By 1994 I was startled by the degree to which she had become a kind of culture hero within the poetry world -- one, let it be said, whose seriousness within the scheme of poetry as it makes its cultural way was well-suited to that period's puritanical fixations and its theoretical endgames -- but then a 1997 Stephen Schiff New Yorker profile scuttled many another's good will toward her, as it exposed what might be called the literary game's star making machinery, while the ensuing Foetry scandal seemed to reflect, within the poetry world, the inevitable decline in the hope for that work she had seemed capable of doing. Foetry exposed the degree to which Graham had misconstrued how coterie operated within the publishing world in which she had made her ascent: The daughter of a painter-sculptor and a journalist, Graham's husband (at the time she started publishing) Bill Graham (of the Washington Post family) was brother to Stephen Graham, instrumental in the start [and beginning in 1995, publisher] of the Ecco Press, which was to publish all her work starting with the third book, The End of Beauty (1987), a book that, not coincidentally, was a stylistic breakthrough for her, as well. In her selecting of prize-winners, she essentially adapted the social networking through which her own career had thrived to the incipient poetry-world contest system as it tried to syncopate itself to her career's rising rhythm. That was her own form of endgame, and indeed the contest system bolted from her absurd use of it, and partially reformed itself. When I heard her read in April 2003, I was struck that she was reading to her St. Louis audience not poems from her most recent 2002 volume, Never, nor the new poems she was then trying to finish from what would become 2005's Overlord, but rather from Swarm (2000) -- as if trying to recover from a kind of hiatus in her relationship with an ongoing, and formerly relied-upon, readership. Frankly I'm not entirely certain I understand the degree to which that readership has moved on.
That said: Place: New Poems. On first reading, I responded most to the themes of displacement and the ambiguity in power, especially in the simultaneous condition of mother-/daughter-hood, e.g., in "Mother and Child," the title a throwback to the generic panels in the Western Art tradition, a frequent titling practice in Graham's first three books. Here the speaker locates herself within sight of "(The Road at the Edge of the Field)" [the poem's subtitle - parenthesis Graham's), acknowledging the scales of attention that draw one's attention away from an immediate task. The speaker is trimming hedges, and the biotic scales are not crashing, exactly, but seem to be in a moment of "inholding of breath by the whole | world as it is seen to be here, horizon to horizon stilling" into an invisibility like that "stasis" that is a "status": of being a mother, of being a daughter. Thought "kens" the image of those roles "into view . . . or not," and the poem's speaker imagines these skeins of thought as "large spidery webtrails" like Whitman's spider as a thought to "outlive . . . for sure the me in me": the poem can be read, I think, as a poem against Whitman's shoreline crisis ode ("Elementary Drifts," it's sometimes called, or "As I Ebb'd With the Ocean of Life" with its "real Me, who stands untouch'd altogether unreached"), for here is the opposite of that change Graham was keen to warn us of in "Never" and other crisis odes in her work, here -- invoking a "letters home" in which the speaker admits to having been identificatorily immersed -- "you would | tell this whole story but | nothing happened" -- and one achieves a biotic naturalism at extenuating odds with the "immobilism" of earlier Graham work. Is the speaker recipient of the letter? Author of it? Mother? Daughter? The stasis here is "kenned into view" as a status.
Readers familiar with the poems of mother-and-daughter-hood from Sharon Olds, or from Louise Gluck, may well share my fascination with Graham's tarrying in the negative here -- which is no doubt the more humanistic approach.
In "Cagnes Sur Mer" and "Untitled" and "Torn Score" and "The Sure Place," as well as "Lapse," there is an interesting dialogue about motherhood, Darwinian force, and psychic longing emerging in the book's best poems, and it is not a book -- as was, say, The Errancy (1997) -- that demands you read it as a sequence, or essentially a long poem. There was an ambition in the sequence that was The Errancy or Swarm, that has been chastened by the restlessness in her readers' response to her work. "Inner Experience," the poem written with eyes closed, before one takes in perception's long route, is insisted on here, and with all the formal techniques that have been at her disposal since the early Eighties.