The field of biolinguistics is a very interesting one; however, it seems to have been permeated by conceptual arguments, which, no matter how much they appeal to us, cannot be taken as conclusive. A conclusive argument is one that is experimentally backed.
This book has an intriguing premise. It calls into question Hauser et al’s (2002) claim that recursion is human-specific. Rather, the authors argue that grammar emerged from a biological system that allows sequencing items and stores sets of items and sets of sets in active memory.
The book presupposes some background in linguistics and biology. The authors didn’t do a good job of explaining the scientific jargon used in the book, which made the book hard to understand. I think the book would’ve been much easier for me had there been clearer definitions for those terms.
Overall, I think the book is a worthwhile read despite its difficulty, and I recommend reading it.