I really had a hard time rating this book. Why? Because on one hand, Bart Yates did a really great job concerning characters and narrative tone (see below), but on the other, the plot has what I perceived here as a major flaw: too much drama.
Okay, so first to the things I really liked about the book:
1. The protagonist, Noah. Noah can be a real asshole, but, (and that's what makes him so likeable), he not only knows he's a pain in the ass at times, he resents it on various occasions: he has a loose tongue, an inclination to cynism, and there are situations he feels bad about both. It’s like his mouth runs ahead of his brain about half the time, and he just can’t help it.
I like Noah so much because he feels like a full-fledged, believable, three dimensional teenage boy instead of some cliché. He's not just snippy and rude. He's also very insightful and reflective (e.g. when it comes to his extraordinary mom who writes snobby poetry or his recently deceased dad whom he misses a great deal, or the relationship his parents had). He has a good understanding of love, wants to be loved, and loves back deeply. Apart from that, his narrating is hilarious. Refreshing. He tells this story--using lots of swearing--and his words don't get boring for a second.
2. Noah's mom. Right on the first page, Noah tells us: "Living with Virginia is like living with a myth. She's only half-human; the rest is equal parts wolverine, hyena, goddess and rutting goat. In other words: she's a poet."
Virginia is a great, powerful female character, in my opinion. She's successful, she knows what she wants, she gets shit done. She has a ton of admirable character traits, but she has as many flaws. As the story unfolds, we see her at her most vulnerable: after her husband died, she and Noah moved from Chicago to a rural town in New England where she got a job at the local college and also a Victorian house both are busy to renovate. Behind wood paneling, hidden in the walls, the floors, they find jars the previous (now dead) inhabitants hid there: a mysterious woman--a poet like Virginia--and her insufferable husband. It soon becomes clear something awful must have happened in the old house, and the more messages they find, the more Virgina gets frantic, haunted, tears whole walls down in search for some meaning Noah can't begin to understand. His mother comes apart at the seams for (to him) unknown reasons, and her transformation from a well-organized, headstrong individual to a broken down (still headstrong) mess is unsettling. Her dynamic with Noah is great.
3. Noah's budding romantic relationship with J.D., a neighbor boy who tries very hard not to be gay and is burdened with a mother who seems to hate him.
J.D.'s a nice contrast to Noah's foul mouth, and their story as well as Noah's reflections about it is believable and well told. There are several at times mildly explicit sex scenes, delivered by Noah's narration in an offhand manner. I liked those especially. Basically, I liked Noah's comfortableness with his sexuality. Well done.
So, what's not to like?
There is too much going on in this book.
There is a reason Virgina reacts the way she does. There is a reason J.D.'s mom treats him as bad as she does. It isn't hard to guess both have in common something bad that happened in their past. Of course, Noah and J.D. have to suffer for it in the present. So. This alone would have been enough source for drama (for 244 pages, that is), but then there is also the drama unfolding when Noah's and J.D.'s relationship becomes known (rural town, remember).
While Virginia's problems feel well enough treated by showing the after-effects, the queer shaming (and worse) feels like something the author deemed necessary. As in: this problem isn't carried out with the depth I wished for. It feels half-baked because there isn't enough time in the narration for it to develop, so that subplot seems a bit loose (e.g., the boys are absent from school for a long time—which has the effect they can deal with their family issues, like, the first-order-problems. So, why bother with the school-subplot at all? Why not just make J.D.’s homosexuality known to his family alone and concentrate on the fallout there?)
Now to J.D.'s mom: well, I'd say Virginia'y problem would have been enough. It's too much of the same (story-wise!!! It's awful what happened to J.D.'s mom, and I'm the last person to talk sth. like that down!). It doesn't serve the story, really. Also, there is this thing the author made that feels to me like a big, big mistake: towards the end, J.D.'s dad comes to talk to Noah about something he hasn't told J.D. when he informed him about the reason his mother treats him as she does: he tells Noah a way more detailed (even more awful) version of what happened to J.D.'s mom, and the whole purpose I can see the author did this for is to make me, the reader, even more sympathetic for a mom who beats her son. Thing is: I already felt sorry for her; I'm actually capable of doing both: resenting her beating her innocent son and feeling sorry for her, astonishing, isn't it; so the gory detail felt not only unnecessary but unbelievable: what was J.D.'s dad's motivation to tell this to a stranger (Noah) and take the risk of Noah telling J.D. about it (a thing J.D.’s father says he doesn’t want)? From his words, it's so Noah doesn't think so bad of him and his wife, but really, that seems a bit far-stretched...
So, as a conclusion, this book has great potential (characters, Noah’s reflections, his narrating), but Bart Yates tried to deal with too many irons in the fire and overdid things in the process, thus ruined it a bit for me. And, since this is a major story telling issue, I can’t—sadly—bring myself to give this book 4 stars, although I’d really want to. Argh! So conflicting.