What do you think?
Rate this book
Power and Interdependence
A landmark work of international relations theory, Power and Interdependence first published in 1977 and posited a radically comprehensive explanation of the mechanics driving world affairs–“power politics” on one hand and “complex interdependence” on the other hand. This widely influential book reexamined the military and economic interests of state and non-state actors, and in an argument made before the end of the Cold War, the authors broadened the prevailing realist worldview of the time and anticipated many of the developments in our modern era of globalization. With a new preface by the authors and a foreword by Fareed Zakaria that looks at world affairs after the Cold War, the terrorist attacks of September 11, and the global financial crisis, Power and Interdependence is required reading for all students of international relations.
Paperback
First published January 1, 1977
About the author
Robert O. Keohane
42 books54 followers
Robert O. Keohane
(b. 1941) is an American scholar of international relations, best known for his work on neoliberal institutionalism. His numerous books include After Hegemony (1984) and Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (2002). Currently a professor at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University, Keohane has received numerous awards for his scholarship. Among these, he was honored with the Centennial Medal of the Harvard Graduate School in 2012. Keohane received his bachelor's degree in 1961 from Shimer College, a Great Books school where he now sits on the Board of Trustees. He received his graduate education at Harvard, where he completed his Ph.D. in 1966. (from Shimer College Wiki)
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15 reviews
February 17, 2013
The world is shrinking. We become closer to each other and we find out that power and conflict still matters. The manner is different, less force, more negotiations, while we still need to understand the world we are living in. Written by two major figures of modern social studies, Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye, Power and Interdependence is the best book about globalization that I`ve read, even if the term wasn`t fashionable in 1977, at the time of its writing.
The late Joseph Nye Jr. influenced both academia and the political language. Everyone has heard of soft power. Alongside Robert Keohane, he established, in Power and Interdependence, the principles of neoliberal institutionalism, and I`m reviewing the Romanian edition. This approach is still influential today, probably because the trends identified in the book still matter. We live in a half-integrated world, where brute force is important, but a lot of things happen besides that.
There is interconnectedness and interdependence. The last one is important for Robert O. Keohane and Joseph Nye Jr., because it`s about costs. Here there is another division in sensitivity, in which the setting is taken for granted and vulnerability, in which the context is malleable. This ability to pay less for the ability to change the basis of a relationship is a form of relational power, called asymmetric interdependence: he who has more options, has more influence.
Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye don`t make a modernist (or globalist) argument. They try to show us that the classical realist framework doesn't always work and they offer a complementary alternative. Called complex interdependence, it`s defined as a combination of multiple channels of communication, lack of a hierarchy of issues and low utility for force, and it`s designed to work mostly for the developed world. The chapter on Canada from Power and Interdependence is very instructive today, and the authors show that, as interdependence with the US grew, the Ottawa government was more agile and won in the disputes with the US, than its capabilities would have allowed.
Does that mean that Donald Trump is right or that Washington pursued misguided policies? Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye make the second argument in Power and Interdependence. Is not always that the US is in decline or that the partners are cheaters, it is the exaggeration of the role played military power, which should be blamed. The book has many critics and is considered too naïve or too close to mainstream ideas, though it does contain a balanced framework which helps the reader to navigate the muddy waters of today.
The late Joseph Nye Jr. influenced both academia and the political language. Everyone has heard of soft power. Alongside Robert Keohane, he established, in Power and Interdependence, the principles of neoliberal institutionalism, and I`m reviewing the Romanian edition. This approach is still influential today, probably because the trends identified in the book still matter. We live in a half-integrated world, where brute force is important, but a lot of things happen besides that.
There is interconnectedness and interdependence. The last one is important for Robert O. Keohane and Joseph Nye Jr., because it`s about costs. Here there is another division in sensitivity, in which the setting is taken for granted and vulnerability, in which the context is malleable. This ability to pay less for the ability to change the basis of a relationship is a form of relational power, called asymmetric interdependence: he who has more options, has more influence.
Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye don`t make a modernist (or globalist) argument. They try to show us that the classical realist framework doesn't always work and they offer a complementary alternative. Called complex interdependence, it`s defined as a combination of multiple channels of communication, lack of a hierarchy of issues and low utility for force, and it`s designed to work mostly for the developed world. The chapter on Canada from Power and Interdependence is very instructive today, and the authors show that, as interdependence with the US grew, the Ottawa government was more agile and won in the disputes with the US, than its capabilities would have allowed.
