Like its predecessors, this Fifth Edition of The Practice of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice (by Ronet Bachman and Russell K. Schutt) provides complete coverage of the use and results of the contemporary methods employed in criminology and criminal justice research today. Specifically designed for undergraduate and beginning graduate criminal justice courses and programs, this text teaches research design and techniques within the context of substantive criminology and criminal justice issues of interest to students who will become professionals in the field. Students learn about the wide realm of research methods available to them, delve deeper into topics relevant to their field of study, and benefit from the wide variety of exercises included in the text and on the student study website that help them practice as they learn.
Interesting read. There are several sections of interest for me. For example, the section titled Ethical Issues in Experimental Research.
I find sections like this informative that contain valuable information about important ethical issues that have been conducted during experiments throughout history. This information is something that we should be aware of to prevent future ethical violations.
There are several other sections that I would put into this review but I do not believe people want to read that type of review.
Overall, I do believe that others should read this. It is a "simple" read, a rather long - simple read but it is worth it. I would rate it 5 stars but since it is an educational/textbook. I have to rate it at 3 stars because of the neutrality.
***This is a policy I have to keep implicit and explicit biases to a minimum***
This is a great textbook, with charts, tables and graphics to help with concepts. There are interesting examples of research projects used throughout the book. Each chapter has an example of someone working in the CJ field and specializing in whatever the chapter is presenting. I would recommend this book to professors.
The number of times that this book states, "This should be intuitive" in lieu of actually explaining a concept should have stopped it before it ever went to print. That's not acceptable for a textbook.
This text is a mess of convoluted explanations and bad definitions. For example, here is the text's definition of measurement validity: "The type of validity that is achieved when a measure measures what it is presumed to measure" (85).
It's my school-book, so I am learning a lot about research methods that I mis-learned in undergrad. If you're in the CJ field and need an additional methods reference book (if this isn't assigned) then I recommend it as an easy book to comprehend.