What do you think?
Rate this book
David Brunelle Legal Thriller #1
Presumption of Innocence
Homicide prosecutor David Brunelle faces the most difficult case of his career. An innocent young girl is murdered in a heinous, unforgivable way. The only evidence against the killer is the full confession of his accomplice--another young girl he also victimized. But the accomplice is charged with the murder as well, which means she has the right to remain silent. And she's so scared of the killer, she refuses to take a deal to testify against him. Brunelle can't just let the murderer walk, but how can he get a conviction when he has no admissible evidence and the killer is protected by the PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE?
236 pages, Kindle Edition
First published July 1, 2012
2481 people are currently reading
1112 people want to read
About the author
Stephen Penner
62 books156 followersStephen Penner is an author, artist, and attorney from Seattle, Washington. He has written more than 30 novels and specializes in courtroom thrillers known for their unexpected twists and candid portrayal of the justice system. He draws on his extensive experience as a criminal trial attorney to infuse his writing with realism and insight.
Stephen is the author of several top-rated legal thriller series. The DAVID BRUNELLE LEGAL THRILLERS feature Seattle homicide D.A. David Brunelle and a recurring cast of cops, defense attorneys, and forensic experts. The TALON WINTER LEGAL THRILLERS showcase tough-as-nails Tacoma criminal defense attorney Talon Winter and her closest allies. And the RAIN CITY LEGAL THRILLERS deliver the adventures of attorney Daniel Raine and his unlikely partner Rebecca Sommers. Stephen is also the author of the MAGGIE DEVEREAUX PARANORMAL MYSTERIES, recounting the exploits of an American graduate student in the magical Highlands of Scotland, and several other stand-alone works.
In his spare time, Stephen enjoys painting, drawing, and spending time with his family. For more information, visit his website www.stephenpenner.com.
Stephen is the author of several top-rated legal thriller series. The DAVID BRUNELLE LEGAL THRILLERS feature Seattle homicide D.A. David Brunelle and a recurring cast of cops, defense attorneys, and forensic experts. The TALON WINTER LEGAL THRILLERS showcase tough-as-nails Tacoma criminal defense attorney Talon Winter and her closest allies. And the RAIN CITY LEGAL THRILLERS deliver the adventures of attorney Daniel Raine and his unlikely partner Rebecca Sommers. Stephen is also the author of the MAGGIE DEVEREAUX PARANORMAL MYSTERIES, recounting the exploits of an American graduate student in the magical Highlands of Scotland, and several other stand-alone works.
In his spare time, Stephen enjoys painting, drawing, and spending time with his family. For more information, visit his website www.stephenpenner.com.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 153 reviews
September 6, 2013
The elements I look for in a legal thriller/novel are competent descriptions of courtroom scenes, an unusual legal tactic/strategy/issue, a moral conundrum, and believable, if not likeable, characters. This book has several of the aforementioned and kept the pages turning as ADA David Brunelle tries to salvage a difficult case.
A young girl is found hanging upside-down from the banister in her home. She has been bled-out, her blood collected for, well you'll find out. The culprits are quickly identified and the novel then focuses on the legal shenanigans needed to try to convict the killer. I liked the legal wrangling. The romance between Brunelle and the ME was forced and one of his actions was legally and ethically reprehensible.
The book could have been stronger on the moral issues. The death penalty was used on a couple of occasions as an element of humor rather than as a quandary for the characters.
Nevertheless, I like the book, a good quick read, perfect for a distraction.
3.3534128 stars rounded to 3
A young girl is found hanging upside-down from the banister in her home. She has been bled-out, her blood collected for, well you'll find out. The culprits are quickly identified and the novel then focuses on the legal shenanigans needed to try to convict the killer. I liked the legal wrangling. The romance between Brunelle and the ME was forced and one of his actions was legally and ethically reprehensible.
The book could have been stronger on the moral issues. The death penalty was used on a couple of occasions as an element of humor rather than as a quandary for the characters.
Nevertheless, I like the book, a good quick read, perfect for a distraction.
3.3534128 stars rounded to 3
November 30, 2013
I guess I have been spoiled by John Grisham.
I just finished Grisham's newest, Sycamore Row. I enjoyed it as much as I did his earliest books that I like best. I wanted another in the same style, but I've read all Grisham's courtoom dramas. So I went looking for other books similar in style. But I have to say, this is not John Grisham..