Does that mean that Donald Trump is right or that Washington pursued misguided policies? Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye make the second argument in Power and Interdependence. Is not always that the US is in decline or that the partners are cheaters, it is the exaggeration of the role played military power, which should be blamed. The book has many critics and is considered too naïve or too close to mainstream ideas, though it does contain a balanced framework which helps the reader to navigate the muddy waters of today.
August 24, 2012
In all fairness, this was not a horrible book. Rather, my review is based on how much I "enjoyed" it, which was not very much.
From the perspective of a student of Political Science or International Relations, this book was useful in understanding the theory of complex interdependence, which serves as the opposite of the traditional Realist framework. After defining complex interdependence and outlining the main characteristics, the authors then apply their theory to four different examples. In the first half, the authors address ocean issues and international monetary issues. In the second half, they address the US-Canada relationship and the US-Australia relationship.
Since this book was published back in 1977, there have been two additional chapters tacked on in recent editions. Chapter nine looks at the information age and chapter ten examines globalism.
Overall, while I found this book about as interesting as most textbooks (in other words, I would not be picking this up as a pleasure read), it was well written and researched. The points were clear and thoroughly formulated.
From the perspective of a student of Political Science or International Relations, this book was useful in understanding the theory of complex interdependence, which serves as the opposite of the traditional Realist framework. After defining complex interdependence and outlining the main characteristics, the authors then apply their theory to four different examples. In the first half, the authors address ocean issues and international monetary issues. In the second half, they address the US-Canada relationship and the US-Australia relationship.
Since this book was published back in 1977, there have been two additional chapters tacked on in recent editions. Chapter nine looks at the information age and chapter ten examines globalism.
Overall, while I found this book about as interesting as most textbooks (in other words, I would not be picking this up as a pleasure read), it was well written and researched. The points were clear and thoroughly formulated.
July 23, 2024
"Power and Interdependence," written by Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., is a seminal text that has fundamentally influenced the study of international relations. The book explores the intricate web of global interactions and the shifting dynamics of power in an increasingly interconnected world. Here, I will provide a detailed review based on key themes and concepts from the book, incorporating the outlined content.
Interdependence in the Modern World
The authors begin by acknowledging that the world has become interdependent in economics, communications, and human aspirations. This interdependence is often referred to metaphorically as the creation of a "global village" and a "world without borders." Such descriptions highlight how advances in technology and globalization have shrunk the distances between nations, fostering closer ties and mutual dependencies.
However, Keohane and Nye caution against simplistic celebrations of this interdependence, a notion they refer to as "globaloney." They argue that interdependence is not merely an analytical concept but also a rhetorical device employed by publicists and statesmen. The real task is to analyze the politics of interdependence, not to celebrate it blindly.
National Security and Economic Relations
One of the critical discussions in the book revolves around national security symbolism and the realist mode of analysis. Traditionally, national security has been dominated by military concerns. However, as the descriptive accuracy of such views declined, so did their symbolic power. Keohane and Nye note that significant changes in economic relations among advanced industrialized countries often seemed insignificant in the traditional national security paradigm.
They argue that no nation or group of nations can gain by pushing beyond the limits that sustain world economic growth. The rhetoric of zero-sum and non-zero-sum games is employed to highlight that international relations are not merely a matter of one side's gain being another's loss.
Pure Dependence and Interdependence
The distinction between pure dependence and interdependence is essential. Power, they suggest, can be conceived in terms of control over outcomes and tolerable costs. In analyzing the politics of interdependence, the focus shifts to which actors can set the rules of the game. Sensitivity interdependence (how quickly and significantly changes in one country affect another) is often less critical than vulnerability interdependence (the relative costs of adjusting to changes).
Historical and Contemporary Examples
Keohane and Nye provide numerous historical and contemporary examples to illustrate their points. For instance, they reference Japan's use of military force in 1941 to address economic vulnerabilities and the United States' subtle threats during the 1975 oil crises. They also mention the superior position of Canadians in economic issues like oil and natural gas exports without fearing military retaliation from the United States.
In discussing various international policy areas including aid to less developed countries, environmental protection, and international trade the authors highlight the complexity of interdependence and the role of international organizations in managing these issues.
