Jump to ratings and reviews

Contemporary Art: 1989 to the Present

An engaging account of today’s contemporary art world that features original articles by leading international art historians, critics, curators, and artists, introducing varied perspectives on the most important debates and discussions happening around the world.

512 pages, Paperback

First published December 4, 2012

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (24%)
4 stars
12 (41%)
3 stars
8 (27%)
2 stars
2 (6%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Alexander Debkaliuk.
85 reviews2 followers
December 21, 2020
I found content of this compilation particularly not engaging for a casual reader of art theory literature. Some essays are good, but overall package is just not for me.
Profile Image for Chris Hall.
607 reviews3 followers
May 3, 2024
A bit of a mixed bag - some contributions I benefitted from, some I didn't. Some were unnecessarily difficult.
Profile Image for Alicia.
102 reviews30 followers
Read
July 15, 2025
a helpful starting place? but i don’t think the contributions to this book will end up in my reading list or research in a more substantial way than other articles or books by its authors
Profile Image for Robert.
9 reviews7 followers
July 26, 2016
Contemporary Art: 1989 to the Present, edited by Alexander Dumbadze and Suzanne Hudson, is another anthology on contemporary art and its issues and ideas. It is a good anthology if one is only interested in biennials, art markets, globalization, and current art movements such as relational aesthetics and art and activism in our current era. But it lacks any in depth discussion of postcolonialism -- with the rare exception if the author of an essay is from, and discussing, a non-Western country -- feminism, queer and critical race studies -- or identity (or identification) politics of any kind -- at most this is only a surface, or passing, discussion (better, to say, a mention).
I will be having an in depth review of this anthology published in CAA Review. So, ...
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews