Drawing on telling episodes from Emerson’s life alongside landmark essays like “Self-Reliance,” “Experience,” and “Circles,” Glad to the Brink of Fear reveals how Emerson shares our preoccupations with fate and freedom, race and inequality, love and grief. It shows, too, how his desire to see the world afresh, rather than accepting the consensus view, is a lesson that never grows old.
More than two centuries after his birth, Ralph Waldo Emerson remains one of the presiding spirits in American culture. Yet his reputation as the starry-eyed prophet of self-reliance has obscured a much more complicated figure who spent a lifetime wrestling with injustice, philosophy, art, desire, and suffering. James Marcus introduces readers to this Emerson, a writer of self-interrogating genius whose visionary flights are always grounded in Yankee shrewdness.
This Emerson is a rebel. He is also a lover, a friend, a husband, and a father. Having declared his great topic to be “the infinitude of the private man,” he is nonetheless an intensely social being who develops Transcendentalism in the company of Henry David Thoreau, Margaret Fuller, Bronson Alcott, and Theodore Parker. And although he resists political activism early on—hoping instead for a revolution in consciousness—the burning issue of slavery ultimately transforms him from cloistered metaphysician to fiery abolitionist.
Drawing on telling episodes from Emerson’s life alongside landmark essays like “Self-Reliance,” “Experience,” and “Circles,” Glad to the Brink of Fear reveals how Emerson shares our preoccupations with fate and freedom, race and inequality, love and grief. It shows, too, how his desire to see the world afresh, rather than accepting the consensus view, is a lesson that never grows old.
344 pages, Hardcover
Published March 5, 2024
25 people are currently reading
348 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18 reviews
April 22, 2024
I found the author’s casual, for lack of a better word, tone to be distracting, although I appreciated the humorous and odd bits of information he shared. I also wouldn’t call this pure biography as the writer often inserts himself into the story. Depending on what one expects this can be enjoyable or annoying.
While I have read some of Emerson’s work, I have not been one of his starry eyed followers. If anything, I think his writings on individuality can be dangerous to society if taken too far, and at least here in the U.S., we are suffering the consequences of this kind of thinking.
However, as the author makes clear that in his later life Emerson became a passionate abolitionist which seems to indicate that even he saw the need for working together for society.
The author clearly states he is an admirer of Emerson but he still points out Emerson’s problematic thinking and writing, specifically his habit of taking one side of an argument only to further on write the complete opposite. This to me is enough to not take Emerson seriously but others disagree, obviously.
While I have read some of Emerson’s work, I have not been one of his starry eyed followers. If anything, I think his writings on individuality can be dangerous to society if taken too far, and at least here in the U.S., we are suffering the consequences of this kind of thinking.
However, as the author makes clear that in his later life Emerson became a passionate abolitionist which seems to indicate that even he saw the need for working together for society.
The author clearly states he is an admirer of Emerson but he still points out Emerson’s problematic thinking and writing, specifically his habit of taking one side of an argument only to further on write the complete opposite. This to me is enough to not take Emerson seriously but others disagree, obviously.
April 29, 2024
What this book gets right that many biographies and histories do not is that our relationships to figures of the past—particularly to those who serve as our heroes or mentors—are fully human relationships, fraught with love, frustration, admiration, disappointment, and awe. I’ve read Emerson, and I’ve read biographies of Emerson, and to some extent I already have a relationship with Emerson…nevertheless, James Marcus’s Emerson was wholly new to me, full of things I didn’t know, answering questions that lingered and nagged at me. To say that this is a literary biography is accurate, but it doesn’t really contain the feel of it. Marcus tells the story of carrying Emerson in his mind during pivotal moments of his own life, and of then digging past the outer shell of the person (or the clothing, as Mark Twain would say) to Emerson’s own inner struggles. Marcus sheds the false objectivity of the scholar for the more honest subjective assessment of, well, an actual person, and the result is something closer to an intellectual memoir, a dramatization of how and why figures from the past inform out lives, guide us, challenge us. As it happens, Emerson is the perfect figure to be considering to understand the modern, fraught political moment, which has many parallels to Emerson’s time. This is a perfect book for those who hope to come to know, in the flesh, the greatest of America’s literary founding fathers, and to understand how a challenging past offers instruction for modern lives, both personal and political.
