Most Americans are familiar with the cry, "the Birtish are coming, the British are coming." In Texas there was a similar cry under very different circumstances, "the camels are coming! The camels are coming!"
Being a native Texan and avid history reader, over the years I've read allusion to camels as part of the state's history. I've even read of sighting in modern times. There were things I knew and there were things I THOUGHT I knew. In his latest work, Johnson clears it all up for me as he lays out the facts of the Army's Camel Corps experiment.
At the conclusion of the Capture of California during the Mexican-American War, as Ed Beale and Kit Carson make their way towards to D.C. to deliver reports on the victory to Secretary of War, Jefferson Davis, the two ponder the idea of using camels in the deserts of the southwest. Jefferson Davis becomes a strong proponenet of the concept. After being initially denied funds to procure camels, Congress eventually appropriates $30,000 for an initial test of the idea after rumors of a Mormon uprising reach D.C. On the first shipment thrity-three camels along with eight native "Arabs" ship from Smyrna to Indianoloa, TX. Upon arrival, “Some (Arabs) took one look at Texas and elected to go home.” (. But two, "Hi Jolly" and "Greek George", would remain, serve their adopted home with distinction, and become American legends. A camp site was constructed at modern-day Kerrville, Texas for the development of the experiement. “The first test of the camel’s capabilities came when six of them were sent with packs from Camp Verde sixty miles to San Antonio. It became a race between the camels and three wagons, each pulled by six mules. The mission was to return with oats and other supplies. The camels went directly through the hill country, where the wagons could not pass, picked up 608 pounds each, and returned to camp in fifty-four hours. The three mule wagon did succeed in carrying 1,834 pounds each in ninety six hours but required frequent stops to rest and drink water” (pg 110). Camels would go on to serve on road construction crews, surveying projects in California, in campaigns against Native Americans, and at least one would find its way into a Confederacy regiment during the Civil War.
As a writer, Johnson proves to be a master storyteller with a brilliant sense of timing. He seems to employ a technique that introduces a theme, builds a story and then revisits the introdcution. Although it didn't bother me, I could understand how it might frustrate some readers. Therefore, I will caution anyone starting this read if you feel like Johnson is jumping around, be patient. The stories do tie together and the groundwork is imprortant for the context of the overall story. What I thought Johnson was superb at was capturing the spirit of the time. This was the pique of the destruction of many Native American tribes. The Mojave tribe, of which I was completely ignorant of, was the tribe of focus here. “He (Beale) also puzzled over another thought: what changed a happy race of people (Mojave) in the river valley into murderers?” (pg 271). Johson meticulously showed how that evolved. I was particularly interested in how, according to Johnson, the Mormons manipulated the natives for their own agenda (Mountain Meadows Massacre). But, it was also a time when Americans were creative and willing to sacrifice for the sheer sense of adventure. In response to the first sighting of a steamship on the river, Beale observed, “I felt jealous of Johnson’s achievement and it is to be hoped the government will substantially reward the enterprising spirit which prompted a citizen, at his own risk and a great hazard, to undertake so perilous and uncertain an expedition."
As a Texan, I couldn't help but appreciate the focus on a couple of historical figures important to this state's history: Chalie Goodnight and James Bowie.
I have one tiny criticism: Johson makes repeatedly makes the claim that Buchanan used the Mormon issue to deflect attention from slavery. This may very well be true and is a tactic used over and over by elected officials. It is used widely today. However, it is widely documented, and Johnson even admits it once, that Buchanan campaigned on dealing with both slavery and the "Mormon Problem". If he is going to take the stance that Buchanan's focus on the Mormon chuch was a red herring rather than following up on a campaign promise, I think he had a responsibility to cite some sources. This is so tiny and not the main focus of the work that it didn't cause me much angst.
Finally, I found the story of "Old Douglas" and the death of Hi Jolly particularly poignant