My first complaint: typos. The Kindle edition of this book had, I'd estimate, about ten to a dozen typos. "Gentleman" instead of "gentlemen", omitted words, that kind of thing. Drove me crazy. Worst of all, at one point it called the victim of the murder by the wrong name, Elizabeth instead of Emily. There was no Elizabeth in the book. Sloppy.
Second, some plot elements and dialogue were implausible. This character wouldn't throw out that smart remark immediately after an event that nearly resulted in the murder of her own child. That character wouldn't be stupid enough to say what he just said in the courtroom, or do what he just did. It just didn't ring true.
Third, Penner completely skipped over the gathering of evidence and the investigation of the murder. He jumped straight to the courtroom. There were questions I had that were never answered.
Fourth, too many f-bombs and other foul language thrown in. Because of my job, I spend the vast majority of my reading time on books written for kids. I prefer it that way. Authors for kids, in general, have realized that it's quite possible to write entertaining fiction with interesting, well-developed characters and situations without including coarse language. This guy, not so much. Oh, it wasn't rampant on every page, but even a few times is a few times too many for me.
Maybe his work improved after this, his first David Brunelle story, but I won't be reading Penner again. I'll stick with John Grisham. He isn't perfect, but he's still the best in my book.
I just finished Grisham's newest, Sycamore Row. I enjoyed it as much as I did his earliest books that I like best. I wanted another in the same style, but I've read all Grisham's courtoom dramas. So I went looking for other books similar in style. But I have to say, this is not John Grisham..
My first complaint: typos. The Kindle edition of this book had, I'd estimate, about ten to a dozen typos. "Gentleman" instead of "gentlemen", omitted words, that kind of thing. Drove me crazy. Worst of all, at one point it called the victim of the murder by the wrong name, Elizabeth instead of Emily. There was no Elizabeth in the book. Sloppy.
Second, some plot elements and dialogue were implausible. This character wouldn't throw out that smart remark immediately after an event that nearly resulted in the murder of her own child. That character wouldn't be stupid enough to say what he just said in the courtroom, or do what he just did. It just didn't ring true.
Third, Penner completely skipped over the gathering of evidence and the investigation of the murder. He jumped straight to the courtroom. There were questions I had that were never answered.
Fourth, too many f-bombs and other foul language thrown in. Because of my job, I spend the vast majority of my reading time on books written for kids. I prefer it that way. Authors for kids, in general, have realized that it's quite possible to write entertaining fiction with interesting, well-developed characters and situations without including coarse language. This guy, not so much. Oh, it wasn't rampant on every page, but even a few times is a few times too many for me.
Maybe his work improved after this, his first David Brunelle story, but I won't be reading Penner again. I'll stick with John Grisham. He isn't perfect, but he's still the best in my book.
February 20, 2014
I REALLY enjoyed this and but for the really slapdash mistakes throughout it would easily merit 5 stars. What a bloody shame. It's a really good story with some terrific characters, especially Dave himself and Faust, a girl who tends bar he interviews.
This has to be the best first page of a book I've read in an age as well.There were also some very amusing lines in it.
But, my word, the mistakes just kept on coming. More than anything it was dropped speechmarks or words just missed from sentences like the/to/he/at, etc...throughout the whole book. There were also the old free download staple of missing or misplaced apostrophes, too.
Then the was used and it should've been to, intact doesn't need a space, jamb isn't spelt jam. Then on one page Emily was 13 yet on the next 14. That was pretty unforgivable and it beggars belief nobody ever spotted it ! Illicit was used where it should be elicit as well.
So if not for the sloppy editing this was easily a 5 star read. Here's hoping the second instalment underwent a better proofreading exercise.
This has to be the best first page of a book I've read in an age as well.There were also some very amusing lines in it.
But, my word, the mistakes just kept on coming. More than anything it was dropped speechmarks or words just missed from sentences like the/to/he/at, etc...throughout the whole book. There were also the old free download staple of missing or misplaced apostrophes, too.
Then the was used and it should've been to, intact doesn't need a space, jamb isn't spelt jam. Then on one page Emily was 13 yet on the next 14. That was pretty unforgivable and it beggars belief nobody ever spotted it ! Illicit was used where it should be elicit as well.
So if not for the sloppy editing this was easily a 5 star read. Here's hoping the second instalment underwent a better proofreading exercise.
June 28, 2024
Just ok- maybe it needed to be a little longer and in depth. I just didn’t feel like I read a full novel.