Distribution of Power and Regime Changes
The distribution of power in interstate systems is analyzed using analogies from economics, describing systems as unipolar, bipolar, multipolar, and dispersed. Keohane and Nye emphasize that regime changes in issue areas like international monetary policy and ocean governance have varied in their pace and impact. For example, significant changes in international monetary policy occurred in 1914, 1931, 1944, and 1971, while changes in ocean governance were more gradual but still significant.
The authors argue that politics does not stop at the waters’ edge, and intense relationships of mutual influence exist between countries where military force is irrelevant. They also address the increasing role of terrorism as a political weapon and the impact of socially mobilized populations and changing technology on global security dynamics.
Realism and Complex Interdependence
In contrasting realism with complex interdependence, Keohane and Nye highlight the limitations of realist thought, which traditionally overlooks economic interdependence and the multiplicity of channels through which international interactions occur. They argue that complex interdependence better captures the contemporary reality of international relations, characterized by multiple channels of contact and diverse issues that transcend traditional power politics.
The book also addresses the impact of communication and transportation technologies, such as jet aircraft and satellites, which have significantly reduced the physical and psychological distances between nations. This technological progress is part of a long-term historical trend that has reshaped the dynamics of international relations.
Conclusion
"Power and Interdependence" is a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the complexities of global interdependence and the shifting nature of power in international relations. Keohane and Nye's work remains highly relevant, offering valuable frameworks for understanding the politics of a world increasingly defined by interconnectedness and mutual dependencies. By challenging traditional realist paradigms and emphasizing the importance of economic and non-military issues, the book provides a nuanced perspective on the global village and the intricate interplay of power and interdependence.
Interdependence in the Modern World
The authors begin by acknowledging that the world has become interdependent in economics, communications, and human aspirations. This interdependence is often referred to metaphorically as the creation of a "global village" and a "world without borders." Such descriptions highlight how advances in technology and globalization have shrunk the distances between nations, fostering closer ties and mutual dependencies.
However, Keohane and Nye caution against simplistic celebrations of this interdependence, a notion they refer to as "globaloney." They argue that interdependence is not merely an analytical concept but also a rhetorical device employed by publicists and statesmen. The real task is to analyze the politics of interdependence, not to celebrate it blindly.
National Security and Economic Relations
One of the critical discussions in the book revolves around national security symbolism and the realist mode of analysis. Traditionally, national security has been dominated by military concerns. However, as the descriptive accuracy of such views declined, so did their symbolic power. Keohane and Nye note that significant changes in economic relations among advanced industrialized countries often seemed insignificant in the traditional national security paradigm.
They argue that no nation or group of nations can gain by pushing beyond the limits that sustain world economic growth. The rhetoric of zero-sum and non-zero-sum games is employed to highlight that international relations are not merely a matter of one side's gain being another's loss.
Pure Dependence and Interdependence
The distinction between pure dependence and interdependence is essential. Power, they suggest, can be conceived in terms of control over outcomes and tolerable costs. In analyzing the politics of interdependence, the focus shifts to which actors can set the rules of the game. Sensitivity interdependence (how quickly and significantly changes in one country affect another) is often less critical than vulnerability interdependence (the relative costs of adjusting to changes).
Historical and Contemporary Examples
Keohane and Nye provide numerous historical and contemporary examples to illustrate their points. For instance, they reference Japan's use of military force in 1941 to address economic vulnerabilities and the United States' subtle threats during the 1975 oil crises. They also mention the superior position of Canadians in economic issues like oil and natural gas exports without fearing military retaliation from the United States.
In discussing various international policy areas including aid to less developed countries, environmental protection, and international trade the authors highlight the complexity of interdependence and the role of international organizations in managing these issues.
Distribution of Power and Regime Changes
The distribution of power in interstate systems is analyzed using analogies from economics, describing systems as unipolar, bipolar, multipolar, and dispersed. Keohane and Nye emphasize that regime changes in issue areas like international monetary policy and ocean governance have varied in their pace and impact. For example, significant changes in international monetary policy occurred in 1914, 1931, 1944, and 1971, while changes in ocean governance were more gradual but still significant.
