Since October 2017, after the Harvey Weinstein victims spoke out in a unified voice, there is little room for a work like The Five Acts of Diego Leon to have a public space in the art arena without a visceral cringe in disgust away from Alex Espinosa’s protagonist and the other deceitful men in his novel. Maybe I should have read this work before October 2017. But the American cultural landscape is shifting. And going back to seething in silence about the behavior offered in this text is no longer possible. Diego Leon (Cruz / Cortez) is a queer man in the 1920s and 1930s, in a society that does not allow any space for him to be who he is, a queer man. So to that end, Diego lies. As is necessary. Again, and again, and again. At no point does he ever become the kind of hero that one can empathize with or cheer for because his lies devastate the all women in his life. And this devastation is purposeful. It is this purposeful, cruel, and callous indifference that is no longer “art worthy” after October 2017.
So, I can’t offer the depth of empathy to Diego Leon (Cruz/Cortez) for which this author seems to be reaching. Diego Leon abandons Elva, his indigenous grandmother when he has more than enough money to provide for her into her old age. Instead he leaves her to a pauper’s death. Layer onto this financial abandonment the rejection of his indigenous history. At no point is there ever an indigenous voice to speak against the bigotry indigenous men and women confront in Mexico from the European upper class. (The perspective of an authentic indigenous voice needs its own detailed review. Looking for reviews by indigenous Mexicanos to offer one, but have not seen one on Goodreads.)
Diego Leon participates in breaking the heart of a young woman, Paloma, who has done nothing to deserve such heartbreak. He leaves his fiance on the day they are to be married. He could have put an end to the charade of a heterosexual marriage in some other way than abandoning Paloma and humiliating her on the day of their marriage. Instead, the reader is supposed to feel compassion for Diego’s deception because what he really wants and can’t have is an intimate relationship with Javier. The Grandfather, sensing Diego’s marital reticence, encourages him to behave indifferently to his future wife. The grandfather, Doroteo, openly brags about extramarital relationships to get the sexual gratification that he wants and encourages Diego Leon to do the same thing - mistakenly believing that Diego is reluctant to marry out of a heterosexual desire to have many sexual conquests. Again, the indifference to the pain caused to the women in their lives is beyond staggering.
Later, the reader learns that Carolina, Diego’s first theatre coach, has left her husband because of his infidelities. The repeated motif of betraying women without a single female voice challenging this disgusting norm leaves me completely unable to offer any empathy to Diego in his heartbroken rejection from Bill Cage. Diego simply receives what he has offered to all the women in his life - callous, indifferent betrayal.
When Diego arrives in Hollywood, he engages in a deceitful relationship with Fiona. She is clear in her desire to ultimately have marriage and a family, and Diego says the “I love you” words to her, leading Fiona to believe that her desires are his as well. It is necessary for him to offer this lie so he can maintain a facade of heterosexuality in an industry that does not forgive queerness. The duration of his relationship with Fiona, he cheats on her with Bill Cage, the Harvey Weinstein villain of the novel. Like Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cage sexually exploits the actors who want to “become stars”. He allows Diego to throw himself at him, offer up his body, and pleasure him in exchange for starring roles in studio scripts/productions. Diego should be offered compassion when Bill ultimately rejects him, but no female reader can surely give this nincompoop any compassion. Diego has done all along to women what Bill does to every man he makes a star.
Diego then has another circle of women around him whom he uses for appearances, including Alicia Prado. He allows himself to be seen with a beautiful woman (mind you, she’s using him as well), so he can maintain an appearance of virile, masculine heterosexuality. At the end of this novel, when it’s too late to challenge the deceptions, the misrepresentations, the belittlements, Diego can’t receive too much credibility in his sudden moral epiphany. After all, Diego began his acting career by playing Brutus, the backstabber who killed a friend. After being influenced by a fictional representation of Mexican Revolutionaries to be a fictional good father to a fictional son, Diego decides that in real life he’ll be a good father to his real son. Why couldn’t Diego have been persuaded by actual realities to be a good man in general? Yes, people are capable of changing, but Diego can’t be a creep for 99% of the novel, and then in the last 1% decide fatherhood matters to him.
The concluding 1% simply doesn’t hold with the previous 99%.
Where are the female voices to call out this disgusting behavior? Fiona speaks to Diego in ameliorating tones, as if somehow she forgives him. Which she may well feel. But how did she get to that place of tranquil forgiveness? And is it plausible to be so betrayed over and over, and then one year later be in that elevated zen space of forgiveness? Most women wouldn’t let Diego back in the door. Instead, she tells Diego that she will make sure their son knows who her father is, as if this will be a point of pride for the son. Why would a son be proud to call a serial deceiver a father? Why would a good loving mother want that model for her son? It’s as if Alex Espinosa doesn’t have a feminist bone in his body!
I’m still glad I read this work in my quest to read all things Latinx/Chicanx/Hispanic for one year. What I can take from this work is a new understanding of why Mexicans continued to come to America after the Mexican Revolution was over. Alex Espinosa weaves in Mexican history, particularly reference to Article 130 of the 1917 Mexican Constitution - when schools are secularized. The conflict between church and state leads to continued deaths. Religious persecution under a communist leadership pushes people into exile, and thus they immigrate to the US.
I’m also quite curious to read more about Mexican communists who came to America to help American workers unionize. I’m curious if there is any direct connection between Mexican communism and the racist “repatriation” of US citizens back to Mexico, or Mexican communism and the sharp rise of anti-communism that lead to the McCarthy Era. Alex Espinosa’s work has inspired me to do more research and reading. I can say that I love reading an author’s work where the research and history is craftily woven into the plot, but this love of learning can never diminish the tremendous disgust I have for an unchallenged and normalized behavior of deceiving and belittling women to get ahead in life.
Last question - Why is the cover a woman? The protagonist of this story is a macho, sexy, Latin Lover, not a high class woman.