August 14, 2013
this book was better than I expected... when I first started reading it I thought it would be boring, you know the killer right away, but it actually moved along well... there really wasn't too much suspense and it wasn't much of a thriller, but it was an easy read & the characters were likable, funny & smart... the kindle edition was only $1.99 so not a bad read for that price... will try others by this author
February 16, 2013
good read but the ending left a lot to be desired.
January 31, 2016
Interesting
It's basically an entertaining series. Sometimes it is VERY predictable with not many plot twists. Could be more hardboiled but overall it flows decently. So far finished books 1 and 2 so guess there is something bringing me back. Liked the bartender Faust in book 1, Kat is more like Scarlett O'Hara with a M.D.
It's basically an entertaining series. Sometimes it is VERY predictable with not many plot twists. Could be more hardboiled but overall it flows decently. So far finished books 1 and 2 so guess there is something bringing me back. Liked the bartender Faust in book 1, Kat is more like Scarlett O'Hara with a M.D.
November 30, 2016
Good first in series
Although a bit too much legal jargon for my taste, the characters were interesting and diverse, I felt it was a bit rushed in parts, and I would have liked more depth to some people, Mr and Mrs Montgomery for example. Having said that, I'm going to download the s e tries, as I really liked David Brunelle
Although a bit too much legal jargon for my taste, the characters were interesting and diverse, I felt it was a bit rushed in parts, and I would have liked more depth to some people, Mr and Mrs Montgomery for example. Having said that, I'm going to download the s e tries, as I really liked David Brunelle
April 21, 2020
DNF.
what? Slam dunk case! oh yeah? what's the evidence? Little druggie girl told me he was there. wouldn't a "bit" more investigating, interviewing, evidence finding maybe be a good idea? F' no! start the prosecution!! gonna stick the needle in him myself oh wait there's another hot piece of ass maybe I'll let her do it.
what? Slam dunk case! oh yeah? what's the evidence? Little druggie girl told me he was there. wouldn't a "bit" more investigating, interviewing, evidence finding maybe be a good idea? F' no! start the prosecution!! gonna stick the needle in him myself oh wait there's another hot piece of ass maybe I'll let her do it.
August 8, 2012
This was a great book, the dialogue and tension set the stage for a good courtroom thriller.
January 29, 2019
Ok
Odd writing style. Needed more something continuously. Kept reading anyway. Author has unique observations on criminal justice attorneys view of atrocities.
Odd writing style. Needed more something continuously. Kept reading anyway. Author has unique observations on criminal justice attorneys view of atrocities.
August 17, 2020
Thrilling
This well written, fast paced murder mystery is exciting with many legal twists. It is suspenseful and flows easilybetween scenes and court.
This well written, fast paced murder mystery is exciting with many legal twists. It is suspenseful and flows easilybetween scenes and court.
May 28, 2022
Solid and engaging, but plenty of hiccups.
After taking a bit of a break from legal thrillers, I sorta missed the genre and so decided to take another dive to see what I'd dig up. Enter Presumption of Innocence. It didn't take long for this book to grab my attention in most of the best ways for my attention to be grabbed, which is a major plus. I had high hopes for it, and for the most part was satisfied, at least enough to want to keep going.
The premise was interesting and tragic, as it involves a poor young girl being murdered, but the only witness was also an accomplice of sorts, an accomplice who has opted not to talk. Stressed me out, all the legalities of this case (I swear, I could never be a lawyer). But it was all very intriguing and informative, as books written by lawyers usually are. The story was told in a quick pace and was easy to follow with chapters picking up where the previous ones left off. No draggy moments at all. It had likable characters, dialogues, and interactions. I became fond of the main star David Brunelle rather quickly, which is important, because I can turn away from finishing a series in a heartbeat if I can't stand the main stars. It's happened before and it will no doubt happen again. So far so good for Dave Brunelle, though it's only the first book. Dialogue was superb and dominated the book, but that sadly kinda backfired later on and ultimately contributed to my complaints.
Because yeah, I've got complaints. So much of this story focuses on the case or talking about the case, (with all the aforementioned dialogue), that many potential opportunities to develop character's lives and/or backstories are squandered. This becomes very evident when the author opts to state the passing of days between legal matters. There's not much detail on life outside of the case, save for a couple of dates between Kat and Dave. Do the characters not have personal lives for me to get a look at? Why isn't there something that can really make them POP and thus entice me to REALLY get to know them? This is important stuff that can really help shape the character's I'm reading about. I would have loved the passing of days spend a bit more time with Dave outside of the case. Lack of embellishment in so many areas got to me after a while. Important plot points are either handled in the background or not at all.
