Some say with figures from the past it is wise not to put 21st century values on people from the 19th to early 20th centuries. Well I was born in the late 20th century. Lady Astor as the author likes to mention, if not coming right out and saying so, was a modern woman. What kind of modern woman was she? She was apparently a control freak, she was manipulative, domineering, selfish, inconsiderate, callous, harsh, rude, but somewhere in her "slight, frail" body a kind heart and a sharp wit. The examples of the latter was not used frequently, the reader was on more than one occasion assured she had a sharp wit, and a kind heart. The reading seemed more like an apologist than much else. This southern belle with her deep rooted old southern ways took the British world by storm. What was Britain of this time? In truth it was not full of morals, high fibre and the only good living was those that had money to throw around. Of course Lord and Lady Astor were a part of this clique. Not the Cliveden set of the Second World War fame but the Cliveden set that never knew hardship and want, who had servants ( in her father's day slaves), furs and everything they could possibly ever want while doing "good deeds" for the less fortunate, which amounted to softening the blows of the harsh every day life rather than eliminating the harshness of everyday life. Nancy Astor can be admired for being one of the first women into parliament, she can be admired for the Bills that were past that were of real benefit to people. But can she be admired as a person, an individual? For me I believe not. I have no expectations that the pioneering women should be angels, diplomatic, kind, considerate and worthy of admiration. Indeed they could swear a blue streak, put wifeliness and family first and be quite religious, however, it is hard to appreciate some when they are hypocritical and two-faced.