May 27, 2024
It took me a while to get used to the author’s writing style, but after I accepted that, I really enjoyed the book and came to understand Emerson better.
March 21, 2024
The book jacket hyperbole included in the Goodreads posting is a brilliant attempt at trying to make this a book worth reading. I'm not convinced it is, other than for devoted Emerson fans.
I believe Emerson's writings are well overdue for revisiting for the culpability in breeding the now rampant American individuality -- its arrogance and denial of responsibility to the larger community of being under attack from our capitalist, materialist extravagance. At the same time he's talking about the wonder of nature, he's espousing the rights of man to do as he pleases. Much a product of his times in a country overflowing in natural abundance and exploiting humans still small in number. Reading his works in the light of overpopulation, over consumption, climate change and growing age of natural limits, I am growing to think, one sees not the champion many of us might have held in our own naive youth, but instead a person's whose beliefs and vision was not as transcendent as the movement's title warranted. Emerson is as much a product of his times as he is a leader to something better, I fear.
So if you're looking for a book exploring this potentially controversial position, this ain't it. This biography is a good example of the need to separate the works of a genius from his life. This one is, according to the biographer, remarkably dry, despite his efforts to make Emerson otherwise. Marcus goes so far as to muse on whether Thoreau and Emerson were lovers while Thoreau lived in the Emerson home without providing evidence of any reason to do that other than for 21st century titillation.
I'm concluding Marcus's book leaves us thinking of Emerson: I'll stick to Waldo's books, his essays, his writings. There is enough to keep us interested to let this body or work alone -- especially as we know more now, generations later, that we need to revisit the full meaning and impact of Emerson's thinking.
Early review acknowledgement: I thank my public library for allowing me to reserve this book before publication, getting it in my hands as soon as they received it, and allowing me to read and return it so that anyone else may also read it free of charge, regardless of race and economic standing.
I believe Emerson's writings are well overdue for revisiting for the culpability in breeding the now rampant American individuality -- its arrogance and denial of responsibility to the larger community of being under attack from our capitalist, materialist extravagance. At the same time he's talking about the wonder of nature, he's espousing the rights of man to do as he pleases. Much a product of his times in a country overflowing in natural abundance and exploiting humans still small in number. Reading his works in the light of overpopulation, over consumption, climate change and growing age of natural limits, I am growing to think, one sees not the champion many of us might have held in our own naive youth, but instead a person's whose beliefs and vision was not as transcendent as the movement's title warranted. Emerson is as much a product of his times as he is a leader to something better, I fear.
So if you're looking for a book exploring this potentially controversial position, this ain't it. This biography is a good example of the need to separate the works of a genius from his life. This one is, according to the biographer, remarkably dry, despite his efforts to make Emerson otherwise. Marcus goes so far as to muse on whether Thoreau and Emerson were lovers while Thoreau lived in the Emerson home without providing evidence of any reason to do that other than for 21st century titillation.
I'm concluding Marcus's book leaves us thinking of Emerson: I'll stick to Waldo's books, his essays, his writings. There is enough to keep us interested to let this body or work alone -- especially as we know more now, generations later, that we need to revisit the full meaning and impact of Emerson's thinking.
Early review acknowledgement: I thank my public library for allowing me to reserve this book before publication, getting it in my hands as soon as they received it, and allowing me to read and return it so that anyone else may also read it free of charge, regardless of race and economic standing.
July 29, 2025
I have an Emerson problem. I don't get him. I keep reading intelligent writers rave about his wisdom, his keen insights, his beautiful writing and his valuable life advice. I have never been able to finish one of his essays without throwing down the book and saying, "this is bullshit".
Marcus has put together the best case for Emerson in this fascinating study. This is his personal analysis of what Emerson was up to, what he had to say and how his life affected his writing. Marcus outlines, in the first person, his understanding of, and wrestling with, Emerson and his writing.
