Anne Sexton – A Self-Portrait in Letters
… As you say, I do act aggressive. I think the trouble is that my mind, my thinking mind, is aggressive. I am a machine of ideas. I adore (in a funny way) to think. I mean in a class like that I am very stimulated . . . but in fact, I do not mean to really be there after I have spoken . . . I often think of your analysis. I would like speaking, but not being there. It would be like your “Red Studio.” And that turns us back to figuring YOU out. I like figuring you out. You are so human and puzzling and my splendid oaf.
(p. 49).
Frankly, De, I’m lost. And it’s my own fault. It’s about time I figured out that I can’t ask people to keep me found.
(p.75)
One last thing from old Wisdom Sexton here [ . . . ] I think that writers [ . . . ] must try not to avoid knowing what is happening. Everyone has somewhere the ability to mask the events of pain and sorrow, call it shock… when someone dies for instance you have this shock that carries you over it, makes it bearable. But the creative person must not use this mechanism anymore than they have to in order to keep breathing. Other people may. But not you, not us. Writing is “life” in capsule and the writer must feel every bump edge scratch ouch in order to know the real furniture of his capsule.
(p.105)
I do know this – I’m beginning to learn how to love without feeling it necessary to be all things to the person I love. In other words – how to love you without having to prove it by sleeping with you.
(p. 124)
Misspelling masculinity as ‘musculinity’…
Please, when I come home, don’t forget the “soul”. . . and I don’t mean “sweet sayings”. . . I mean the truth, the sharing of our inmost thoughts, good or bad . . . lost or comforting. That is the soul. I think it. The soul, is I think, a human being who speaks with the pressure of death at his head. That’s how I’d phrase it. The self in trouble . . . not just the self without love (as us) but the self as it will always be (with gun at its head finally) . . . To live and know it is only for a moment . . . that is to know “the soul” . . . and it increases closeness and despair and happiness . . . My life with you increases all these things because I value it so much.
(p.208)
You are my life and what I breathe you breathe and ever so. But not for romantic songs. For reality and the common daily life. All things of myself I want to share with you. I try to do. Sometimes it is hard to get through, but I always want to. Despite my sickness, I have grown. In my growth I learned some important things. One of them is that I pick you. Not just that I need you (for I do) but that even without the need I can make a choice and the choice is you.
(p.213)
And from something I read a few months ago and the source is forgotten . . . “the uncommitted life is not worth living.”
(p.231)
And I say to myself that the trouble with life is that people are strangers.
(p.239)
Language has nothing to do with rational thought. I think that’s why I get so horribly furious and disturbed with rational thought.
Language is the opposite of the way a machine works.
Language is poetry, maybe? But not all language is poetry. Nor is all poetry language.
That’s the trouble with me.
Language is (i.e.) when I said “I have room.” [ . . . ]
Who me? Sailing around like crazy in LANGUAGE whatever it is and then brought up short by reality (what is it, really?) . . .
[…]
Well, nevermind. I think language is beautiful. I even think insanity is beautiful (surely the root of language), except that it is painful.
Language is verbalizing the non-verbal. (That’s what makes it so complicated.) Holding hands is better than saying “I love you.”
When Kayo shoots squirrels it is better than saying “I hate you.”
When Sarah plays she is saying “I love myself again.”
. . . that’s part of language. Language in action is symbolic. Language in words is, too, but it is more difficult to follow.
(p.245)
I cannot promise that I am geared to your kind of self. I think maybe I am. But I cannot promise. I do not know you well enough yet. I can promise that I will not hurt or presume upon the self you offer to me. I can tell you this as a friend who trusts – I trust that you do not lie to me. I trust what I met of you.
(p.277)
Yes. You are very intense and so am I. However, I am married to a very intense, practical SQUARE. He is good for me for he has complete plans on how to run each day. He is with the world. I am not of it whatsoever. You? Perhaps only your wife is of the world. And maybe you and I are otherworldly – poets, to be exact. Poets can’t live for /die for / live with/ breathe in nothing but themselves – they need the sensible people, the roots, the down the house world of people. You need them. I need them. We cannot exist without them.
(p.293)
--Be your own woman. Belong to those you love. Talk to my poems, and talk to your heart […].
(p.424