3/5
I first heard of the Jerilderie Letter whilst doing some research on Peter Carey's "True History of the Kelly Gang" and I was intrigued. Peter Carey's book is a fictional one based on this letter, written in his style as a fictional biography to an unborn daughter that never existed. Then, deciding that I was going to do my history project on Ned Kelly, I read this to know what his side of the story was.
As someone who is not Australian, someone who hadn't learned anything about Ned Kelly beforehand and with the only access to his history having been the fictional biography by Peter Carey and the 2019 film that was based off of that fictional story (and twisted the history even more), you're given a better painted version of Ned Kelly. Though the book in itself is a great book in my opinion and so is the movie, they're both excellent, Ned Kelly is romanticized to no end and I felt that I fell into the trap of it as well. Reading the Jerilderie Letter, in Ned Kelly's own words (though Joe Byrne wrote it down) was a real eye-opener for me.
I don't believe the writing of it should be rated. Though very grammatically incorrect to the point where it's almost unreadable, you need to take in the context. Joe Byrne had a 5th grade education in a rural setting, of course his literacy wasn't going to be good. So, I find it unfair to rate the writing. You just need some time to unwrap the writing (try reading it aloud if you're having trouble. It helped me understand better).
Whilst reading this, I found myself siding with him but also in parts, I sat there thinking, "Wow, he was full of himself, wasn't he?" In this version, you can read the anger and passion from him dripping off the page but he also boasts about some of the crimes he's committed like his stealing horses. Unlike in Peter Carey's novel, you can pin his flaws better here - Ned was fairly full of himself and his abilities in my opinion and very obviously believed he was right and everyone else that didn't agree was very, very wrong. A very black and white mindset. He was also a very unreliable narrator what with the contradictions of what happened and what didn't and even contradictions in his own tale. Reading his own words was better in that regard than reading the romanticized version because I can see that now.
The other side is that the police had many more advantages than an uneducated bush-ranger ever would. The police had (most likely) much better education and had the advantage of being on the law's side. Many of their actions against Kelly's family and his affiliates could also be considered as unjustified but I do also agree that Kelly could have handled the situation much better. For one, he may have had a bigger chance of staying alive for longer if he hadn't killed the policemen and robbed the banks. Seeing the photos of the Kelly gangs' bodies after they were hanged was upsetting because of how young they were.
I enjoyed reading it and I think that Ned Kelly, if he had had the chance to become more educated and live longer than he did, could have put some writers to shame. He had a very colourful and original voice and that's something I wish I could have seen more of.