Emerson's personal life is central to his ideas. His family produced generations of preachers. He tried and he eventually left organized religion because he could not accept the Christian doctrine. He married a sickly 18-year-old woman who died two year later. She left him a large inheritance. Four years after he married his second wife. They had a long and peculiar marriage. He became a writer and lecturer. He was what we would call now, a public intellectual.
Marcus walks us through his most important essays and does an excellent job of explaining what he had to say and how it fit into his intellectual times. For example, Emerson always opposed slavery, but he was initially dubious about the abolitionists. He thought they were fanatics. After the fugitive slave law was passed, he became a vehement and public advocate for abolition.
Despite Marcus' best efforts, it still sounds like bullshit to me. Emerson makes pronouncements that sound wise, but don't make sense. Look at some of the sentences Marcus quotes with admiration.
"To believe that what is true for you in your private heart, is true for all men-that is genius"
No, it isn't. It is egomania.
"Beauty is the moment of transition, as if the form were just ready to flow into other forms."
No that does not describe the beauty in a painting, a symphony or a face.
"All the facts in Nature are nouns of the intellect, and make the grammar of the eternal language"
All the nouns in this sentence could be put in any order and it would make as much sense.
"The axioms of physics translate the law of ethics"
Huh?
Marcus helped me to understand why Emerson annoyed me so much. He explained that Emerson focused on writing single sentences that were striking. He then would gather sentences on a subject like friendship or nature and make an essay of them. As Marcus explains, "He would not travel down the familiar routs ruts of logic, linearity, precedent. Instead, he advances over the steppingstones of his individual sentences and trusts his gut to make them hang together; musically, emotionally, spiritually." In other words, although he left the pulpit, he was still a preacher.
A preacher does not support his sermon with logic, or science or history. A preacher announces the word of God and expects you to accept it as truth. That is exactly what Emerson did.
I hate preachers. I hate politicians who preach, sportscasters who preach, commentators who preach, preachers who preach and that is, at bottom, why I never have had any use for Ralph Waldo Emerson.
This is a very good book about Emerson. Its personal tone works with Emerson. You will come away from it with an understanding of this complicated thinker and a better ability to decide if, like me, you think he is full of it.
Marcus has put together the best case for Emerson in this fascinating study. This is his personal analysis of what Emerson was up to, what he had to say and how his life affected his writing. Marcus outlines, in the first person, his understanding of, and wrestling with, Emerson and his writing.
Emerson's personal life is central to his ideas. His family produced generations of preachers. He tried and he eventually left organized religion because he could not accept the Christian doctrine. He married a sickly 18-year-old woman who died two year later. She left him a large inheritance. Four years after he married his second wife. They had a long and peculiar marriage. He became a writer and lecturer. He was what we would call now, a public intellectual.
Marcus walks us through his most important essays and does an excellent job of explaining what he had to say and how it fit into his intellectual times. For example, Emerson always opposed slavery, but he was initially dubious about the abolitionists. He thought they were fanatics. After the fugitive slave law was passed, he became a vehement and public advocate for abolition.
Despite Marcus' best efforts, it still sounds like bullshit to me. Emerson makes pronouncements that sound wise, but don't make sense. Look at some of the sentences Marcus quotes with admiration.
"To believe that what is true for you in your private heart, is true for all men-that is genius"
No, it isn't. It is egomania.
"Beauty is the moment of transition, as if the form were just ready to flow into other forms."
No that does not describe the beauty in a painting, a symphony or a face.
"All the facts in Nature are nouns of the intellect, and make the grammar of the eternal language"
All the nouns in this sentence could be put in any order and it would make as much sense.
"The axioms of physics translate the law of ethics"
Huh?
Marcus helped me to understand why Emerson annoyed me so much. He explained that Emerson focused on writing single sentences that were striking. He then would gather sentences on a subject like friendship or nature and make an essay of them. As Marcus explains, "He would not travel down the familiar routs ruts of logic, linearity, precedent. Instead, he advances over the steppingstones of his individual sentences and trusts his gut to make them hang together; musically, emotionally, spiritually." In other words, although he left the pulpit, he was still a preacher.