Too many unanswered questions. Too many conveniences for the plot's sake. Why in the HECK did Kat and Dave discuss Lizzy in the presence of Karpati? Really? How'd Dave know of the Doctor's history? Likely his co-counsel informed him, but yeah. Behind the scenes, it seems. It wasn't mentioned. Who bailed out Karpati? Who even had the money to do so? How'd Karpati know where Kat lived? And don't even get me started on the abrupt (and awkward) ending. On second thought, no, lemme go on and mention that ending. Lizzy has a frickin' knife to her throat but once she's saved, the only audible responses are "God, you lawyers talk too much" from her mother and "I won't be giving that closing argument on Monday after all" from Dave? Like seriously? And then the matter isn't even discussed. Kat still goes out with Dave, no fuss no muss, and then the poof, the end? It all felt very incomplete, unsatisfyingly so.
Despite the loss of the 4th star that I was leaning on, I still enjoyed myself quite a bit. I still liked the pace and flow and the overall story. I was entertained even amidst my complaints, enough so that I definitely want to keep going. And who knows, maybe the things I complained about will be resolved in future entries, particularly the development of characters and their personal lives. Fingers crossed as I go further into the adventures of David Brunelle.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
January 5, 2026
Presumption of Innocence is the first foray into the David Brunelle Legal Thriller Series. In this series, the main character is a prosecutor—David Brunelle.
This story begins with the discovery of a murdered fifteen-year-old girl, found hanging upside down from the second story bannister inside her home. There is a small slit across her carotid artery, and her corpse is mostly drained of blood. Further, there is no blood on the scene—not even a drop—which mean the murderer(s) took the blood with them.
There was also a note taped to the outside of the front door, telling the victim’s parents to not go inside but call 911. So, the parents immediately went inside and found their daughter’s body. However, there was enough evidence on the note to identify the author: a fifteen-year-old friend of their daughter. That teenager told the police about a twenty-year-old male who she helped gain entry to the house, but also said she was throwing up in he toilet while the man drained the blood from the victim—so he could drink it later. Enter David Brunelle, prosecutor.
One thing that stood out to me in this book was the pacing. It was consistent, right on point, and took a logical path to the climax. That’s not to say, however, that there weren’t some switch blocks and roadblocks, because there were. Author Penner also did a splendid job of showing rather than telling.
The story only had a handful of significant characters, which I consider a good thing. I never had to dig back in previous chapters to understand who a specific character was. The description—mostly of the characters—was adequate to form mental images in my mind.
I considered the storyline quite original and the conflict adequate to keep me turning pages. After I finished reading this story, I immediately downloaded the second book in the series.
Overall, I found this book both satisfying and exciting!
This story begins with the discovery of a murdered fifteen-year-old girl, found hanging upside down from the second story bannister inside her home. There is a small slit across her carotid artery, and her corpse is mostly drained of blood. Further, there is no blood on the scene—not even a drop—which mean the murderer(s) took the blood with them.
There was also a note taped to the outside of the front door, telling the victim’s parents to not go inside but call 911. So, the parents immediately went inside and found their daughter’s body. However, there was enough evidence on the note to identify the author: a fifteen-year-old friend of their daughter. That teenager told the police about a twenty-year-old male who she helped gain entry to the house, but also said she was throwing up in he toilet while the man drained the blood from the victim—so he could drink it later. Enter David Brunelle, prosecutor.
One thing that stood out to me in this book was the pacing. It was consistent, right on point, and took a logical path to the climax. That’s not to say, however, that there weren’t some switch blocks and roadblocks, because there were. Author Penner also did a splendid job of showing rather than telling.
The story only had a handful of significant characters, which I consider a good thing. I never had to dig back in previous chapters to understand who a specific character was. The description—mostly of the characters—was adequate to form mental images in my mind.
I considered the storyline quite original and the conflict adequate to keep me turning pages. After I finished reading this story, I immediately downloaded the second book in the series.
Overall, I found this book both satisfying and exciting!