The authors argue that politics does not stop at the waters’ edge, and intense relationships of mutual influence exist between countries where military force is irrelevant. They also address the increasing role of terrorism as a political weapon and the impact of socially mobilized populations and changing technology on global security dynamics.
Realism and Complex Interdependence
In contrasting realism with complex interdependence, Keohane and Nye highlight the limitations of realist thought, which traditionally overlooks economic interdependence and the multiplicity of channels through which international interactions occur. They argue that complex interdependence better captures the contemporary reality of international relations, characterized by multiple channels of contact and diverse issues that transcend traditional power politics.
The book also addresses the impact of communication and transportation technologies, such as jet aircraft and satellites, which have significantly reduced the physical and psychological distances between nations. This technological progress is part of a long-term historical trend that has reshaped the dynamics of international relations.
Conclusion
"Power and Interdependence" is a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the complexities of global interdependence and the shifting nature of power in international relations. Keohane and Nye's work remains highly relevant, offering valuable frameworks for understanding the politics of a world increasingly defined by interconnectedness and mutual dependencies. By challenging traditional realist paradigms and emphasizing the importance of economic and non-military issues, the book provides a nuanced perspective on the global village and the intricate interplay of power and interdependence.
Read
November 19, 2011Keohane and Nye set up what becomes the dominant school of thought in the neoliberal camp of IR thinking: neoliberal institutionalism.
May 18, 2019
I'm not an expert in the field, so this may be expected, but I found it hard to follow the arguments at times. I think that's sort of a positive and negative of their approach. It produces something that's very honest and very interesting but also something that it's hard to draw firm conclusions about. This work really opened up some new ways of thinking, since then the ideas seem to have struggled to find their footing amid the complicated interplay between states, actors, citizens, and thinkers.
December 19, 2023
Plauzibilă si aplicabila teoria, dar stufoasa și plina de detalii tehnice cartea
March 21, 2017
Nice book
January 13, 2022
Keohane and Nye's 'Power and interdependence' continues to be a useful resource for all students of international relations. The fact that the book is nearing 45 years since the original publication date, yet the general theoretical grounds of the book hold quite well, is incredible. The prescience of predictions made within the book with respect to control of credible information, even as the authors address this on an international rather than domestic level, is equally profound.
While I don't agree with everything Keohane and Nye argue, interdependence is an 'ideal state' so perhaps my critiques have more to do with distance from the ideal than the ideal model itself. My other criticisms are ideas that reductions in hard power have no corresponding drop in soft power; I disagree and I'd argue they are more related than the authors give them credit for.
I recommend this book for all students of IR.
While I don't agree with everything Keohane and Nye argue, interdependence is an 'ideal state' so perhaps my critiques have more to do with distance from the ideal than the ideal model itself. My other criticisms are ideas that reductions in hard power have no corresponding drop in soft power; I disagree and I'd argue they are more related than the authors give them credit for.
I recommend this book for all students of IR.
January 12, 2016
Keohane demuestra por qué en las relaciones internacionales es el fundador del institucionalismo neoliberal. Desde una crítica impone la interdependencia compleja dejando de lado el realismo y desencadena las metas de los estados, analiza los modelos económicos (impuestos y no impuestos) pero su crítica más compleja es al capitalismo moderno que ha permitido el desarrollo donde le conviene al una super estructura hegemónica. La cooperación internacional no es la resolución a la interdependencia luego de caracterizar a ésta en distintos escenarios alejada del determinismo económico.
April 25, 2015
This is a core text for International Relations. It dates from the 70's but has been updated with a couple of new chapters. It is a core liberal institutionalism text--the idea that the system of states is characterized by complex interdependence and that institutions are the key to peace. If you want to understand the foreign policy of the Clinton administration, you will find it here. Ditto the ideology of "Davos-man".
June 12, 2014
My impression: Swung for the fences and hit a ground-rule double. Their questions are, "What are the major features of world politics when interdependence, particularly economic interdependence, is extensive? And How and why do international regimes exist?
April 17, 2009
The best book in International Relations.
March 24, 2010
Very good book on international relations. It's a must read for those who are interested in IR.
November 1, 2014
Keohane and Nye have the gift of writing about very interesting subjects in a highly boring fashion. That alone deserves 3 stars.
April 14, 2017
In this book we see how, moreover in this book we can see what is happening right now and thanks to the interdependence theory we can give a different understanding.
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15 reviews