A preacher does not support his sermon with logic, or science or history. A preacher announces the word of God and expects you to accept it as truth. That is exactly what Emerson did.
I hate preachers. I hate politicians who preach, sportscasters who preach, commentators who preach, preachers who preach and that is, at bottom, why I never have had any use for Ralph Waldo Emerson.
This is a very good book about Emerson. Its personal tone works with Emerson. You will come away from it with an understanding of this complicated thinker and a better ability to decide if, like me, you think he is full of it.
August 24, 2024
As someone who has hero-worshipped Emerson my whole life (and named my daughter after him), I was eager to read this biography. But I found the author’s tone and modern view of a historical figure to be distracting and discouraging. I think he did a good job, for the most part, of illustrating Emerson’s flaws within the context of his era. But even as someone who considers myself pretty progressive, I didn’t enjoy what felt like too modern a lens. Marcus’s references to sexuality, for instance, didn’t feel true to Emerson’s own words—they felt twisted to better conform to our society’s norms than to the enlightened-but-still-puritanical nature of 1850. Also, as a Christian who admires Emerson’s spirituality, I didn’t appreciate Marcus’s narrative about Emerson’s own journey. It felt more antagonistic toward organized religion than anything I’ve read before. I know of course the facts—that Emerson did leave the church, that he preferred the individual, free spirituality that he talks about in Nature and his other lectures. But I still view Emerson as a deeply believing person, and it felt like Marcus focused much more on the negative than the positive.
Overall, I appreciated learning more about Emerson’s life, but I’m going to be looking for another biography. Perhaps I’m sticking my head in the sand and wanting to view my hero as more virtuous and admirable than he really is. But I want to compare someone else’s summation of his life to this one and see how it holds up.
Overall, I appreciated learning more about Emerson’s life, but I’m going to be looking for another biography. Perhaps I’m sticking my head in the sand and wanting to view my hero as more virtuous and admirable than he really is. But I want to compare someone else’s summation of his life to this one and see how it holds up.
September 22, 2025
I loved this book, which is indeed a portrait rather than a full biography. It zooms in on the essential movements of Emerson's life: growth, love, exploration, maturation. tragedy (two of them), elder statesmanship, and decline just to name a few. Marcus follows Emerson through his mental stages with biographical nuggets thrown in when impactful on the evolution of this philosopher. I suppose most people would give this a four but it just clicked with me enough to justify the five personally, which I don't give too lightly). If you're Emerson fan, this is a good breeze back into his world. If new to him, this is an accessible primer for his world view. If generally interested in literature and philosophy, Emerson is a must read and this isn't too heavy to disinterest the general reader. It's an easy accessible read and each chapter covers a discrete area of his mental journal. I will gladly read this again one day.
April 9, 2025
A different sort of biography. James Marcus does not follow a chronological recounting of RWE life, instead focusing on themes/ideas across the years. Sometimes it works; sometimes it's confusing.
Interesting insight regarding the essays. Emerson kept a journal which he indexed depending on this topic. EX. If he wrote about friendship or nature or God he'd keep track of where the passage was. In many cases, his essays are simply cut-and-paste. He'd go through the journals and copy his thoughts. Marcus suggests that this is why his essays don't seem to flow well, but are more aphoristic. Emerson also read this way. He was always looking for the great phrase, sentence, paragraph . . . not the great book. Simply did not believe novels, for example, could capture actual truth over X number of pages, though they could capture it in small snippets.
Interesting insight regarding the essays. Emerson kept a journal which he indexed depending on this topic. EX. If he wrote about friendship or nature or God he'd keep track of where the passage was. In many cases, his essays are simply cut-and-paste. He'd go through the journals and copy his thoughts. Marcus suggests that this is why his essays don't seem to flow well, but are more aphoristic. Emerson also read this way. He was always looking for the great phrase, sentence, paragraph . . . not the great book. Simply did not believe novels, for example, could capture actual truth over X number of pages, though they could capture it in small snippets.
