As a person who has gone through all the headache of obtaining a legal working visa in the US, I picked this book with a big smile on my face. It was an interesting reading and I felt related reading the 1st three or four chapters. Sadly, the writer managed well to make some serious mistakes and repeat himself over and over. As the result, the book gets tired and is extremely repetitious despite the review on The Economist that writes: "this book is admirably short"(about 80 pages)
I don’t consider the book as a well-researched and well-argued, it’s rather a disappointment. Sure we all are facing problems and driven crazily through the process of getting such working visas, sure we all know our value and we would love to have as many as possible people who are in decent positions to raise their voice for us , yet when 99 percent of your data and research are about Indian, then Chinese; your research is questionable, and your data is rather misleading.
At the very first pages, the author writes about how he would cry facing discrimination from American kids when he was a kid in the 70s. He writes about the importance of diversity, then how could he name the book “immigrant exodus” yet at the same time completely focus all cases, arguments, examples and data, research on Indian Immigrants, with a slightly bit mentioned about Chinese then lobbying for them? What about the rest of the world? Is this book another kind of discrimination? How could an immigrant, a professor who teaches, a researcher, a member of many boards, make this kind of mistake?
Also, when it comes to high-skilled and educated workers, start-ups and technology are not everything and not the only thing.
The writer could have done a much better job.