November 2, 2025
3.5 Stars
Presumption of Innocence is the first instalment in the David Brunelle Legal Thriller Series. And so the book binge began ... this series turned out to be a gripping and masterfully crafted collection of legal dramas set against the backdrop of Seattle’s criminal justice system. The series follows David Brunelle, a dedicated and sharp prosecutor, as he navigates the complexities of law, morality, and justice.
What makes this series stand out is the balance between intense courtroom drama with deeply human stories. David Brunelle is an intriguing character - intelligent, principled, and yet flawed in ways that make him even more relatable. Mr. Penner’s writing easily brings the legal world to life with authenticity, offering a fascinating glimpse into the challenges prosecutors face, from gathering evidence to battling wily defense attorneys.
Each book in the series presents a unique and thought-provoking case, often delving into some morally ambiguous territory. The plots are tightly woven, with twists that are both surprising and satisfying. Mr. Penner’s ability to build the tension and suspense is noteworthy, as is his knack for creating vivid, multidimensional characters – both the heroes and villains.
So, whether you’re a fan of legal thrillers, crime fiction, or simply enjoy a well-told story, then the David Brunelle series delivers on all fronts.
Happy Reading…
Presumption of Innocence is the first instalment in the David Brunelle Legal Thriller Series. And so the book binge began ... this series turned out to be a gripping and masterfully crafted collection of legal dramas set against the backdrop of Seattle’s criminal justice system. The series follows David Brunelle, a dedicated and sharp prosecutor, as he navigates the complexities of law, morality, and justice.
What makes this series stand out is the balance between intense courtroom drama with deeply human stories. David Brunelle is an intriguing character - intelligent, principled, and yet flawed in ways that make him even more relatable. Mr. Penner’s writing easily brings the legal world to life with authenticity, offering a fascinating glimpse into the challenges prosecutors face, from gathering evidence to battling wily defense attorneys.
Each book in the series presents a unique and thought-provoking case, often delving into some morally ambiguous territory. The plots are tightly woven, with twists that are both surprising and satisfying. Mr. Penner’s ability to build the tension and suspense is noteworthy, as is his knack for creating vivid, multidimensional characters – both the heroes and villains.
So, whether you’re a fan of legal thrillers, crime fiction, or simply enjoy a well-told story, then the David Brunelle series delivers on all fronts.
Happy Reading…
December 4, 2020
I liked it enough to read more in the series, but if they don't improve I doubt I'll stick to it very long. There are too many plot points that border heavily on wishful thinking. For example, no high-priced defense attorney would ever make the kind of stupid mistakes the guy in the book made. He wouldn't be worth that kind of money if he wasn't considerably smarter than that and capable of thinking on his feet. Also, it's not believable that a 30-year veteran of the police force would make the kind of stupid mistakes interrogating suspects that the lead detective makes. Seriously, just put a less experienced detective into the room if you're going to play it stupid like that. The whole thing is farcical, including the idea that even a desperate Assistant D.A. would allow his girlfriend's 13-year-old daughter to assist in an investigation. Really?!
That said, the writing was entertaining and the plot was otherwise well done. I wouldn't mind getting to know some of the characters a little better. My one complaint about the character development is the author hasn't given them very distinct personalities. It's like he modeled all of them on the same person and just tweaked a few details here and there.
That said, the writing was entertaining and the plot was otherwise well done. I wouldn't mind getting to know some of the characters a little better. My one complaint about the character development is the author hasn't given them very distinct personalities. It's like he modeled all of them on the same person and just tweaked a few details here and there.
February 26, 2025
Good and bad here, but mostly good. I've been reading a lot of these "legal thrillers" lately and this might be one of the more legally detailed ones. In other words, a lot of legal "tricks" and stuff, instead of just BS'ing pulling in a last minute witness (which they may or may not do, but I digress).
The author did something odd here that I'm going to have to Google. I don't think I'd heard of it before. They had opening statements, then the prosecutor's case, then the defense's case. All normal so far. But then, where they'd usually go to Closing statements, they had another of what the author called "Opening statement" and then had another witness or two. Almost like rebuttal statements. And THEN after those later witnesses, they both did their closing statements. Could be legit, but just something I want to look up after. (and likely won't)
The main reason I dropped a star from this is simply because the main guy, David Brunelle, is pretty much a pig. Always looking at girls' boobs, always flirting, can't just talk about a girl without "trying to look at her legs". Now, most of the girls are pervs too, so this is borderline "legal smutty thriller", but I digress. Dudes should be nicer.
