Very convenient that this chapter of Honeybee Democracy was published separately. Honey bees provide us with many useful products and services (like honey, wax, and pollination), and examples of virtue (like cooperation, industriousness, and self-sacrifice). To that latter list Prof. Seeley has added five lessons of good group decision-making. This is impressive enough just as an example of animal sophistication, but the lessons are actually useful.
However, Prof. Seeley forgot a lesson, which should be inserted at the No. 2 position: Make group decisions sparingly, only when necessary, or when it at least makes sense. Groups are better than individuals at some decisions, but not most. Honey bees vote on very few questions. In his more recent book The Lives of Bees, Prof. Seeley describes all manner of decisions made by individual bees according to their local knowledge, without central coordination. One of the biggest myths about honey bees is that they are centrally controlled by the queen. In fact, they almost always act independently, doing what they see needs doing (“scratching their own itches”, as they say in the open-source software community), but sometimes coordinating with other individuals. I’m not competent to describe all this, so I’ll just recommend The Lives of Bees, and let Prof. Seeley update his list when and how he sees fit.