[9/10]
La pregunda de sus ojos - I like the sound of the Spanish title, the melodic twang that tempts me to put on an album by Astor Piazzolla in the background. I knew what to expect, after watching (and loving) the movie version that won an Oscar for Best Foreign Film. Actually, I wish I had discovered the book before seeing the movie, because some of the urgency and some of the surprising revelations are lost in a second reading. I understand Eduardo Sacherri actually worked on the script, so it shouldn't be a surprise that it was such a good adaptation. Still, I believe some aspects were better handled in the movie, especially those involving Irene.
For those who are unfamiliar with the story, the book is a police procedural, a political thriller, an existential introspective journey, a moving love story that transcends death, another romantic entanglement that somehow cannot make the translation from eyes to words. The police procedural referes to the investigation, led by a functionary in the Justice Department - Benjamin Chaparro, into the gruesome murder of Liliana Colotto, a young housewife in a typical Buenos Aires suburb. The political thriller refers to the impact of the military dictature on the life of ordinary citizens, and on the distortion of justice when it is put in the service of state terrorism. The existential angle comes from Chaparro looking back at his life after his retirement from the administrative post and examining his obsession with the Colotto case and his relationship with his two former wifes, with his colleagues and enemies (bureaucrats, arrivists, activistss). The love that continues after death is the story of the young widower, Ricardo Morales, who is a 'dead man' and twenty-six, and can't give up on the idea of justice for his murdered wife. The romance without words is the passion of Chaparro for his colleague and later boss in the Justice department, Irene Hornos. The different threads are in fact inseparrable, and each one determines the other in a chain of causality that I found both chilling and convincing in their casualness - 'it could happen to anyone, anywhere' where people consider themselves above the law. Here's how Morales explains it:
Do you want me to tell you the truth? I simply applied the existential principle that governs my life. It's my maxim: Everything that can go bad is going to go bad. And its corollary: everything that seems to be going well will turn, sooner or later, to shit. .
Among many highlights in the novel, I couldn't let pass the friendship between Benjamin and Sandoval, his brilliant, but booze addled colleague ( sometimes we men feel more secure if we treat those we love a little coldly ) , who sometimes feels like he carries all the pain of the world on his shoulders.
Specific to the book are the confessional chapters of Benjamin working on the book, questioning his memory, his motives and his capability of accurately putting thought on paper. This inclusion of the author into the story adds a layer of authenticity, of personal involvement, of actual people and situations being recounted. In the afterword, I found a mention of actual events that inspired the story : the release of criminals from a state prison that later found their way into hit squads 'dissapearing' people who made the powerful uncomfortable.
I guess when there are things you can't say, the words have to come out through your eyes" is the key to both the title and the investigation. The long years put into the research for the case, the scarcity of direct physical evidence, the introverted investigator, the careful characterizations, the general downbeat tone of the narrative and the political musings - all these elements make me draw parallels to the Nordic crime novels, especially the ones featuring Inspector Martin Beck from the Maj Sjowall & Per Wahloo series and more recently, the Kurt Wallander books.
Highly recommended.