The author did something odd here that I'm going to have to Google. I don't think I'd heard of it before. They had opening statements, then the prosecutor's case, then the defense's case. All normal so far. But then, where they'd usually go to Closing statements, they had another of what the author called "Opening statement" and then had another witness or two. Almost like rebuttal statements. And THEN after those later witnesses, they both did their closing statements. Could be legit, but just something I want to look up after. (and likely won't)
The main reason I dropped a star from this is simply because the main guy, David Brunelle, is pretty much a pig. Always looking at girls' boobs, always flirting, can't just talk about a girl without "trying to look at her legs". Now, most of the girls are pervs too, so this is borderline "legal smutty thriller", but I digress. Dudes should be nicer.
September 16, 2025
I love courtroom thrillers- Grisham, Turow, Martini, Connelly, but this was a mess. Fun characters, and an interesting plot. Reads as though the author only knows of criminal court through tv and movies.The ethical dilemmas and problems of proof were glossed over and dealt with in a fashion that would immediately get the prosecutor fired and likely disbarred every time.
It’s probably a terrific story for someone with no legal or law enforcement training, but as a career big-city prosecutor, I cringed at every Brunelle brainstorm. Nobody who’s tried more than 3 cases would do- or be allowed to do- or even consider doing—what this guy does on a high- profile murder case. Nobody would have the confidential trial-partner-strategy conversations (including naming the under-age CI!) that this guy does- within earshot of the defendant and his attorney in open court! Dialogue was way too glib and “clever” to be believable.
Finally, the deux ex machina end to the trial was silly. The prosecution can’t surprise the defense with last minute witnesses- without the defense having a thorough opportunity to interview the witness and read the report regarding their testimony. Nonsense. Surpassed only by the ridiculous scene immediately following the close of the defense case. Disappointing book.
It’s probably a terrific story for someone with no legal or law enforcement training, but as a career big-city prosecutor, I cringed at every Brunelle brainstorm. Nobody who’s tried more than 3 cases would do- or be allowed to do- or even consider doing—what this guy does on a high- profile murder case. Nobody would have the confidential trial-partner-strategy conversations (including naming the under-age CI!) that this guy does- within earshot of the defendant and his attorney in open court! Dialogue was way too glib and “clever” to be believable.
Finally, the deux ex machina end to the trial was silly. The prosecution can’t surprise the defense with last minute witnesses- without the defense having a thorough opportunity to interview the witness and read the report regarding their testimony. Nonsense. Surpassed only by the ridiculous scene immediately following the close of the defense case. Disappointing book.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
October 30, 2025
I really enjoy reading legal thrillers so decided to try the David Brunelle series by Stephen Penner. Presumption of Innocence, is the first book in the series and was a good introduction to the lead character David Brunelle. Lots of courtroom drama which suits me fine and an emotionally charged legal thriller. Homicide prosecutor David Brunelle faces a worst case scenario, an innocent young girl has been brutally murdered, and the only person who can help convict the killer is his terrified accomplice, herself charged in the same crime.
The killer’s confession is locked behind the accomplice’s right to remain silent, leaving Brunelle with no admissible evidence and no clear path to conviction. Stephen Penner, is himself a former prosecutor, and he draws on all his experience and knowledge to write realistic courtroom drama. David Brunelle struggles with ethical dilemmas, in this near impossible case.
This is a fast paced quick read with emotionally charged courtroom drama, with the stakes are extreme. Once I got into the character David Brunelle, I knew I was going to enjoy this series and ordered the next two books in the series.
Presumption of Innocence is a good courtroom drama and a solid start to the David Brunelle series.
The killer’s confession is locked behind the accomplice’s right to remain silent, leaving Brunelle with no admissible evidence and no clear path to conviction. Stephen Penner, is himself a former prosecutor, and he draws on all his experience and knowledge to write realistic courtroom drama. David Brunelle struggles with ethical dilemmas, in this near impossible case.
This is a fast paced quick read with emotionally charged courtroom drama, with the stakes are extreme. Once I got into the character David Brunelle, I knew I was going to enjoy this series and ordered the next two books in the series.
Presumption of Innocence is a good courtroom drama and a solid start to the David Brunelle series.
