TL;DR: Lacey’s work is a fun romp through history, though I had are a few minor problems with his choices.
When interpreting a literary work, the reader sometimes must make a distinction between what the author intends and what the author achieves. I think that distinction should be made for Lacey’s work too, as I do not think that they are the same thing.
Let me start by talking about what I believe Lacey intended to achieve in his work. I think he wished to set out great, captivating stories from British history. He carefully picked each one for its interest for the general reader because he wanted to ensure that almost any person would find these tales interesting. His choices were made with a fair eye to his project, and I think he accomplished his goal as an author.
However, as readers we are still allowed to look beyond the project and see what else Lacey accidentally achieved. In no particular order, here are the consequences of Lacey’s choices:
-His work takes on the tone and scope of an informal history of the British Isles. Since he starts at the early age of 7150AD and then progresses through stories that cover the major events of British history, and since he does a fair job of tying those stories together across the ages (the reference notes in the text make it easy to pick up and read any random entry while still getting a pretty good cross-referencing), his work isn’t just Tales from English History it is, rather, the tale of English history. To put that a bit more clearly: If you want to read about the history of England but need a nice starting point to get the overall scope, this is a great volume for you. While the history isn’t by any stretch of the imagination complete (this is simply not his project), it is a nice starting point.
-His work also does a fair job of balancing tales that speak to the brave men and women from English history. As a father of a daughter, I always enjoy finding true tales of brave heroines I can share with her; these serve as great role models for her, and these brave ladies demonstrate what is possible. Lacey chooses interesting tales of women who put themselves in danger for their beliefs. This includes obvious choices like Elizabeth I and Queen Victoria, but Lacey also discussed less obvious heroines like Boadicea, Fanny Burney (whose tale of an encounter with cancer is harrowing), Mary Wollstonecraft, and Emily Davison. For a general reader with no knowledge of these women, these tales are welcome additions to the usual male-dominated stories many of us grew up with. In other words, share this book with your daughters.
-Now I want to touch on a bit of criticism. As you have seen, Lacey has done a great job of accomplishing certain feats in his book. I must note that maintaining a classless narrative is not one of them. Lacey’s stories all seem to be about the rich, the powerful, or the tragic. While I understand as an intelligent reader that 1) He had limited space and had to make decisions about what to include and leave out; 2) These are the people who shaped English history the most—while I understand both points, I don’t know if I agree with every choice. For instance, there is no story about the hero-explorer John Smith. Smith was crucial to the foundation of the Jamestown colony, and his adventures are legendary. Lacey does include the story of Pocahontas (or at least a strong mention of her in a story), even though she was native to the New World. To put her story in the book but to leave Smith’s out sounds, to me, a bit like the class-bias that Smith himself faced in his lifetime. Likewise, when discussing the Crystal Palace Lacey concentrates upon the queen and her husband rather than Paxton, the architect (who receives a passing comment), and his extraordinary ascension to the position. I will concede that I have heard Lacey has other books in this series and that perhaps this book intended to cover just the major authors/works, but this still stood out to me as a glaring, strange choice for the book.
-The book also reads well as informal etymology if you are interested in the subject. Keep in mind that this is not the focus of the book, but there are some nuggets in its pages.
-Finally I want to note what I hope is obvious to any potential reader of this book: The stories are short on detail. While reading a few I felt Lacey had missed too much of the real meat of the story. Again, I acknowledge the space constraints at work, but the feeling still tugged at me throughout the book. For anyone who reads a great deal of historical accounts, expect to find at least one story in Lacey’s book that will have you saying, “Yeaaahhhhh…but there’s more to it than that.”
On the whole, I have to heartily recommend Lacey’s work. If you enjoy reading about history, or if you want to just read about English history in short bursts that are easy to digest, this book is for you.