UPDATE (July 14, 2013): Just finished the book. The last time 550 pages were this compelling was when I read Randy Shiltz' AND THE BAND PLAYED ON, about the history of the AIDS crisis.
That topic occupies only one small chapter toward the end of THE VILLAGE, but the author has patiently documented the entire 200-year history of this neighborhood with exacting research to show the outsider history of the artist/writer/musician/drinker/hustler residents throughout each era.
By the time we reach the mid-eighties, New York is in crisis, and Society's (President Reagan/Mayor Koch) priorities are focused on real estate, tourism, and respectability. The fate of gay men dying of AIDS in decrepit waterfront outlying areas, not to mention the preservation of a creative environment, are steamrollered by more powerful economic vehicles.
In most biographies and histories, the end of the book signals an anti-climax. The best years of the characters are behind them; what is left is sadness, loss, and nostalgia.
There is a element of that in this story of Greenwich Village (and the East- and West-Villages), yet Strausbaugh has written an elegant tale that I consider breathtaking. His research skills and determination are grand. Perhaps this is also a reflection of his first-person knowledge of the context of the Village. His ability to mention less-er known figures, for instance, in gay history, such as the musician Michael Callen who pioneered safer-sex standards, and the feminist poet Audre Lorde, as well as the lesbian icon, Alix Dobkin gave me a point of identification. While his references were brief, they were accurate.
Other notes that he struck, such as recurring quotes from the composer David Amran, the political history of Ed Koch, and even the fact that folk singer Dave van Ronk stepped in and got arrested during the Stonewall Riots (despite the fact that he was not gay, and was just investigating the hubbub from the pub across the street) increase the richness of this account, and give the reader an incentive to explore various avenues further in other books.
Reading this book was a milestone in my personal education.
Final note: In subsequent editions, Editors, please include a MAP of the Village!
______________________________________________________________________________
My initial comments (June 2013):
Fascinating book. I am only up to page 100. Already it has led me to the 1955 movie, MY SISTER EILEEN, in the credits of which I learn that "Robert Fosse" is none other than Bob Fosse. (and watching Janet Leigh and the other cast members dance, I recognize his choreography immediately! Twenty years before CABARET made him a household word.)
Other revelations: In 1917, the Village was already suffering gentrification. The description could have been written today in any city in America. Impecunious bohemians/artists/writers establish the flavor of a neighborhood, drawn there by cheap rents, coexisting with other low-rent types in squalor. They attract the attention of bourgeois/yuppie wanna-bees, who are attracted by the authenticity of the architecture and the association with famous or infamous personalities. They drive up the prices, and cause builders to raze old historic buildings to create new upper crust residences. My goodness, I had no idea this was happening in 1917!
The description of the emigration to Paris during this period is so interesting. The core of the creative types, priced out by the bourgeois (proto-yuppies) to Paris, where post-WWI economy was favorable to American dollars explains how these Village low-rents could afford to live in Paris.
This book is so rich in explanations for trends we have all heard about, but the detail is such a revelation.
*****
Okay, now I'm up to page 400. The book remains as fascinating as it did 300 pages ago. It has led me to another movie: Roger Corman's 1959 BUCKET OF BLOOD, a noir story with a satirical depiction of artists and intellectuals hanging out in a late-50s-era beatnik coffee house. The book laments the touristication of the Village, in which black-turtle-neck-beret-wearing suburban young adults show up in Village coffee houses (after obtaining this dress code from some published manual), and have trouble feeling that the true locals are authentic, since they don't conform to the characature.
I think the most interesting part for me was the recurring references to David Amram, whose name I remember from the 1960s when Leonard Bernstein was so much in the news for making classical music relevant to young people. Apparently Amram was way out there! (He wrote the score for the movie THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE.)
The other conclusion I am drawing is that what people my age know about the Village (references to the folk music revival of the 1960s and the emergence of Bob Dylan) are so tip-of-the-ice-berg! There was so much other radical stuff going on, left over from the 40s and 50s, such as theater, art, philosophy, and of course, alcoholism.
It really is unfortunate, as another commentor wrote, that the author did not include at least one map, considering all the detailed geography being mentioned. If I ever felt that I had a sense of direction, reading this book has completely discombobled it.
In spite of that, this is just an exhaustively researched work, written with a suitable detachment that just thinly conceals the author's affinity with the gay community; just enough to convince the reader that he most likely understands what he is documenting.
Great book.