April 17, 2023
David Brunelle Legal Series:
Presumption of Innocence, #1 - While this book did not start out well, the story did get better. Chen is a terrible character, he did not improve from First Offense. The most of the other characters are interesting with good personalities. There is humor, flirtations and romance. There is too much vulgar language but the violence and sex are not graphic. Good courtroom drama, believable. 4*
First Offense - I find both lawyers a bit hard to swallow. She's peeved at the murder charge and he thinks the absence of a suicide note and the location of the bullet's location is murder. His dialog is more immature, childish than a professional. A waste of time. 2*
David Brunelle Legal Series end.
Burden of Proof - The best book so far written by the author. The two main characters are a perfect mix of partnership and friendship. Their dialog, their ability to work together and communicate make this a hard book to put down. Facing odds, the unlikely duo set out to prove a client's innocence while defending her in court. There's a misdirect that may or may not be the killer. Interesting story lines. Entertaining with humor and good drama. 4*
Presumption of Innocence, #1 - While this book did not start out well, the story did get better. Chen is a terrible character, he did not improve from First Offense. The most of the other characters are interesting with good personalities. There is humor, flirtations and romance. There is too much vulgar language but the violence and sex are not graphic. Good courtroom drama, believable. 4*
First Offense - I find both lawyers a bit hard to swallow. She's peeved at the murder charge and he thinks the absence of a suicide note and the location of the bullet's location is murder. His dialog is more immature, childish than a professional. A waste of time. 2*
David Brunelle Legal Series end.
Burden of Proof - The best book so far written by the author. The two main characters are a perfect mix of partnership and friendship. Their dialog, their ability to work together and communicate make this a hard book to put down. Facing odds, the unlikely duo set out to prove a client's innocence while defending her in court. There's a misdirect that may or may not be the killer. Interesting story lines. Entertaining with humor and good drama. 4*
April 15, 2019
First time reading a book by Stephen Penner, it was a very entertaining book to read. The hero ( Prosecuting Attorney) David Brunelle is a flawed and complicated man , a man who sometimes goes over the line to get a conviction. The supporting cast was very interesting, ( over bearing Political Boss, close friend ( Lead Homicide Officer) and a very attractive Medical examiner whom David is attracted to , who has a 13 year old daughter that looks at David as a Father Figure. The other interesting side kick was the very Beautiful and very intelligent, Attractive Assistant DA, these supporting characters are interesting enough to have the storyline based on them. The author manages to make you feel like you are in the courtroom, with Brunelle. The story was very graphic and horrific, the author was able to bring justice to for the victim even though it cost Brunelle a chance at a relationship with one of the supporting cast members .
January 19, 2025
Narrator did such a brilliant job. Author’s writing is engaging and suspenseful. There are twists and shocking revelations. The investigation and court proceedings are spot on. This is the best legal thriller. If you like courtroom proceedings and shocking revelations, this book is for you. The book has plenty of twists. The plot was so unpredictable.
A young girl was murdered and there is only one evidence against the k!ller. The Killer is a sick and twisted minded person who believes that he is a supernatural being and he victimise young girls. While Homicide Prosecutor wants nothing more than justice but with one evidence, he can’t win the case so as further as he digs in the case, he finds out the unbelievable truth and shocking secrets. The twists were unpredictable and this is truly a mind bending book
A young girl was murdered and there is only one evidence against the k!ller. The Killer is a sick and twisted minded person who believes that he is a supernatural being and he victimise young girls. While Homicide Prosecutor wants nothing more than justice but with one evidence, he can’t win the case so as further as he digs in the case, he finds out the unbelievable truth and shocking secrets. The twists were unpredictable and this is truly a mind bending book
April 18, 2020
Brunelle Book 1 of 11
I’m late to the party as I’ve just now started reading this series. I tend to read books offered for free from various sites and this one came up recently.
I enjoyed the read although some of the prosecutor’s antics were hard to believe. After reading the author’s bio though it seems he’s probably seen a lot of courtroom antics.
I thought Brunelle was sleazy in a sexy sort of way. I liked him but his morales were not what I would have thought a prosecutor would be. Silly me. I’m interested in reading more of the series, perhaps not all of the books. I’m hoping that they are all stand-alone type reads.
I recommend this book especially if you like legal thrillers with some R rated activity. The ending was awesome as justice was served.
I’m late to the party as I’ve just now started reading this series. I tend to read books offered for free from various sites and this one came up recently.
I enjoyed the read although some of the prosecutor’s antics were hard to believe. After reading the author’s bio though it seems he’s probably seen a lot of courtroom antics.
