Combining real-life cases of medical detection and courtroom drama, the author explains how doctors arrive at diagnoses, and how physicians can assist in a patient's search for truth
Harold L. Klawans was an academic neurologist who launched a parallel career as a writer. Klawans was born in Chicago. After graduating with an M.D. degree from the University of Illinois in 1962, Dr. Klawans became a neurologist and professor of neurology and pharmacology at Rush Medical College.
5 sterren voor de verhalen en het thema , en dan wat minder omdat er plots blanco pagina’s waren bv 226/227 ,en dat was een vijf maal zo , …. Eerst dacht ikzelf neurologische problemen te hebben , maar nee, telkens als ik keek bleven ze blanco , …. Ik kwam verbeelding tekort om de waargebeurde verhalen zelf in te vullen , …. Bij waargebeurde is soms meer verbeelding nodig ( sommige waren behoorlijk bizar) Verder vind ik het wel een boeiend thema geneeskunde en recht , beide beroepstakken waar best geen fouten in gebeuren , maar bevolkt door mensen ,… En ook beide onderhevig aan tijdsgeest , wanneer veranderend inzicht precies , bij hoeveel zaken , gevallen , ? Misschien soms ook iets botter , andere tijdsgeest (?). bv deze inleiding van Groucho Marx : dat knappe gezicht heeft ze van haar vader . Hij is plastisch chirurg Maar veelal ook leuk , bv deze van Henry David Thoreau : Hoed je voor alle ondernemingen waarvoor nieuwe kleren nodig zijn . Ik zou het boek aanraden aan mensen die curieus zijn in recht / geneeskunde en goede verhalen , (van 1991 ). maar de thema’s en moeilijkheden blijven toch wat hetzelfde. 4 sterren .
This book is just a series of times where our author had to act as an expert witness in court for a patient or company. + some other stories added in there which ultimately took the one star off. Yeah, they had to do with law and medicine but they weren't his experience. The author explained everything so well so that everyone would understand what was going on. I feel like I learned a lot about neurology :)
This book is a collection of true stories told by neurologist Harold Klawans about his experiences as an expert witness in medical malpractice suits that took place in the 1970's and 1980's. This book gives interesting insight both into the medical and legal side of each story, which I think is unique. Klawans is often compared with Oliver Sacks who more famously and popularly writes in this genre. I attempted to read Sacks's The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales and honestly just couldn't get into it, which surprised me. I just prefer Klawans's writing style and have also read his books Strange Behavior: Tales of Evolutionary Neurology and Defending The Cavewoman: And Other Tales Of Evolutionary Neurology, which I enjoyed.
I first was introduced to Trials Of An Expert Witness: Tales Of Clinical Neurology And The Law as an undergraduate and absolutely loved it. I was taking some sort of neuropsych/ethics class and the professor gave excerpts from this book as reading assignments. I was so fascinated I got the whole book from the library to read. Reading it now years later, I can't say I'd give it that same 5-star review I did previously. I think partly since going to graduate school and working in a medical setting, so much of what was so exciting and interesting learning something new is, well, no longer new. Also I did not recall the somewhat racist comments regarding foreign doctors sprinkled in there every once in a while. I got the vibe of "this patient didn't get appropriate care... well she had that asian/arab doctor who talked with an accent. wink wink". I guess that attitude was okay in 1991? Rather off-putting. But aside from that, the book is still very good and I would recommend it to others.
This book magnificently intertwines medicine with law. Klawans wrote each chapter in a style similar to a mystery novel in that I found myself wondering how the hospital or doctors had deviated from the standard of care for each patient. He first introduces the patient, allows you to get attached, and then reveals the issue. I was able to learn a lot about neurological disorders but also about "real world" law by reading this book. I appreciate that Klawans does not use flowery language and instead gets to the meat of the issue in this book. That being said, if you're looking for a piece a great literature this is not for you. Klawans uses a lot of dialogue and he is certainly not verbose. Also, I was not impressed that he used the term, "crazy" to describe some patients. Not only was it offensive but it was simplistic and not language I would expect a doctor to use. Overall, this was a unique book that I enjoyed. I recommend it to anyone interested in medicine, particularly neurological disorders, and law.
The other book in the same vein as the previous two is Trials of an Expert Witness: Tales of Clinical Neurology and the Law. I didn’t re-read this one because, as I had mentioned above, I was busy reading Doc Savage fanfic but in glancing through the book, I remember enjoying the read and the title pretty much explains what the book is about. This book has a bit more of a broader audience, those interested in medical narratives as well as medicine and the law (but without all the tedious law-stuff).