February 14, 2025
An unconventional biography of Ralph Waldo Emerson that dips in and out of Emerson's life and works.
Some readers will enjoy the author's style; I wasn't taken with it. James Marcus chooses to call Emerson throughout this book as "Waldo." He injects his own personal life and views into the narrative. He frets that Emerson wasn't anti-racist enough in his early career. He isn't a fan of Emerson's support of private enterprise.
Notwithstanding all this, I did learn some interesting facts about Emerson and his times. And, Emerson's magical way of writing an interesting sentence or paragraph is always worth one's renewed admiration.
Some readers will enjoy the author's style; I wasn't taken with it. James Marcus chooses to call Emerson throughout this book as "Waldo." He injects his own personal life and views into the narrative. He frets that Emerson wasn't anti-racist enough in his early career. He isn't a fan of Emerson's support of private enterprise.
Notwithstanding all this, I did learn some interesting facts about Emerson and his times. And, Emerson's magical way of writing an interesting sentence or paragraph is always worth one's renewed admiration.
June 24, 2025
This is an accessible and rather lovely biography of Emerson, written not so much in an attempt to retell all events of his life (in fact, this book intentionally focuses only on certain specific moments in his life) but instead to show how profoundly Emerson has impacted our culture, our literature, and the author himself.
I enjoyed seeing Emerson through Marcus’ eyes, reading his interpretations of Emerson’s actions, letters, journals, and of course, texts. It’s clear he loves Emerson, and the affection becomes contagious — increasingly with each page.
This is a great foray into Emerson, and also a great way to shake up stodgy assumptions about him. A treat of a book.
I enjoyed seeing Emerson through Marcus’ eyes, reading his interpretations of Emerson’s actions, letters, journals, and of course, texts. It’s clear he loves Emerson, and the affection becomes contagious — increasingly with each page.
This is a great foray into Emerson, and also a great way to shake up stodgy assumptions about him. A treat of a book.
September 3, 2025
My interest in Emerson kept me reading the entire book but it was not a very satisfying experience. I feel as if I learned more than I want or need to know about Marcus and less than I had hoped to learn about Emerson. The technique used to look at Emerson through the topics of his thought rather than a more chronological biography was an interesting approach that I hope I can find other biographers might have taken. I am still curious enough about Emerson to seek other sources but will avoid Marcus in the future on any topic.
August 8, 2024
beautiful piece, but as someone who perused his biography, noting his affinity for "eastern" works, I wish the author wrestled a little more with his contradictory feelings towards people from which he borrowed his philosophies---i.e. Indian and Chinese writers; I might have sped through it but not much attention was given (if at all) to his international inspirations, minus the European texts. still, a good biography; touching last few chapters.
July 3, 2024
I realized I should have started with a more linear biography as my first one on this American icon. That is more the reason for the three star rating. This biography was well written and very interesting. I was engaged the whole book which is rare for me. For someone who has a more "ready" working knowledge of Emerson's life this would be a five star biography.
September 9, 2024
3.75
I'm an Emerson fanboy so even though I know much of this material, I still enjoyed his take on his life and work and also managed to learn tons I didn't know (Mainly, about his family, illnesses and race). It also compelled me to purchase two volumes of Emerson's journals after having read the excerpts Marcus included within his narrative.
I'm an Emerson fanboy so even though I know much of this material, I still enjoyed his take on his life and work and also managed to learn tons I didn't know (Mainly, about his family, illnesses and race). It also compelled me to purchase two volumes of Emerson's journals after having read the excerpts Marcus included within his narrative.
Read
April 9, 2024Audiobook. DNF
November 15, 2025
A solid biography but the author doesn't have that many insights into his philosophy or intellectual originality. Still, I liked the book and it has inspired me to read a Fuller biography soon.
November 27, 2025
Not the first book I’ve read about Emerson but it is the first one I’ve read that made me feel like I understood him.
December 10, 2025
Excellent and very readable biography of a giant in American intellectual life.
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18 reviews