I thought Brunelle was sleazy in a sexy sort of way. I liked him but his morales were not what I would have thought a prosecutor would be. Silly me. I’m interested in reading more of the series, perhaps not all of the books. I’m hoping that they are all stand-alone type reads.
I recommend this book especially if you like legal thrillers with some R rated activity. The ending was awesome as justice was served.
September 27, 2020
Bragging has consequences
A gruesome killing, A teen confessing to the crime and incriminated a psychopath convinced he's a vampire. No doubt he'll kill again if left go free for lack of evidence or if he's declared not guilty for reason of insanity he'll be free as soon as doctor's are convinced he has recovered. What to do to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Nothing seems to be working until a girl confessed she has something to say about it. Would she be allowed to testify and would she be a credible witness? This thriller grabs the reader's interest until the blast page. Well done!
A gruesome killing, A teen confessing to the crime and incriminated a psychopath convinced he's a vampire. No doubt he'll kill again if left go free for lack of evidence or if he's declared not guilty for reason of insanity he'll be free as soon as doctor's are convinced he has recovered. What to do to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Nothing seems to be working until a girl confessed she has something to say about it. Would she be allowed to testify and would she be a credible witness? This thriller grabs the reader's interest until the blast page. Well done!
February 7, 2021
"Presumption of Innocence" (2012, 2016) by Stephen Penner is a terse legal drama about Seattle prosecutor David Brunelle’s attempt to convict a young man of murdering a fifteen-year-old girl. The man’s accomplice is also a teenage girl who won’t testify against her boyfriend. The story moves along well. There’s a totally unbelievable plotline that involves a sexual encounter between the main character and a beautiful potential witness nearly half his age that made me roll my eyes. Still, recommended. Paul Costanzo’s narration held my interest.
May 30, 2019
I just completed the story and enjoyed the action a great deal.
It was interesting to see how David was able to overcome all of the issues that the opposing counsel placed in his way. His interaction with the number two counsel was done well and the extremes that David went to get the information that he neede working with Faust and Kat were quite unbelievable.
The ending was not the that I expected so people really need to read this story.
It was interesting to see how David was able to overcome all of the issues that the opposing counsel placed in his way. His interaction with the number two counsel was done well and the extremes that David went to get the information that he neede working with Faust and Kat were quite unbelievable.
The ending was not the that I expected so people really need to read this story.
June 23, 2020
Really enjoyed this book. Court procedure concerning the horrible death of a teenager. David, the prosecutor has his hands full with this trial. All the characters are interesting. Well written, it's as if you are sitting in the courtroom too. There are several twists that keep you interested. And in the middle of it all, a new romance starting up. Really liked Kat, the M.E., smart and goes after what she wants.
An interesting and factual story.
An interesting and factual story.
July 8, 2020
Presumption of Brilliance!
13 year old Emily is murdered without a single drop of blood being shed, though there's a small cut to her carotid artery. Within no time, the conspirators are booked. However, the accomplice to the murder is a juvenile and she backs out from testifying. Prosecutor Dave needs to present evidence against the murderer, which looks just impossible. Can the impossible become possible?
Read this legal thriller to know.
13 year old Emily is murdered without a single drop of blood being shed, though there's a small cut to her carotid artery. Within no time, the conspirators are booked. However, the accomplice to the murder is a juvenile and she backs out from testifying. Prosecutor Dave needs to present evidence against the murderer, which looks just impossible. Can the impossible become possible?
Read this legal thriller to know.
January 26, 2022
Three chapters and I'm out
The book opens with a gruesome crime scene, yet the law enforcement present seems to be enjoying it. There is a virtually bloodless corpse but no one seems concerned that there is no blood at the scene. And the police pick up a 15 year old female suspect and question her without a parent present. This author might want to check with some experts before he writes another book.
The book opens with a gruesome crime scene, yet the law enforcement present seems to be enjoying it. There is a virtually bloodless corpse but no one seems concerned that there is no blood at the scene. And the police pick up a 15 year old female suspect and question her without a parent present. This author might want to check with some experts before he writes another book.
April 18, 2023
Close to being 5 on 5. Actually 4.7/5. A very good legal thriller and the plot was amazingly narrated. As a reader of legal thrillers and have watched no. of legal series, upon reading the description I thought how on earth this story has over 200 pages of court scenes. Even though the plot and the narrative is good, from legal point of view I expected more from the prosecution point of view especially when I am reading other legal thrillers the case will be heavily stacked by the prosecutors.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 153 reviews