why are so many literary writers like you know what this novel's missing? a little bit of incest, for flair.
eva luna suffers the unfortunate fate of starting stronger than it ends. by the 60% mark, its magical momentum has petered out and the narrative begins to drag. like a self-fulfilling prophecy, its romance falls into the conventional, easy to anticipate formulas eva becomes used to reading in books, hearing on the radio, and watching on telenovelas. eva, a main character who was once so rebellious, wide-eyed, and full of wonder becomes a dull damsel whose life revolves around the many men who throw themselves at her feet. the progression of a plot filled with revolution, magic, and found family is hard to reconcile with the hurried romantic ending of the novel, or the way this romantic ending seemingly suspends eva's character development for the latter half of eva luna, so that she exists in a kind of permanent stasis.
i will say, this is magical realism through and through. its narrative landscape is bursting with detail, at times nonlinear, not relegated to one single geographic location or character's head. the style, as with many magical realist texts, is expository for much of the novel, something many reviewers appear to take issue with. this critique—that allende tends to tell more often than she shows—fails to acknowledge that magical realism was a literary movement in many ways born out of a tradition of oral storytelling and of observations of cultures caught in the throes of colonial rule.
the "show, don't tell" rule of thumb is to many a western invention that punishes nonwhite modes of storytelling for their ability to ground a story not in images, but in ideas. a number of these writing rules (long-held beliefs about telling a story "the right way") were popularized through the creation of the master of fine arts (MFA) + writing workshops in twentieth century america, which sought to stamp out leftist creative inclinations, effectively replacing manifestos, for example, with literary fiction. the CIA (yes, the CIA) peddled workshops like these to begin to build a western canon that would kill what they called "communist propaganda." this is something to keep in mind when you read a work, especially one from a culturally specific literary movement, and find yourself battling an urge to cry, "show, don't tell!"
eva luna's expository style is actually its strong suit. it's a dense read, yes, but its power lies in its ability to mimic oral storytelling traditions, to move through time and space at eva's whim, to span an entire lifetime and in so doing, trace a lineage of lives and deaths through the pangs of colonialism, magic, and desire. every time i pick up a magical realist text, i'm left reeling, delighted by density and detail, and this was no exception, in spite of the major issues i took with the plot mechanics. and, i should mention, the very dated writing, in terms of transmisogyny, orientalism, and questionable treatment of black characters.